Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Can I just ask if anyone thinks any of rose hanburys kids may be / are likely Williams?

I read she got engaged, married, and announced a pregnancy in 3 days

[Anonymous]

My new theory - she has Bell’s Palsey and they are waiting for it to redolve

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

It's weird that you can't abide princess worship but have a knee jerk response to any perceived duke and duchess slight. Is duke and duchess worship more tolerable?

I really don't care about H&M. I thought the South Park sketch about them was hilarious. What's disturbing is watching you spew actual venom even when there's solid evidence they had nothing to do with the recent KP troubles. Your hatred of them goes way beyond what you're accusing the idle speculators here of.

Then you might Really enjoy the South Park bit on William and Kate. I always wondered who SP appealed to.


https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/us-celebrity-news/south-park-even-more-savage-29244710

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My new theory - she has Bell’s Palsey and they are waiting for it to redolve

They woul not have made the initial announcement the way they did if that were the case.

[Anonymous]

The one truth we know is that the press in TRF is planted and targeted. Who’s getting the positive press and who is getting negative press right now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My new theory - she has Bell’s Palsey and they are waiting for it to redolve

They woul not have made the initial announcement the way they did if that were the case.

A photo from the side profile would’ve solved the issue. Her watching the kids play would’ve done nicely for a Mother’s Day image. Maybe even taken from a window inside looking out. Rather than crop and shop a terrible photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

DP - Because Harry is only TWO adults away.

I’m not sure if it’s considered a “succession” issue, but with Charles ill, if William were to be unavailable for some reason, the adults next in line as potential regents for George are Harry and Andrew. I can imagine Charles wanting to firm up any issues with the Counsellors of State as well. I also think that it might be wise to figure out a formal way to include Anne in the mix — if she wants to be there. I’m guessing that she’s one of the most universally respected of the bunch.

DP. This makes sense. God forbid anything should happen to William, but if something does then we're looking at Andrew and Harry. Everybody likes Anne.

[Anonymous]

How can you tell who or how many are posting what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How can you tell who or how many are posting what?

They can't. They just think their guesses are right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

It's weird that you can't abide princess worship but have a knee jerk response to any perceived duke and duchess slight. Is duke and duchess worship more tolerable?

I really don't care about H&M. I thought the South Park sketch about them was hilarious. What's disturbing is watching you spew actual venom even when there's solid evidence they had nothing to do with the recent KP troubles. Your hatred of them goes way beyond what you're accusing the idle speculators here of.

There's more than one poster here. Just noticing your blatant hypocrisy, Duchess Worshipper.

There are two of you disrupting every page of this thread. And, ironically, contributing significantly to its length.

Are you constitutionally incapable of just not responding to anything you disagree with? Are you really unable to hold back from insulting people in every one of your posts? Are you 12 and on spring break?

Could say the same of you. But it's odd that someone who doesn't know much or supposedly care about Harry and Meghan was real quick to point out whether or not a statement attributed to them was actually said. You could just not reply but I'm sure you will since at least 150 of these pages are you repeating yourself.

I was on the Daily Mail (blushes) and saw it. It took me all of a minute to post a link here. Which you ignored, because your hatred for them won't be mollified by actual facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there actually any real updates after the back of head car photo of Kate and William? Seems like there's been no real update since then.

She’s out until Easter. Expect the next update then.

Expect an update by Easter. We shall see. In the meantime there will likely be another 300 pages of repeated postings. I don’t even read it all anymore. I did the first 300 or so pages. Now I jump to the last page and read a few posts and leave. You?

Hun, the entire planet is rapidly discussing this. EVERYONE. it isn't just a DCUM thing.

The downfall of the internet.

When I mentioned this situation (Kate's surgery, the picture);at work, no one has heard of it. Also, they said they don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The @BBC Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell after another long night in the rain outside
@KensingtonRoyal

"King Charles informs me that a new plan for succession is being drafted. More than that I cannot say. My lips continue to be tightly sealed"

https://twitter.com/AndrewPMunro/status/1768619227269771507

They're exaggerated what Witchell said about succession as if it's for Rose kid lol. I think it's more to do with a just in case dealing with Charles cancer.

Maybe to remove Catherine’s name as Queen. There’s likely numerous documents to update if a divorce is imminent.

She may have told him before the surgery to do what he must/say what he must and while she recovered they may not be on speaking terms hence the crap photo and faked apology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The @BBC Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell after another long night in the rain outside
@KensingtonRoyal

"King Charles informs me that a new plan for succession is being drafted. More than that I cannot say. My lips continue to be tightly sealed"

https://twitter.com/AndrewPMunro/status/1768619227269771507

They're exaggerated what Witchell said about succession as if it's for Rose kid lol. I think it's more to do with a just in case dealing with Charles cancer.

Maybe to remove Catherine’s name as Queen. There’s likely numerous documents to update if a divorce is imminent.

She may have told him before the surgery to do what he must/say what he must and while she recovered they may not be on speaking terms hence the crap photo and faked apology.

Huh. William has been doing a lousy job of signaling and preparing the public for a divorce.

Maybe, just maybe, a divorce is not imminent. How crazy would that be? No divorce! Whoa!

[Anonymous]

I can't believe all the conspiracy theories you people fell for when the obvious answer is that she is transitioning to a man and needs time for everything to settle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there actually any real updates after the back of head car photo of Kate and William? Seems like there's been no real update since then.

She’s out until Easter. Expect the next update then.

Expect an update by Easter. We shall see. In the meantime there will likely be another 300 pages of repeated postings. I don’t even read it all anymore. I did the first 300 or so pages. Now I jump to the last page and read a few posts and leave. You?

Hun, the entire planet is rapidly discussing this. EVERYONE. it isn't just a DCUM thing.

The downfall of the internet.

When I mentioned this situation (Kate's surgery, the picture);at work, no one has heard of it. Also, they said they don't care.

The gay guys in my office are all over it, and so is my Britain-loving boss. I work in a really quantitative field, fwiw.