Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

Probably. But that's on them. If they support autocracy they need to state it for the historical record.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The complaint notes White House lawyers were "already in discussion" about "how to treat the call because of the likelihood, in the officials' retelling, that they had witnessed the president abuse his office for personal gain."

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1177205863314087936?s=20

And after the ICIG and Acting DNI referred this to the DOJ as a criminal referral, Barr shut it down.

Barr is toast.

Barr "shut it down?" How do you know this?

“At the end of August, when two top intelligence officials asked a Justice Department lawyer whether a whistle-blower’s complaint should be forwarded to Congress, they were told no, Attorney General William P. Barr and his department could handle the criminal referral against the president of the United States.

About four weeks later, the department rendered its judgment: President Trump had not violated campaign finance laws when he urged Ukraine’s president to work with Mr. Barr to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/william-barr-trump-ukraine.html

And, this is not "Barr shutting it down." This is the department determining that there is "no there there."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

There will be no Senate vote because there will be no House vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

There will be no Senate vote because there will be no House vote.

Yeah. Trump will step down first.

[Anonymous]

Nunes is on the wrong side of history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The complaint notes White House lawyers were "already in discussion" about "how to treat the call because of the likelihood, in the officials' retelling, that they had witnessed the president abuse his office for personal gain."

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1177205863314087936?s=20

And after the ICIG and Acting DNI referred this to the DOJ as a criminal referral, Barr shut it down.

Barr is toast.

Barr "shut it down?" How do you know this?

“At the end of August, when two top intelligence officials asked a Justice Department lawyer whether a whistle-blower’s complaint should be forwarded to Congress, they were told no, Attorney General William P. Barr and his department could handle the criminal referral against the president of the United States.

About four weeks later, the department rendered its judgment: President Trump had not violated campaign finance laws when he urged Ukraine’s president to work with Mr. Barr to investigate a political rival, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/william-barr-trump-ukraine.html

And, this is not "Barr shutting it down." This is the department determining that there is "no there there."

That wasn't their call to make. And they ducked the important issues.

Good job, DOJ. Not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is on the wrong side of history.

He is such a worm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

There will be no Senate vote because there will be no House vote.

Correction. There will be no successful house vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is on the wrong side of history.

He's on the wrong side of a lot of things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is on the wrong side of history.

Does he actually believe what he's saying? I'm trying to give some measure of benefit of doubt, but he lost me within 6 seconds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will the Senate vote to convict be? I see it as falling a few votes short of 67.

Probably. But that's on them. If they support autocracy they need to state it for the historical record.

+1

I want to see them on the record

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

redacted whistleblower complaint

Oh FFS! He wasn’t even part of it. Democrats are just f g stupid.

I am not sure how anyone cn read this and come away with anything other than Barr, Trump and Pence need to be removed from ANY decisionmaking asap and Pompeo, Mulvney, Mnuchin need to answer questions, like today or tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is on the wrong side of history.

Does he actually believe what he's saying? I'm trying to give some measure of benefit of doubt, but he lost me within 6 seconds.

He's pretty dumb, but I don't think he's that dumb.

[Anonymous]

Seriously, read the full Whistleblower document and understand, it is offered under penalty of purjury nd at great risk to both the professional career and safety of self and family.

Then, road map it with names and dates. There are A LOT of witnesses, a full White House counsel cover-up of this AND OTHER MATTERS.

Add to it, Rudy acting as an envoy of the President and Barr acting as a legal interference.

There are facts to investigate, but it is all well documented.