Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When are you folks going to realize no one is posting any new information, people are just uploading and circulating the same tired rumors and conspiracy theories claiming they have insider information because it gets them clicks and money.

We likely have at least 2 more weeks before we get anything new to talk about depending on if Kate is able to attend Easter events.

This!

You two are responsible for 1/3 of the posts here. When are you going to realize that you're responsible for a large share of this thread's length?

DP. I am neither of the above two posters. It's kind of sad that you assume only two people here disagree with you.

Not the point. The point is, why are you contributing massively to the page count of this thread you supposedly want to see die?

"Massively"? I think you're referring to the person - probably you - who is rabidly posting (contributing massively) even though there have been zero updates and there's nothing to post about. It's just an excuse for YOU to bump this idiotic thread. As for me, obviously this thread isn't going to die because of people like you, so I'm just going to enjoy the trainwreck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

It's weird that you can't abide princess worship but have a knee jerk response to any perceived duke and duchess slight. Is duke and duchess worship more tolerable?

I really don't care about H&M. I thought the South Park sketch about them was hilarious. What's disturbing is watching you spew actual venom even when there's solid evidence they had nothing to do with the recent KP troubles. Your hatred of them goes way beyond what you're accusing the idle speculators here of.

There's more than one poster here. Just noticing your blatant hypocrisy, Duchess Worshipper.

There are two of you disrupting every page of this thread. And, ironically, contributing significantly to its length.

Are you constitutionally incapable of just not responding to anything you disagree with? Are you really unable to hold back from insulting people in every one of your posts? Are you 12 and on spring break?

Could say the same of you. But it's odd that someone who doesn't know much or supposedly care about Harry and Meghan was real quick to point out whether or not a statement attributed to them was actually said. You could just not reply but I'm sure you will since at least 150 of these pages are you repeating yourself.

I was on the Daily Mail (blushes) and saw it. It took me all of a minute to post a link here. Which you ignored, because your hatred for them won't be mollified by actual facts.

I'm not 'ignoring' anything b/c I'm not the PP you think you're responding to. But you're obviously biased but think you're fooling everyone by saying you liked that one SP episode.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The @BBC Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell after another long night in the rain outside
@KensingtonRoyal

"King Charles informs me that a new plan for succession is being drafted. More than that I cannot say. My lips continue to be tightly sealed"

https://twitter.com/AndrewPMunro/status/1768619227269771507

They're exaggerated what Witchell said about succession as if it's for Rose kid lol. I think it's more to do with a just in case dealing with Charles cancer.

Maybe to remove Catherine’s name as Queen. There’s likely numerous documents to update if a divorce is imminent.

She may have told him before the surgery to do what he must/say what he must and while she recovered they may not be on speaking terms hence the crap photo and faked apology.

But Kate isn't in the line of succession at all, is she? So why would she be in the succession documents in the first place? Is there really any question of her acting as regent instead of (gag) Andrew, Harry, or best of all Anne?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are there actually any real updates after the back of head car photo of Kate and William? Seems like there's been no real update since then.

She’s out until Easter. Expect the next update then.

Expect an update by Easter. We shall see. In the meantime there will likely be another 300 pages of repeated postings. I don’t even read it all anymore. I did the first 300 or so pages. Now I jump to the last page and read a few posts and leave. You?

Hun, the entire planet is rapidly discussing this. EVERYONE. it isn't just a DCUM thing.

The downfall of the internet.

When I mentioned this situation (Kate's surgery, the picture);at work, no one has heard of it. Also, they said they don't care.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The @BBC Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell after another long night in the rain outside
@KensingtonRoyal

"King Charles informs me that a new plan for succession is being drafted. More than that I cannot say. My lips continue to be tightly sealed"

https://twitter.com/AndrewPMunro/status/1768619227269771507

They're exaggerated what Witchell said about succession as if it's for Rose kid lol. I think it's more to do with a just in case dealing with Charles cancer.

Maybe to remove Catherine’s name as Queen. There’s likely numerous documents to update if a divorce is imminent.

She may have told him before the surgery to do what he must/say what he must and while she recovered they may not be on speaking terms hence the crap photo and faked apology.

OMG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

I know absolutely nothing about royals - but what if something happened to William before George comes of age?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can I just ask if anyone thinks any of rose hanburys kids may be / are likely Williams?

I read she got engaged, married, and announced a pregnancy in 3 days

Yes. Check out the tldr thread. There are links related to that rumor. I had never heard them before but apparently it’s not a new rumor.

[Anonymous]

Shingles is stress related, painful, and unsightly.

Post-surgery shingles.

What do I win if I’m correct?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

I know absolutely nothing about royals - but what if something happened to William before George comes of age?

According to the Regents Act, Harry would step in as regent until George turns 18. However, the Act also says that the regent must be domiciled in the U.K., so Harry couldn’t phone it in from California.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can you tell who or how many are posting what?

There are two posters who are emotionally enmeshed with Kate. And multiple posters, I don't think anybody can tell how many, who are here out of fascination about the photo screw-up or for the mystery-solving.

DP. Sticking up for someone when they're being bullied is hardly "emotionally enmeshed." And again, funny that you think only two people have outed you as the queen bee of the DCUM Mean Girls.

LOL, I've posted very little on this thread.

Not engaging with you any more, you're as vicious as you are sycophantic to the BRF. I'm sure Kate appreciates your pit bull service on her behalf.

Speaking of vicious... tell us more about how Kate and William are "getting a divorce," or about his "affair," or their "illegitimate children" or her "eating disorder." We'll wait.

OK, back to say this: the vast majority of us don't believe the divorce, affair, or illegitimate children rumors. It's only your hate-filled, fevered imagination that blames those rumors on every poster here and translates it into spittle the rest of us have to wipe off our laptop screens.

DP. That's a convenient way to indulge in toxicity. "Sure, we're saying toxic things. But we don't believe them so it's okay."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Shingles is stress related, painful, and unsightly.

Post-surgery shingles.

What do I win if I’m correct?

I had shingles. I could have faked a happy picture with a stylist and photographer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

I know absolutely nothing about royals - but what if something happened to William before George comes of age?

He becomes king but a regent is appointed until he is 18. The regent is the next adult in the line of succession. That's Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

I know absolutely nothing about royals - but what if something happened to William before George comes of age?

According to the Regents Act, Harry would step in as regent until George turns 18. However, the Act also says that the regent must be domiciled in the U.K., so Harry couldn’t phone it in from California.

So then it goes to Andrew, and that's unthinkable.

Anne seems like a great candidate. Edward is also stable at least, although he's very inexperienced and may not have the personality or stamina for it.

This sounds like Charles just making the normal preparations anyone would make before major surgery. Except while the rest of us write wills, he needs to plan out the succession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

Maybe William as Regent if Charles needs to step back (but not abdicate) from his duties temporarily?

Like George IV when George III became incapacitated.

That makes sense. Now saying the cancer is serious and they're lying but depending on his treatment he may be down for some time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

I know absolutely nothing about royals - but what if something happened to William before George comes of age?

According to the Regents Act, Harry would step in as regent until George turns 18. However, the Act also says that the regent must be domiciled in the U.K., so Harry couldn’t phone it in from California.

So then it goes to Andrew, and that's unthinkable.

Anne seems like a great candidate. Edward is also stable at least, although he's very inexperienced and may not have the personality or stamina for it.

This sounds like Charles just making the normal preparations anyone would make before major surgery. Except while the rest of us write wills, he needs to plan out the succession.

Charles can't amend the Regency Act. Only Parliament can do that.