GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah, I don’t know what she was thinking. Smith did it the right way and narrowed it to Trump to get the best chance possible for a speedy trial. She guaranteed hers will take years when she indicted so many people and charged RICO. Dumb move.

What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.

Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.

That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.

This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.

Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.

There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.

What makes anyone think Trump would submit to any court if he got power again? He’s going to be a petty dictator if he gets back in office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seth Abramson has taken a crack at the list of unindicted conspirators:

#1: TOM FITTON
#2: GA “elector”
#3: BORIS EPSHTEYN
#4: ROBERT SINNERS
#5: DAN SCAVINO *or* MOLLY MICHAEL
#6: PHIL WALDRON
#7: ?
#8: BURT JONES
#9–19: GA “electors”
#20: MICHAEL FLYNN *or* PATRICK BYRNE
#21/#22: TODD SANDERS
#21/#22: CONAN HAYES
#23: Called by HARRISON FLOYD, 1/3/21
#24–29: Coffee County plotters
#30: Powell-linked lawyer

More on Lt. Gov. Burt Jones

[Anonymous]

More on the unindicted co-conspirators

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah, I don’t know what she was thinking. Smith did it the right way and narrowed it to Trump to get the best chance possible for a speedy trial. She guaranteed hers will take years when she indicted so many people and charged RICO. Dumb move.

What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.

Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.

That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.

This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.

Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.

There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.

What makes anyone think Trump would submit to any court if he got power again? He’s going to be a petty dictator if he gets back in office.

Exactly. If he wins it's game over for democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah, I don’t know what she was thinking. Smith did it the right way and narrowed it to Trump to get the best chance possible for a speedy trial. She guaranteed hers will take years when she indicted so many people and charged RICO. Dumb move.

What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.

Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.

That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.

This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.

Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.

There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.

NOt same standing. VP isn't even in the same branch of government.

[Anonymous]

Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

What is the enterprise?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

What is the enterprise?

It is a criminal conspiracy to commit numerous coordinated fraudulent acts for the purpose of illegally overturning the election of the presidential electors in Georgia and pressuring state officials to appoint their unelected fraudulent electors in place of the elected electors. That’s a criminal enterprise. Do you think they have to incorporate as an LLC to qualify as an enterprise?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

What is the enterprise?

It is a criminal conspiracy to commit numerous coordinated fraudulent acts for the purpose of illegally overturning the election of the presidential electors in Georgia and pressuring state officials to appoint their unelected fraudulent electors in place of the elected electors. That’s a criminal enterprise. Do you think they have to incorporate as an LLC to qualify as an enterprise?

Fraudulent electors are alternate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

+1

Oh wow a Republican thinks we shouldn’t punish Republicans for felonies they commit? Gee, he sounds like an honorable upstanding piece of trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.

That’s stupid.

What is the enterprise?

It is a criminal conspiracy to commit numerous coordinated fraudulent acts for the purpose of illegally overturning the election of the presidential electors in Georgia and pressuring state officials to appoint their unelected fraudulent electors in place of the elected electors. That’s a criminal enterprise. Do you think they have to incorporate as an LLC to qualify as an enterprise?

[Anonymous]

Aren’t alternate electors legal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t alternate electors legal?

Fake ones aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t alternate electors legal?

Fake ones aren't.

I don’t’ understand. Please show me that the electors were not alternate and instead, were created after the fact as fakes.