Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The @BBC Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell after another long night in the rain outside
@KensingtonRoyal

"King Charles informs me that a new plan for succession is being drafted. More than that I cannot say. My lips continue to be tightly sealed"

https://twitter.com/AndrewPMunro/status/1768619227269771507

Is this quote real?

Nicholas Witchell has broken many stories about the royal family over the years but King Charles famously does not like him so why would Charles himself be confiding in Witchell. Also Witchell was supposed to retire in ealry 2024, so I don't know that he's even on the job anymore. Sounds odd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people who think there are marriage troubles or divorcing have likely been following/visiting certain other places that are champions of the American wing of the Royal Family.

Not really William would have to be a pretty remarkable person to move from generations of cheating and his parents trainwreck of a marriage to a happy, fully monogamous marriage. And I don’t think they are divorcing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

It's weird that you can't abide princess worship but have a knee jerk response to any perceived duke and duchess slight. Is duke and duchess worship more tolerable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

That’s definitely possible in case of plane/car accident situation with William and kids

[Anonymous]

The quote about King Charles revamping the line of succession is not true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

That would be the most chaotic move in this moment. Just burn it all down I guess.

[Anonymous]

Charles can’t add or remove people from line of succession.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The quote about King Charles revamping the line of succession is not true.

Probably not but he might be working on stepping down temporarily or permanently. If the rumors about his cancer are true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

That’s definitely possible in case of plane/car accident situation with William and kids

William and George are never in the same car/place. Royal requirement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Meghan (and Harry) issued a formal statement on the issue? Are they worried about Kate?

No statements from the Middletons (uncle Gary doesn’t count), none from any of William’s relatives either.

I don’t believe in the outside baby/hoing Wills and Rose/Wills beats the living sh!t out of Kate fantasies enjoyed by the beautiful people here, so I assume William likes Kate enough to have made very clear to stupid Harry that making public comments about anyone in William’s family won’t work well for Harry. He is an unusually cruel in-law to Kate, and normal adults would find a lot of his antics unforgivable.

Why does princess worship require hating H&M? H&M have issued a statement saying they had nothing to do with the public comments about Meghan not making the statements attributed to her re the photo. This was linked to above, you just choose never to see anything they do in a good light.

It's weird that you can't abide princess worship but have a knee jerk response to any perceived duke and duchess slight. Is duke and duchess worship more tolerable?

I really don't care about H&M. I thought the South Park sketch about them was hilarious. What's disturbing is watching you spew actual venom even when there's solid evidence they had nothing to do with the recent KP troubles. Your hatred of them goes way beyond what you're accusing the idle speculators here of.

[Anonymous]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1768744321115635764

[Anonymous]

William learned from his father that he could divorce and get his preferred side piece legitimized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can one of the royal watchers explain to me why Charles is making succession plans? I thought that was all totally spelled out already

To kick Harry out of it

Harry is four people away. Who cares about him in succession?

DP - Because Harry is only TWO adults away.

I’m not sure if it’s considered a “succession” issue, but with Charles ill, if William were to be unavailable for some reason, the adults next in line as potential regents for George are Harry and Andrew. I can imagine Charles wanting to firm up any issues with the Counsellors of State as well. I also think that it might be wise to figure out a formal way to include Anne in the mix — if she wants to be there. I’m guessing that she’s one of the most universally respected of the bunch.