Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Royal Twitter has been talking abt this for ages. Just showed up in the news. Meghan and Harry call a super fan that runs pro H&M account that regularly posts terrible things about Kate, such as “anorexic wrinkly hoe”...I thought they were against online bullying?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12407454/harry-meghan-phone-fan-twitter-troll-royals/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Royal Twitter has been talking abt this for ages. Just showed up in the news. Meghan and Harry call a super fan that runs pro H&M account that regularly posts terrible things about Kate, such as “anorexic wrinkly hoe”...I thought they were against online bullying?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12407454/harry-meghan-phone-fan-twitter-troll-royals/

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1294398114590273536?s=21

This twitter thread has the receipts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Royal Twitter has been talking abt this for ages. Just showed up in the news. Meghan and Harry call a super fan that runs pro H&M account that regularly posts terrible things about Kate, such as “anorexic wrinkly hoe”...I thought they were against online bullying?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12407454/harry-meghan-phone-fan-twitter-troll-royals/

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1294398114590273536?s=21

This twitter thread has the receipts

those Meghan fans are serious bullies. i'm glad they got called out but surprised Harry and Meghan support them - don't they have handlers that do some due diligence before they dive into stuff?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will Harry do in California? Is he legal to work in California?

How will Harry support the family?

Living off Pop.

yep. Plus his inheritance from his mom and his inheritance from the queen mum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Royal Twitter has been talking abt this for ages. Just showed up in the news. Meghan and Harry call a super fan that runs pro H&M account that regularly posts terrible things about Kate, such as “anorexic wrinkly hoe”...I thought they were against online bullying?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12407454/harry-meghan-phone-fan-twitter-troll-royals/

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1294398114590273536?s=21

This twitter thread has the receipts

Did you even read the article? I don’t think you did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Royal Twitter has been talking abt this for ages. Just showed up in the news. Meghan and Harry call a super fan that runs pro H&M account that regularly posts terrible things about Kate, such as “anorexic wrinkly hoe”...I thought they were against online bullying?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12407454/harry-meghan-phone-fan-twitter-troll-royals/

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1294398114590273536?s=21

This twitter thread has the receipts

those Meghan fans are serious bullies. i'm glad they got called out but surprised Harry and Meghan support them - don't they have handlers that do some due diligence before they dive into stuff?

i don't think they have people checking things for them, they have had some trouble in the past.

I also think for the most part Meghan and Harry tend to navel gaze a bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take is that first and foremost Harry desired a family of his own, and will make them his priority, always.

That being said, his royal standing was a gilded cage to be sure, but he had decided to use his platform to put good in the world and connect to people.

Hiding away in an L.A. mansion is not what he wanted, but the wife and son with him are what he wanted most.

He is making a compromise that probably feels right some days and misguided on others. For someone who never got to make choices of his own, this is new territory.

I think they made the best choice for their child and future children. The British press were relentless against Meghan in the short 2 years she was resident in the U.K. and they had a terrible track record with protecting Diana or Fergie. Beatrice and Eugenie were also cannonfodder in the 90s.

This way the Sussex children are raised in a safe and happy environment without the pressure of being torn apart every time they step outside in Britain.

I'm so happy for them.

Meh. So Harry and Meghan moved to California, to an offshoot of LA's glamorous world, as a safe place to raise their children? To escape from the paparazzi? Snorts with laughter. Yeah, right.

I've a feeling that Will and Kate's kids are going to have a much more secure and stable childhood and will be much more grounded in adulthood than any kid raised in the gilded bowl of Los Angeles.

To a dispassionate observer, Megan is taking Harry for a ride. She's used him to parlay herself from a B-list actress on a cable TV show to living in a 14 million mansion in Montecito. That was not accidental. The longer it goes on, the more apparent it is that Megan is shallow, self centered, ambitious - all for the glamorous A list celebrity world. In a way I have to admire her and the way she shimmered up the ladder. So far it's spectacularly successful. But she's also burned so many bridges along the way that if/when it collapses it'll be interesting to see where she lands.

Too bad Dominic Dunne still isn't alive. He'd have a massive field day with Ms. Megan Markle and her conquest of society.

This. She’s so transactional and climbing it’s sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take is that first and foremost Harry desired a family of his own, and will make them his priority, always.

That being said, his royal standing was a gilded cage to be sure, but he had decided to use his platform to put good in the world and connect to people.

Hiding away in an L.A. mansion is not what he wanted, but the wife and son with him are what he wanted most.

He is making a compromise that probably feels right some days and misguided on others. For someone who never got to make choices of his own, this is new territory.

I think they made the best choice for their child and future children. The British press were relentless against Meghan in the short 2 years she was resident in the U.K. and they had a terrible track record with protecting Diana or Fergie. Beatrice and Eugenie were also cannonfodder in the 90s.

This way the Sussex children are raised in a safe and happy environment without the pressure of being torn apart every time they step outside in Britain.

