Trump's Address to Congress - March 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how Trump's ear cartilage grew back.

No mark of any kind. It's like he'd never even been shot. Amaaaazing.

Don't let Trump's win derange you to this degree. Going full truther about a gunshot everyone saw won't help anything.

Can you explain how his cartilage doesn't have a scar or hole or any mark whatsoever? I mean, its a miracle!

Conspiracy theorist in the house ^^
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fbi-confirms-bullet-struck-trumps-ear-assassination-attempt-rcna163896

Gee you MAGAs love spreading false conspiracy theories like "ThE 2020 eLEcTION wAS StoLEn" and "J6 wAs AntIFa aND FeDBoiS" et cetera et cetera et cetera so it makes it ironic and hypocritical that you wouldn't enjoy a good conspiracy theory from the other side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Melania looks like a man in makeup

She’s been looking more and more like him over the years.

You dems are hilarious. I’ve never seen so many digs on people’s appearances.

And they claim to be so accepting. 🙄

OK Hypocrite. How about the fact that Trump insists on calling Michelle Obama "Mike" because he says she looks like a man. How's that for some man child Republican trolling?

When did he do that?

He never did that. The PP is lying, as usual.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/19/viral-image/no-donald-trump-didnt-call-michelle-obama-mike-in/

Who is lying?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/donald-trump-made-comments-former-34749017

OMG. Another deranged Democrat who actually believes the lies that serial liar Michael Wolff has told. And "The Mirror"? Bless your heart. Once again, this was debunked. He never called Michelle Obama "Mike." Keep on lying.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/19/viral-image/no-donald-trump-didnt-call-michelle-obama-mike-in/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is this fake Democrat talking?

I don’t think he is good on immigration, he just sold it well.

He told a lot of lies about immigration, "ThEY aRE EaTinG CaTS aND DOgS" and now he's failing on his promises. He isn't making the border any more secure and deported fewer people last month than Biden did in his last month. He said he would prioritize violent felons but instead is deporting harmless farm workers, maids, kitchen staff, and so on.

Unfortunately, Trump and his made up stories are more attention grabbing and entertaining. I thought the democrat response was good but it felt like an hr training video.

Times are different and being entertaining sells. Take Jasmine Crockett, remove any political thoughts about her and ask yourself why she is so popular. She isn’t boring to listen to and is willing to talk as crazy as they do (bleach blonde, bad built, Butch body)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

We need a REAL Democrat standing up there, not this fake liberal woman spitting Republican /MAGA talking points!

Sorry to burst your bubble but she's very much a real Democrat and that is actually the real Democrat platform and was pretty much also the Democrat platform when Kamala Harris ran.

And IF ONLY THEY WERE Republican/MAGA talking points. We WANT YOU TO STOP GIVING TAX CUTS TO BILLIONAIRES WHO DON'T NEED THEM, especially if you are so concerned about the debt. We WANT you to protect social security, to protect medicare, to keep our defensive alliances, to not have trade wars and tariffs and piss off our closest friends like Canada. How can you say Slotkin's speech was "Republican/MAGA" talking points when Trump and the Republicans are doing the exact opposite of what Slotkin talked about? How can you not understand or see that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All in all I’d say he did pretty well tonight.

It was awful and boring. He looks sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

She was an odd pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All in all I’d say he did pretty well tonight.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Trump actually called out what he was exposing, that Democrats will not celebrate anything good because Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how Trump's ear cartilage grew back.

No mark of any kind. It's like he'd never even been shot. Amaaaazing.

Don't let Trump's win derange you to this degree. Going full truther about a gunshot everyone saw won't help anything.

Can you explain how his cartilage doesn't have a scar or hole or any mark whatsoever? I mean, its a miracle!

Conspiracy theorist in the house ^^
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fbi-confirms-bullet-struck-trumps-ear-assassination-attempt-rcna163896

Gee you MAGAs love spreading false conspiracy theories like "ThE 2020 eLEcTION wAS StoLEn" and "J6 wAs AntIFa aND FeDBoiS" et cetera et cetera et cetera so it makes it ironic and hypocritical that you wouldn't enjoy a good conspiracy theory from the other side.

