Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sources say the CNN interview of Harris and Walz was originally 41 minutes long.

The Harris Campaign objected to over HALF of the interview being shown.

Release the transcripts!!!

yet it started at 9:00 eastern time and ended at 9:49 eastern time, with commercials. So, they pretty much showed all of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

He dedicated decades to the reserves. Good for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

He served in an e9 capacity for several months, but did not do the coursework to codify the rank, so when he retired, he retired at his previous grade. this is pretty well documented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dana Bash: "You've been VP for 3 and a half years. Why didn't you do this?"

Kamala: "We brought inflation down"

She's a walking Trump ad.

+1 Correct. Still cannot believe these are our choices. For me this comes down to the economy/business acumen, the border, and past performance on the world stage. Harris/Walz seem like deer in headlights.

Really?

Inflation is back down and Kroger and Walmat have admitted to their price gouging. Prices are still he, she has outlined her plans to address it. How are tariffs and exporting migrant workers going to keep prices down?

Trump killed the border bill that would deal with the pressing issues. Harris has said she would sign it. Has Trump? Meanwhile, border crossings are down to 2019 levels.

Performance on world stage: no one laughs at Biden/Harris the way they literally were at Trump. NATO has expanded and the US is no longer kowtowing to Putin and Xi. I am not sure why or how joining the ranks of authoritarian countries is good for our economy or democracy writ large.

Border crossings are down because this administration is flying 30k people per month directly into the country. Our services are not meant to handle this amount of people. That bill was not going to fix this. We need to deport the several million that came across recently.

While I think it was a terrible program, it was experimental between January to December 2023 and took in 320,000 immigrants. The government vetted asylum seekers in Honduras, Guatemala, Columbia, Venezuela, Haiti, and El Salvador. The country is no longer using that program, and the crossings are down. I have read that there is a new caravan on its way. I wonder how the administration will handle this new caravan.

I don't blame Harris. She was not in charge of the border, Biden and Mayorkas are responsible. It took Biden too long to change his position, but I am glad he has changed it. I hope Harris, in charge, will take her prosecutorial background and go after the border jumpers, cartels, and these migrant gangs. I want her to put somebody in charge of Homeland who can thread the needle between humanity and our country cannot absorb so many poor, uneducated people in such a short period of time. I also hope they put some conditions on these sanctuary cities. It is okay to be a sanctuary city that do not share law enforcement information with the feds. That's your state prerogative. However, it should also be the feds prerogative not to provide government assistance to those states for LEO activities. Some of these new migrants think America is soft and that American LEO is soft ASF.

Signed,
A Big Harris Supporter.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

Mans did the work (like a lot of us) for 24 years.

Unless you did as well please limit your comments to "Thank-you."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

Mans did the work (like a lot of us) for 24 years.

Unless you did as well please limit your comments to "Thank-you."

Are you a stolen valor too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know what I think is weird? The fact that Trump and Vance have NOT been together — and that Vance seems to be the one to clean up Trump’s messes (along with his own).

There’s an old joke about a man who works at the circus taking care of the elephants. Specifically. he has to clean up after them. Day in day out, until months become weeks becomes years. After awhile, he’s sick and tired of cleaning up elephant dung and he starts complaining. He hates what he’s doing and he lets everyone around him know it. One of his coworkers overhears him grumbling and says, well, if you don’t like it, why don’t you just quit. To which our hearty circus man replies: “What, and leave show business!?!”

It's either clean up donald's $&it or leave politics. Dollars to doughnuts, Vance figured Trump would die within a year or two and propel him into Oval Office. Vance is willing to wallow in the dung if it gets him the job he is drooling for.

[Anonymous]

Wow I finally got to watch the interview (unlike the right wingers here who obviously haven’t). What a sad commentary on the right wing lens-ification of media. They basically made their questions from Trump talking points.

Harris comes off well. I am glad to get to vote for her and am glad that our party doesn’t nominate empty treasonous suits like the GOP does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow I finally got to watch the interview (unlike the right wingers here who obviously haven’t). What a sad commentary on the right wing lens-ification of media. They basically made their questions from Trump talking points.

