Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

[Anonymous]

I was not a fan and now will not watch anything she is in.

[Anonymous]

Her and her husband are sooooooo annoying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

OK. I still didn't get the outrage this summer and I thought that video outrage was stupid and an obvious smear tactic since it was previously unreleased. It wasn't nice but I also don't think many people in LA are nice. I am neutral on her generally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.deuxmoi.world/latest/publicist-jennifer-abel-allegedly-breaks-silence-on-explosive-text-messages-in-baldoni-lawsuitist

Dummy. She doesn't need to be subpoenaed since these are work communications. They either subpoenaed the previous company or the company agreed to hand them over. Either way her permission is not needed. There is a message of her saying "I am having reckless thoughts about planting pieces over how're awful Blake is this week" so this "i would NEVER" is BS

I’m confused about when they subpoenaed the documents since the complaint was just filed this week?

CA allows discovery.

[Anonymous]

Justin is a disgusting, abusive creep.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, I don’t buy either side. If it was really so bad why didn’t she quit during filming? Why didn’t she call the cops? She’s filthy rich with a powerful husband and was raised by connected parents, this is not some desperate 19 year old from Kansas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Justin is a disgusting, abusive creep.

Fool destroyed his own career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

You're focusing on the least part of what she's alleging. Just skipping all the other stuff. Why is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting how the marketing plan was to focus on the reslience of the character and not on the domestic violence and to have Blake wear a flowered theme to reflect the character's work as a florist and then they used their own marketing plan against her to make her look shallow by not being serious and focused on the domestic violence themes.

This guy and the team he hired seem pretty sociopathic.

I also saw that the women who reposted the baby bump video where Blake made a comment was paid to repost it on a specific date by the crisis team Baldoni hired.

Right except my read on the timeline is that this marketing was failing before Baldoni started his PR campaign.

The marketing campaign was Sony. They directed her to talk about florals, not Justin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

You're focusing on the least part of what she's alleging. Just skipping all the other stuff. Why is that?

1. That’s the part that seems to be in all headlines, the focus on the times article, and the press releases. (And yes I read the complaint).

2. It’s a huge part of damages and without that piece, it’s questionable whether she would have brought her case.

She has like 8 counts. Strange that you don’t focus on the other 7.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting how the marketing plan was to focus on the reslience of the character and not on the domestic violence and to have Blake wear a flowered theme to reflect the character's work as a florist and then they used their own marketing plan against her to make her look shallow by not being serious and focused on the domestic violence themes.

This guy and the team he hired seem pretty sociopathic.

I also saw that the women who reposted the baby bump video where Blake made a comment was paid to repost it on a specific date by the crisis team Baldoni hired.

Right except my read on the timeline is that this marketing was failing before Baldoni started his PR campaign.

The marketing campaign was Sony. They directed her to talk about florals, not Justin.

Whoever did that, was really dumb. Stuff like that helped cause the anti Blake sentiment this summer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

You're focusing on the least part of what she's alleging. Just skipping all the other stuff. Why is that?

1. That’s the part that seems to be in all headlines, the focus on the times article, and the press releases. (And yes I read the complaint).

2. It’s a huge part of damages and without that piece, it’s questionable whether she would have brought her case.

She has like 8 counts. Strange that you don’t focus on the other 7.

Because most people are too stupid to understand what's really going on. Like you.