
I am confused by why someone who is objecting to a potential Waples Mill ES and Greenbriar East ES boundary change to move kids out of Fairfax into Oakton and vice versa is pointing to a development in an area that is zoned to Oakton ES/Thoreau MS/Oakton HS. Perhaps you could try harder to explain the relevance and your thought process. I thought you were suggesting this area is currently zoned to Fairfax but somehow was going to be reassigned to Oakton via boundary changes. |
Yes - it was 3 (Bren Mar Park, Weyanoke, and Hunt Valley). It made no sense. |
I am confused why someone would prioritize maintaining the boundary on a lot with a vacant commercial building over students who live in Oakton in neighborhoods that have attended Oakton high for decades. Maybe change the boundary on the lot where no residential structures currently exist instead? Especially when that lot is conveniently located at the intersection of 66 and 123 and would be more efficient to bus kids to Fairfax high than Waples kids? |
If they try to move Waples to Fairfax, I hope Fairfax is ready for a barrage of lawsuits. |
You are prioritizing “a development in an area that is zoned to Oakton ES/Thoreau MS/Oakton HS” over students in established neighborhoods. What promises did FCPS make to the developers about boundaries? Why do established neighborhoods and residents not get the same level of priority? Redrawing the boundary on a lot for a vacant commercial building is ALWAYS less impactful than dividing established communities. Again, why is the boundary for the empty commercial building a done deal? Why is the speculative capacity increase for this not-yet approved development given priority over existing communities? |
What would they sue over? |
Do you get it now? Do you see my thought process?
The basis for sending Waples students to Fairfax high should NOT be the current boundary line for an as-yet unapproved development that currently houses a vacant commercial building. Redraw that boundary. |
I did not post this lawsuit threat. I think lawsuits are costly and unpredictable. There is no reason for lawsuits if FCPS provides communities with an opportunity for meaningful comments in response to draft proposals. However, a lack of transparency that invites lawsuits. When citizens are left without meaningful opportunities to participate in the processes that have an immense impact on their families, sometimes they must seek redress and transparency through the courts. I am hopeful that will be entirely unnecessary. This does not need to be an adversarial process. We all want balance and access to resources for all students in FCPS. But these boundary changes need more meaningful opportunities for community feedback and participation. |
OK, got it. You're objecting to new development in the Oakton district, insofar as it could be viewed as contributing in some way to a potential decision to move other areas between Oakton and Fairfax. The area in question is already zoned to Oakton, and it looks like it would be easier to get to Oakton from that site than to Fairfax. I understand the frustration over the possibility that Waples Mill could be reassigned, which seems like messing with something that didn't need to be fixed. |
If the site was approved this month, it would still be years away. Surveys, permits, etc. Then, building and sales. It will be years and the population of both Oakton and Madison could shift downward--or upward. But, you cannot take a site that is so close and send it somewhere else at this time. Way too many variables. Waples Mill and Navy kids drive by that site on the way to Oakton, I think? |
She’s awful |
On what grounds? Look, many families across the county are going to get moved. Most people won't like it, especially the ones that are moving from a school that ranks higher to a school that ranks lower. There's overcapacity and undercapacity that needs to be fixed. This is from someone who will likely have her child shifted at his junior year in high school from one of the best schools in the county to one of the (if not the) worst in the county. I've been involved with my citizens association, written to the school board, written to the school administration trying to make my plea. But my house is equidistant to a number of high schools. Maybe my child will have to move. Maybe he won't. There isn't much more I can do. Who exactly are you suing? We were never guaranteed a specific high school when we bought our house. |
If the site is years away, why make it basis for boundary changes now? It is a vacant commercial building. Yes, you are correct, “Waples Mill and Navy kids drive by that site on the way to Oakton”. Real students who live in established Oakton neighborhoods should not be sent to Fairfax high in favor of this development. This push-back reveals that this development is REALLY important to someone at FCPS. Why? Why is that boundary being prioritized over established neighborhoods? The trip from the AT&T site to Fairfax high is straight down 123, then left on 50. Super. Efficient. Bussing. It is also a straight shot (2.4 miles away) to Katherine Johnson middle school. By contrast, Thoreau is 6.4 miles away, on the other side of Vienna. So what makes more sense for that site? Option 1: Oakton/Thoreau/Oakton, or Option 2: Oakton/Katherine Johnson/Fairfax High? |
Look at Google maps. Compare options 1 and 2. You will see that the “basis” for moving Waples is not applying the same metrics to the lot with the vacant commercial building.
A new development could establish new traditions and connections, locally, with Oakton/Katherine Johnson/Fairfax High. Those schools are right down the road from the new development. The development, Oakton Elementary and Oakton/Katherine Johnson are all close together. Isn’t that the goal of this review? Waples could maintain its established community connections with no boundary change. Why is this option a problem? |
Oakton momma going crazy!!! |