Harris comes off well. I am glad to get to vote for her and am glad that our party doesn’t nominate empty treasonous suits like the GOP does.

This was my observation as well. All the questions were literally things I have heard on this forum and on social media from MAGAts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Her replies didn’t have the depth or nuance I expected from someone who has been part of Biden administration for 3.5 years.

HAHAHAHAHA. When Trump is the alternative, this is pure gold. He is famous for his subtlety of thought and depth of knowledge. Hoo boy!

But we are supposed to assume that Harris is above that level, right?

Assume whatever you want. One or the other will be President, so we are necessarily grading on a curve. It doesn't matter how good or bad either of them are in an abstract or an objective sense; it matters only how they compare to one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow I finally got to watch the interview (unlike the right wingers here who obviously haven’t). What a sad commentary on the right wing lens-ification of media. They basically made their questions from Trump talking points.

Harris comes off well. I am glad to get to vote for her and am glad that our party doesn’t nominate empty treasonous suits like the GOP does.

This was my observation as well. All the questions were literally things I have heard on this forum and on social media from MAGAts.

Yup. Bash let the Trump campaign be her assignment editor. Sad.

[Anonymous]

This was not journalism and does very little to explain Harris policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

He served in an e9 capacity for several months, but did not do the coursework to codify the rank, so when he retired, he retired at his previous grade. this is pretty well documented.

Again-being frocked in anticipation that you will attend the SMA is not a promotion. The promotion occurs after successfully completing SMA. He served as an e9, made the e9 list, but was always an e8. That’s facts.

The coursework was attending SMA, which he either declined to do or dropped out of. He doesn’t specify which he did.

You don’t know what you are talking about. You don’t get promoted until you complete the coursework. He was never promoted to e9.

He wasn’t an e9 except in name for a few months. He wasn’t an e9 who was demoted to e8 at retirement; he was an e8 that acted as an e9 for a few months. He was never promoted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

Mans did the work (like a lot of us) for 24 years.

Unless you did as well please limit your comments to "Thank-you."

Are you a stolen valor too?

You are so mad that he has an impressive record of service.

Go be of service in some capacity. You might like it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for Tim Walz, “sometimes my grammar is wrong” is a rich excuse for lying.

If Trump said that, it would be mocked

Not really. He's such a fire hose of obvious, demonstrable lies, there's no point.

He used IVF as a term instead of IUI because IVF is something most people have heard of whereas IUI isn't.
He attained a rank and served in that capacity for months, and then retired, at the rank below.

These are not "lies" and certainly not like any of Trump's thousands of obvious lies.

He had "Command Sargent Major" stamped on his Congressional challenge coin. That's stolen valor. He claimed to have "carried a weapon of war, in war". That's stolen valor, not bad grammar.

That isn't stolen valor. He achieved the rank and served in the rank, but retired a rung lower.

He did not achieve e9. He wasn’t promoted to e9 then demoted at retirement. He never went beyond e8. He is a gross liar. You are an enabler.

He served in an e9 capacity for several months, but did not do the coursework to codify the rank, so when he retired, he retired at his previous grade. this is pretty well documented.

Again-being frocked in anticipation that you will attend the SMA is not a promotion. The promotion occurs after successfully completing SMA. He served as an e9, made the e9 list, but was always an e8. That’s facts.

The coursework was attending SMA, which he either declined to do or dropped out of. He doesn’t specify which he did.

You don’t know what you are talking about. You don’t get promoted until you complete the coursework. He was never promoted to e9.

He wasn’t an e9 except in name for a few months. He wasn’t an e9 who was demoted to e8 at retirement; he was an e8 that acted as an e9 for a few months. He was never promoted.

You don't know what YOU are talking about. He received the promotion - this is a fact, served in the role for several months, but then retired before completing the coursework. He formally retired in the earlier rank. This has all been long since documented and you are being obtuse about it.