Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are republicans refusing to call Mike Judge at the hearing if they believe Kavanaugh’s story?

They fear that Judge might change his statements under oath...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are republicans refusing to call Mike Judge at the hearing if they believe Kavanaugh’s story?

They fear that Judge might change his statements under oath...

So what. Tell the truth and get a good nominee on the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are republicans refusing to call Mike Judge at the hearing if they believe Kavanaugh’s story?

Because he’s a terrible witness who will make them look bad. Her story alleges that he was watching BK and CBF and then jumped on them - unclear why, but sounds like as a participant. He has a history of alcoholism and wrote a book which mentions a character that seems like BKand Judge has a history, in writing, of a lot of terrible comments about women.

Of I were BK, I wouldn’t want this guy to testify either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Great, have the White House ask the FBI for investiage everyone involved and the actual incident. You won’t find a single democrat opposed to that.

Okay. Do a background check on her and interview Kavanaugh and Ford. Also, interview Judge.

She doesn't know who else was there--according to reports. She doesn't know where it was. She doesn't even know what year it was--whether she was a sophomore, or whatever.

She said she told no one.

Good luck with your investigation.

She sure did smear the guy with all of her confusion. I think she had a bad therapist.

She know the general area it was, she knows the time of year, she has identified others there. Her story has been consistent for more than a decade.

He has changed his story entirely today from yesterday. There’s your liar.

Who were her girlfriends there?

Therapist notes said four boys attacked her. Ford says mistake in therapist notes--it was two boys and four was the number of people at the party. So a possible explanation is that the party was four boys and her with no other girls.

OMG. She clearly confused. I feel badly for her. Does she have children?

She said there were four boys were at the party, two in the room. She believes her therapist transcribed wrong. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html

So her therapist is also confused. Lovely.

Democrats want to call all confirmatory witnesses at the hearings so they don’t seem too worried. For some reason, republicans are refusing to cross examine these witnesses. Wonder why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are republicans refusing to call Mike Judge at the hearing if they believe Kavanaugh’s story?

Because he’s a terrible witness who will make them look bad. Her story alleges that he was watching BK and CBF and then jumped on them - unclear why, but sounds like as a participant. He has a history of alcoholism and wrote a book which mentions a character that seems like BKand Judge has a history, in writing, of a lot of terrible comments about women.

Of I were BK, I wouldn’t want this guy to testify either.

He doesn’t want the one person who could give him an alibi to do so. Nothing suspicious here.

[Anonymous]

Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are republicans refusing to call Mike Judge at the hearing if they believe Kavanaugh’s story?

Because he’s a terrible witness who will make them look bad. Her story alleges that he was watching BK and CBF and then jumped on them - unclear why, but sounds like as a participant. He has a history of alcoholism and wrote a book which mentions a character that seems like BKand Judge has a history, in writing, of a lot of terrible comments about women.

Of I were BK, I wouldn’t want this guy to testify either.

Too bad. What was the company this guy kept?

[Anonymous]

google Bart O'Kavanaugh an d understand why Judge would be a terrible witness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Great, have the White House ask the FBI for investiage everyone involved and the actual incident. You won’t find a single democrat opposed to that.

Okay. Do a background check on her and interview Kavanaugh and Ford. Also, interview Judge.

She doesn't know who else was there--according to reports. She doesn't know where it was. She doesn't even know what year it was--whether she was a sophomore, or whatever.

She said she told no one.

Good luck with your investigation.

She sure did smear the guy with all of her confusion. I think she had a bad therapist.

She know the general area it was, she knows the time of year, she has identified others there. Her story has been consistent for more than a decade.

He has changed his story entirely today from yesterday. There’s your liar.

Who were her girlfriends there?

Therapist notes said four boys attacked her. Ford says mistake in therapist notes--it was two boys and four was the number of people at the party. So a possible explanation is that the party was four boys and her with no other girls.

OMG. She clearly confused. I feel badly for her. Does she have children?

She said there were four boys were at the party, two in the room. She believes her therapist transcribed wrong. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html

So her therapist is also confused. Lovely.