And we never got any kind of actual medical report about Trump's ear, nor anything else about his health that is believable (yea sure he's 200lbs with those size 50 pants). Why is that? What are they covering up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

Slotkin failed to vigorously stand up for the rights of LGTBQIA++ folks, and especially transgender teen athletes who t-rump unfairly attacked viciously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems dressed in pink to support women yet voted against banning men from women’s sports?

Are you kidding me??? lol

It's weird this bothers you more than the fact we are now governed by a full blown autocrat. It's scary as crap how crazy and incompetent this man is.

He has sense enough to know that biological men should not be playing against girls. If you think that is okay, I prefer Trump's point.

You have seized on this so you don't have to pay attention to any other issues.

It is a perfect example of how stupid and out of touch Democrats are. A vast majority of Americans are opposed to men in women's sports because most people have common sense. Only the woke idiots are in favor of something so ridiculous and harmful to actual women and girls. Democrats clearly haven't learned a thing because they keep doubling down on it.

It's a matter of degree. I don't agree with transwomen in the Olympics but a kid on a rec team who is experiencing gender dysmorphia? Of course they should play. Republicans are extremist on this issue.

Some of the Republicans were actually pushing for having random school personnel conduct genital examinations of girls as young as 5 years old before even allowing them to play with other girls on the playground. I'm not kidding, it's disgusting how extreme many of them are.

What a liar you are.
DP

not a lie
https://ohiohouse.gov/news/democrat/ohio-republicans-want-to-force-children-to-undergo-genital-exams-to-play-high-school-sports-110422

There has been no concrete statement or evidence saying genital exams would be used. This goes for Ohio too.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/04/06/kansas-legislature-sports/

Republicans are pedo perverts.

Genital exams for little girls. Disgusting.
https://www.newsweek.com/kansas-republicans-pass-bill-genital-examinations-schoolchildren-students-transgender-1792954

https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/04/06/kansas-legislature-sports/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing how Trump's ear cartilage grew back.

No mark of any kind. It's like he'd never even been shot. Amaaaazing.

Don't let Trump's win derange you to this degree. Going full truther about a gunshot everyone saw won't help anything.

Can you explain how his cartilage doesn't have a scar or hole or any mark whatsoever? I mean, its a miracle!

Conspiracy theorist in the house ^^
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fbi-confirms-bullet-struck-trumps-ear-assassination-attempt-rcna163896

Gee you MAGAs love spreading false conspiracy theories like "ThE 2020 eLEcTION wAS StoLEn" and "J6 wAs AntIFa aND FeDBoiS" et cetera et cetera et cetera so it makes it ironic and hypocritical that you wouldn't enjoy a good conspiracy theory from the other side.

And we never got any kind of actual medical report about Trump's ear, nor anything else about his health that is believable (yea sure he's 200lbs with those size 50 pants). Why is that? What are they covering up?

Fat people are so disgusting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

She was an odd pick.

She’s a closet Republican who likes to talk about herself and nothing else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slotkin's rebuttal:

The economy: Helping out the middle class, not billionaires. Helping the working class where it comes to groceries and healthcare. Keeping the benefits like social security and medicare that workers worked for their whole lives. Not imposing destructive tariffs and not giving billionaires tax breaks.

National security and public safety: Not firing the people who safeguard our nuclear arsenal, our air traffic controllers, and so on. Securing the border but actually having a plan for immigration. Keeping our defensive alliances intact. True strength meaning using our military and economic might with moral clarity like Reagan - unlike the transactional Trump nonsense. AMERICAN leadership in the world, not Chinese or Russian.

That's what most Democrats actually stand for. But the people living in their MAGA bubbles don't understand that. They are only told "they want to trick your kids into thinking they are they/them" and other nonsense.

She was an odd pick.

Why, because it didn't comport with all of the stuff your MAGA bubble has been brainwashing you into believing about Democrats? That's not a Slotkin problem, that's a right-wing-media problem and a you problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump actually called out what he was exposing, that Democrats will not celebrate anything good because Trump.

What was shocking to me is that it didn’t appear to be any type of group consensus of what to do for this speech. They should have just skipped, it would have been a much stronger message.