I'm so happy for them.

Sussex children? Doubt there will be any more.

DP. I would bet big money that she is already pregnant again. [/quoting]

If she’s playing her cards right, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re so gross. Biting the hand that feeds them with that sleazy book while accepting money from Daddy Prince Charles to buy a luxurious mansion. Couple of spoilt teenagers, except they’re practically middle-aged.

Agree. They are disgusting hypocrites. Playing victim while spouting off nastily about “social injustices” that have benefitted them every step of the way. Without the monarchy and his inherited titles and wealth, she’d be nothing but a washed up d list actress in a small apartment auditioning for small parts. Nothing about her is earned. She is no feminist, she has mooched off every man she has ever been involved with to climb to the top. And all of this conspicuous consumption on mega mansions while the entire world is suffering while they lecture. They don’t walk the talk. They are vile and I loathe them.

Joke and Woke, go back to the UK. Oh that’s right, they don’t want you either.

I haven’t heard that nn before for H&M. It’s perfect!

[Anonymous]

Gotta hand it to MM. She leaves Hollywood as a third rate actress on a barely watched show, married PH, and now slides back to Santa Barbara to a house that sounds lovely but way too expensive for a pair who really have no viable means of income save for what the BRF and Prince Charles will hand out to them. Sure, Harry has an inheritance from Diana but it wasn’t massive.

Guessing these two will downside in the next few years - and divorce shortly after. This isn’t for the long haul, that’s for sure.

[Anonymous]

Interesting op-Ed in the NYTs today: The British Monarchy Is a Game. Harry and Meghan Didn’t Want to Play.

Prince Harry confused sacrifice with service. Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, confused it with fame

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/opinion/finding-freedom-harry-meghan.html?referringSource=articleShare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting op-Ed in the NYTs today: The British Monarchy Is a Game. Harry and Meghan Didn’t Want to Play.

Prince Harry confused sacrifice with service. Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, confused it with fame

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/opinion/finding-freedom-harry-meghan.html?referringSource=articleShare

The op-ed is a little opaque but actually does capture the weird attitude of Britons toward the royals (I lived there for 5 years post college). Her point about how Kate is popular because she's silent is a good one, and does explain a lot about why Meghan has struggled so much. Being a royal truly is about being a figurehead and letting the public project their feelings about the country onto you. Anyone who tries to publicly be an individual gets dragged -- Diana, Fergie, Meghan.

Interestingly, I think Camilla has nailed the balance. She was fortunate to come to it late in life and never had to perform the role of princess for anyone. But she is someone who appears to have an actual personality and private life, but keeps it under wraps so that she can perform royal duties. She's publicly silent, but you get the sense that behind closed doors she feels comfortable in her own skin and not overly burdened by the public perception of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting op-Ed in the NYTs today: The British Monarchy Is a Game. Harry and Meghan Didn’t Want to Play.

Prince Harry confused sacrifice with service. Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, confused it with fame

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/opinion/finding-freedom-harry-meghan.html?referringSource=articleShare

The op-ed is a little opaque but actually does capture the weird attitude of Britons toward the royals (I lived there for 5 years post college). Her point about how Kate is popular because she's silent is a good one, and does explain a lot about why Meghan has struggled so much. Being a royal truly is about being a figurehead and letting the public project their feelings about the country onto you. Anyone who tries to publicly be an individual gets dragged -- Diana, Fergie, Meghan.

Interestingly, I think Camilla has nailed the balance. She was fortunate to come to it late in life and never had to perform the role of princess for anyone. But she is someone who appears to have an actual personality and private life, but keeps it under wraps so that she can perform royal duties. She's publicly silent, but you get the sense that behind closed doors she feels comfortable in her own skin and not overly burdened by the public perception of her.

Camilla was born into British high society, has moved in royal circles all her life and knows how the game is played. She has the confidence that comes with knowing she belongs. Apples and oranges to compare with the Sussex situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gotta hand it to MM. She leaves Hollywood as a third rate actress on a barely watched show, married PH, and now slides back to Santa Barbara to a house that sounds lovely but way too expensive for a pair who really have no viable means of income save for what the BRF and Prince Charles will hand out to them. Sure, Harry has an inheritance from Diana but it wasn’t massive.

Guessing these two will downside in the next few years - and divorce shortly after. This isn’t for the long haul, that’s for sure.

Harry received a larger inheritance from the Queen Mother than he got from Diana. And hasn’t he been living rent free his whole life? Not to say they have the funds to live a billionaire lifestyle but they could theoretically have paid for this house with harry’s cash on hands (which also makes sense as to how they got a mortgage on it).

[Anonymous]

I just don't see why anyone would find her talks inspirational. She did not experience racial profiling growing up and had a privileged life. Only dated and married white guys. When I first saw pictures of her, I had no idea that she was biracial. Now she and her lily white husband are experts in diversity? Give me a break.