Therapist here. It’s vastly more plausible that the therapist wrote 4 instead of 2 or was condensing the story and got that wrong than that Christine Ford has been telling people a lie for years about being assaulted by a man who went on to become a federal judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

The terms of the hearing are still being negotiated. Ford wants to bring all corroborating witnesses. Republicans are refusing, afraid of the truth apparently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

Give it a rest. Just because an 85 year old Senator thinks that her attorney hasn't responded to a couple recent phone calls made hours earlier doesn't mean she isn't responding.

In the meantime, Susan Collins has already proposed a format that's completely different than what Grassley outlined, so it's not surprising that her attorney is being deliberate. Note that she's a private citizen on a different coast who's being asked to provide a public victims account on national TV... I don't think it's unusual to take some before agreeing to logistical details. Most depositions I'm involved with take months to schedule, and her appearance is requested in 5 business days.

You obviously have an agenda. Drop it and let the process work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

Give it a rest. Just because an 85 year old Senator thinks that her attorney hasn't responded to a couple recent phone calls made hours earlier doesn't mean she isn't responding.

In the meantime, Susan Collins has already proposed a format that's completely different than what Grassley outlined, so it's not surprising that her attorney is being deliberate. Note that she's a private citizen on a different coast who's being asked to provide a public victims account on national TV... I don't think it's unusual to take some before agreeing to logistical details. Most depositions I'm involved with take months to schedule, and her appearance is requested in 5 business days.

You obviously have an agenda. Drop it and let the process work.

Unlike the other 85 year old Senator who knew these allegations for around six weeks and interviewed the "assailant" and never even asked him about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Great, have the White House ask the FBI for investiage everyone involved and the actual incident. You won’t find a single democrat opposed to that.

Okay. Do a background check on her and interview Kavanaugh and Ford. Also, interview Judge.

She doesn't know who else was there--according to reports. She doesn't know where it was. She doesn't even know what year it was--whether she was a sophomore, or whatever.

She said she told no one.

Good luck with your investigation.

She sure did smear the guy with all of her confusion. I think she had a bad therapist.

She know the general area it was, she knows the time of year, she has identified others there. Her story has been consistent for more than a decade.

He has changed his story entirely today from yesterday. There’s your liar.

Who were her girlfriends there?

Therapist notes said four boys attacked her. Ford says mistake in therapist notes--it was two boys and four was the number of people at the party. So a possible explanation is that the party was four boys and her with no other girls.

OMG. She clearly confused. I feel badly for her. Does she have children?

She said there were four boys were at the party, two in the room. She believes her therapist transcribed wrong. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html

So her therapist is also confused. Lovely.

Therapist here. It’s vastly more plausible that the therapist wrote 4 instead of 2 or was condensing the story and got that wrong than that Christine Ford has been telling people a lie for years about being assaulted by a man who went on to become a federal judge.

+1. As a therapist, you do your notes between sessions or at the end of the day--it's possible Dr. Blasey's therapist may have inadvertently got a detail wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

The terms of the hearing are still being negotiated. Ford wants to bring all corroborating witnesses. Republicans are refusing, afraid of the truth apparently.

What corroborating witnesses? There was nobody present at the time this “assault” presumably occurred that she could call, other than the other person she said was in the room. Anything others would be saying is hearsay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why has Ford not responded if she plans to attend? Doesn’t she want to be heard?

Give it a rest. Just because an 85 year old Senator thinks that her attorney hasn't responded to a couple recent phone calls made hours earlier doesn't mean she isn't responding.

In the meantime, Susan Collins has already proposed a format that's completely different than what Grassley outlined, so it's not surprising that her attorney is being deliberate. Note that she's a private citizen on a different coast who's being asked to provide a public victims account on national TV... I don't think it's unusual to take some before agreeing to logistical details. Most depositions I'm involved with take months to schedule, and her appearance is requested in 5 business days.

You obviously have an agenda. Drop it and let the process work.

Unlike the other 85 year old Senator who knew these allegations for around six weeks and interviewed the "assailant" and never even asked him about it.

Who cares whether Feinstein asked him it. Irrelevant. Go back to your yardwork and let the real lawyers weigh in.