Smart guy to leave - 2A nutters were probably armed. Definitely crazy. |
Try harder, troll |
No, you didn’t. |
Yep, I really did. Well, last week I did. Today I printed a TEC-9. Not a functional print, just a prototype for machine set up for when I print the real ones. Gotta dig up some TEC 9 parts now! Check out "CTRL+pew dot com". All sorts of files for printing all sorts of guns. And the code is embedded in JPG files, so good luck filtering that out, lolz!!! |
You don't support civil rights? As Ida B. Wells, one of the founders of the NAACP and an early civil rights leader, wrote in 1892, “The lesson this teaches and which every Afro-American should ponder well, is that a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give.” |
I'm sure dozens of people, if not more, were discretely armed. But not a single gun was visible. And yet despite at least dozens of guns in the crowd, no one got shot. Contrast that to DC, just across the river, where no one has a gun, yet people are getting shot all the time. And you wanna make VA like DC. Idiot. |
Hey moron, those are not “civil rights”. Perhaps you mean “civil liberties” or “paranoid nut job”? |
Hey brainiac, WHERE the F do you think people in DC get their guns? Hint: they aren’t making them in their basement like nutjob PP. |
Hey you old decrepit privileged white spinster, they absolutely are civil rights. The police do not protect POC to the degree that they protect wealthy white people. That inequity is a civil rights issue and the point of that quote. Heck, if you are familiar with the civil rights era, you well know the role that firearms played in keeping people safe under the threat that white supremacists posed. https://www.npr.org/2014/06/05/319072156/guns-kept-people-alive-during-the-civil-rights-movement Reading the opinions in McDonald v. Chicago10 years ago, you might think it was as much a civil-rights case as a gun case... |
Weak sauce argument. Arming oneself in no way promotes "civil rights". You can use your "civil liberties" to defend yourself from the white supremacists (GOP's "very fine people"), but it does not actually advance the cause of "civil rights". Sorry, don't believe all of the crap you read on your 2A nutter newsletters.
|
Then by your moronic logic, where access to and availability of guns = gun crime, then VA should have MUCH more gun crime than DC, where guns are very hard to obtain. If guns caused gun crime, then places which you claim are the SOURCE of those guns - Virginia - should have much higher rates of gun crime than the places those guns are illegally transferred to after purchase. But Virginia DOESN'T have higher rates of violent crimes than DC. It has a FRACTION of it. Fairfax county, to use as an example, has a violent crime rate of 81 per 100K residents. DC has a violent crime rate of 996 per 100K residents. More than 1,100 PERCENT HIGHER. If guns caused crime, as you say, then it should be the exact opposite from what we see in the numbers. Therefore, it MUST be some *other* factor, besides guns. Gee, I wonder what that other factor is?...... Now, call me a racist, then disappear. |
The vast majority of gun violence in DC can be traced back to VA. It’s our problem. We are killing people. YOU are killing people because you love your guns. YOU HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS. |
Oh shut up with your histrionic nonsense. Answer the damn question that was put to you! Stop deflecting with your bullsh!t! If guns cause crime, why doesn't Virginia, which is awash in guns, have a higher gun crime rate than DC? |
Who is this "we" you refer to? You personally? Some group you belong to? The people doing the killing are, for the most part, hardened criminal sociopaths and psychopaths who are already prohibited from possessing or using firearms, and certainly killing anyone. To suggest that responsible gun owners, society in general or anyone else is legally or morally responsible for the crimes of such persons is preposterous. |
|