Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

Meghan did not percieve it that way and she's clearly put out.

No, according to the letters patent, the great grandchildren of the monarch are not princes. Once Charles becomes King, Archie will be a Prince.

Archie would have had a title (Earl of Dumbarton), but not Prince until Charles ascended the throne. Then, like Eugenie and Beatice, he could be prince. Meghan is full of shit.

Doesn’t this mean Charlotte and Lois should not be prince/princess?

No, they are children of a future monarch (William); Archie is not unless William dies before Charles ascends the throne.

[Anonymous]

Congrats to the British taxpayers who paid millions of pounds for a fake wedding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My read:

The racist comment about Archie's complexion came from Charles.

The decision to put out a new letter of patent specifically to prevent Archie (and any subsequent H&M children) from becoming Princes and Princesses came from Charles.

The decision to deny Megan the mental health support she requested came from Charles.

The decision to not provide security to Archie came from Charles.

William and Kate aren't saints here either, but make no mistake, Harry walked away because of the decisions made by his father. The "lack of support" refers to Charles.

Harry walked away because he's a man who did what he had to do to protect his wife and child. He faced this uphill battle because his own father refused to help.

And despite all that, Harry still desperately wants his father's love and approval.

+1

I doubt this is all Charles. But I suspect that Harry is ultimately treated poorly because of questions surrounding his parentage (he looks like Diana's lover) and that is why Charles treats him like an outsider.

No, he looks exactly like Diana's red-headed-when-young brother, Earl Spencer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe the crown would not allow Archie to be a Prince. If third is true-this is unforgivable.

You need to learn more about how this works. It’s fully within protocol for him to not be a prince upon birth.

It was fully within protocol not to do that with Charlotte and Louis.

Because they are in the direct line of succession.

They’re the spares — just like Harry.

No. Harry is not in the direct line because he’s not the first born, nor is he a child of the first born.

Being the second born is VERY different. Ask Margaret (or well, read about her, as she’s dead).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My read:

The racist comment about Archie's complexion came from Charles.

The decision to put out a new letter of patent specifically to prevent Archie (and any subsequent H&M children) from becoming Princes and Princesses came from Charles.

The decision to deny Megan the mental health support she requested came from Charles.

The decision to not provide security to Archie came from Charles.

William and Kate aren't saints here either, but make no mistake, Harry walked away because of the decisions made by his father. The "lack of support" refers to Charles.

Harry walked away because he's a man who did what he had to do to protect his wife and child. He faced this uphill battle because his own father refused to help.

And despite all that, Harry still desperately wants his father's love and approval.

+1

I doubt this is all Charles. But I suspect that Harry is ultimately treated poorly because of questions surrounding his parentage (he looks like Diana's lover) and that is why Charles treats him like an outsider.

No, he looks exactly like Diana's red-headed-when-young brother, Earl Spencer.

Harry is the spitting image of Earl Spencer with the red hair, and a strong hint of Charles in the close-set eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I don’t know if I’m allowed to ask this here but do you all think Diana’s death was an accident

Yes. A tragic accident that was a culmination of a series of bad choices.

+1 If she had word her seatbelt, she'd be alive.

And if her security hadn’t been stripped she’d still be alive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No security and no princely title for the black baby.

Meghan and Harry made the no title decision. He would have been granted one by the Queen.

Meghan did not percieve it that way and she's clearly put out.

No, according to the letters patent, the great grandchildren of the monarch are not princes. Once Charles becomes King, Archie will be a Prince.

Archie would have had a title (Earl of Dumbarton), but not Prince until Charles ascended the throne. Then, like Eugenie and Beatice, he could be prince. Meghan is full of shit.

Doesn’t this mean Charlotte and Lois should not be prince/princess?

No, they are children of a future monarch (William); Archie is not unless William dies before Charles ascends the throne.

Archie does not become king unless Charles, William, all his children, and Harry die.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I don’t know if I’m allowed to ask this here but do you all think Diana’s death was an accident

Yes. A tragic accident that was a culmination of a series of bad choices.

+1 If she had word her seatbelt, she'd be alive.

And if her security hadn’t been stripped she’d still be alive

Her choice was the critical one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, did they take her passport before or after she flew to NY for the bridal shower?

Or when she flew to NY just to watch a tennis game? Girl can’t even keep her lies straight.

Her story seems consistent. She said she had to be approved for outings and at some point the aides decided she was "over saturated" and stopped approving even lunch dates.

She never alleged she was held hostage. Just that the mechanics of leaving the grounds were difficult to navigate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I don’t know if I’m allowed to ask this here but do you all think Diana’s death was an accident

Yes. A tragic accident that was a culmination of a series of bad choices.

+1 If she had word her seatbelt, she'd be alive.

And if her security hadn’t been stripped she’d still be alive

They were divorced and she was no longer officially royal. If her brother had let her hide out at the family home that summer, she'd be alive. If she and Dodi had stayed at the hotel that night, they'd be alive. If his driver wasn'r blind drunk, she'd be alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that there is this much conversation on this at midnight on a Sunday does not bode well for the royal family come dawn.

Fact. But half of it here appears to be Megan McCain/Megyn Kelly/Kayleigh McEnany clones saying “racism is ok and listen to this story about a comment on my hair” posters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, did they take her passport before or after she flew to NY for the bridal shower?

Little in her story holds up. She lies easily but isn't particularly good at it.

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wondering how dark the baby will be is an innocuous comment during casual conversation from a curious white person. Black people also speak like this and wonder or theorize on the shade or complexion of a baby. It's just not a big deal at all.

It's akin to labeling an innocent white girl who wants to touch your black hair because it's fascinating some sort of demonic racist. Fake race hustling and/or you're mentally ill.

And of course, that's assuming the comment even happened or happened precisely as s/he described, which it most certainly didn't.

Are you joking? That’s incredibly offensive.

Like really! WTF is wrong with PP!

A black gal on my floor at college thought my "good white hair" was pretty and wanted to touch it. I guess I should have called her a racist offensive wacko.

No F’ing way. We are not doing this. We will not bothsides this issue.
What happened to Meghan was wrong and telling a single college story (which is likely made up anyway) about your hair doesn’t excuse some royal worrying about the skin color of Meghan’s baby.

Take this bothsides crap elsewhere.

Worrying? You're gaslighting. WONDERING natural curiosity is 100% NORMAL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Congrats to the British taxpayers who paid millions of pounds for a fake wedding

That's not all they are paying for. They have a mob family extorting them and for some reason think it's fantastic.

[Anonymous]

Hateful spiteful women up late tonight.

Go to bed, you need every second of a beauty sleep for your catty souls.