Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative.

Hur made no diagnosis.
He stated what he observed. And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now.
And, it has only gotten worse. And, it will continue to get worse. His issues will NOT improve.
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself.

+1

They were quite germane given that was his reasoning for not charging him.

Bullshit. The report gave the reasons. Hur just smeared Biden so he won’t get kicked out of the Republican patronage network.

You’re pathetic. This came from Biden’s DOJ. The 25th Amendment needs to be invoked.

+1
Merrick Garland, darling of the left, *assigned* this to Hur. Democrats just can't bear to hear the truth.

MG is a registered Republican

Oh! I didn’t realize that. Well, I guess Biden is actually super sharp, then. Thanks for explaining!

DP. Garland is not a registered Republican. The PP was lying.

[Anonymous]

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aides have President Biden take the shorter stairs to board Air Force One. When it comes to news conferences, they yell loudly — and quickly — to end the questions, sometimes stealing a classic awards show tactic and playing loud music to signal the conclusion of the event. And forget about regular interviews with major news publications, including a traditional presidential sit-down on Super Bowl Sunday.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/10/us/politics/biden-white-house-aides.html

And that other guy wants to destroy the post world war 2 world order.
He wants to hand the globe to the Axis

Cite?

DP. Just ignore (or report) the twits who think they can deflect to Trump - on a Biden thread - anytime the discussion of Biden's decline gets too uncomfortable for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

THIS. I actually cringe every time he's talking to people who have lost loved ones and EVERY TIME has to bring up the death of his son. Way to make it all about you.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

THIS. I actually cringe every time he's talking to people who have lost loved ones and EVERY TIME has to bring up the death of his son. Way to make it all about you.
DP

Especially when a Military member died overseas and Biden starts in on his son dying. I am sure his son’s death was tragic and terrible, but he died in a hospital. Joe and his family could say their goodbyes and make sure Beau was cared for and treated with pain relief, etc. Military personnel who die from being blown up or any hostile action don’t have that kind of death. Two different things, both awful, but not the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

THIS. I actually cringe every time he's talking to people who have lost loved ones and EVERY TIME has to bring up the death of his son. Way to make it all about you.
DP

Especially when a Military member died overseas and Biden starts in on his son dying. I am sure his son’s death was tragic and terrible, but he died in a hospital. Joe and his family could say their goodbyes and make sure Beau was cared for and treated with pain relief, etc. Military personnel who die from being blown up or any hostile action don’t have that kind of death. Two different things, both awful, but not the same.

+100
So tone deaf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the people claiming Garland is a Republican, if true, I would add this up there as conclusive evidence that Biden is senile - who would put a member of the opposition party in charge of their own DOJ????? Talk about cognitive decline . . .

Because democrats are rank partisan aholes.
I know this is hard for dickheads like you to understand but give it a try
Democrats value bipartisanship. Their voters want them to come to consensus. They want them to reach across the aisle.
You don’t understand because democrats are fundamentally good people.

DP - did you mean GOP in the first line?

I have been thinking about your latter point recently: Dems really seem to try much harder to find compromise candidates that both sides can live with and to further bipartisan work as much as possible.

I do think many GOP are good people also but the military warfare approach to politics that military historian Newt Gingrich introduced in the late 90s and zeros has become gradually more extreme .

Many people want to see Congress much more functional and bipartisan rather than cheap point scoring and attack dog mode.

There is a podcast called The Focus Group.
It is just a deep dive into Republican focus groups and it is worth a listen.
It will inform your opinion regarding Republican interest in bipartisanship.

OK will check it out and hope it is not too depressing regarding hope for return to more of a bipartisan political culture …

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-focus-group-podcast/id1586423406

Thanks so much - very interesting listen.

Glimmers of hope here and there (mainly from the intelligent GOP staffer working on the Hill) but mostly as I feared - moving in the wrong direction.

Many Republicans in the focus groups (who were screened to have higher basic political knowledge than many Americans appeared to:
- approve of performative theater with no actual productive outcomes such as antics displayed by MTG and Freedom Caucus;
- approve of going after establishment Republicans as RINOs (“republican in name only” even though substantive policies are often similar to MAGA folks: only difference is if they crossed Trump)
- see Compromise as a dirty word.

It does not look hopeful unless we have a culture shift favoring dialogue and compromise.

[Anonymous]

Jill Biden's response to Hur in a fund raising email.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/11/jill-biden-special-counsel-report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

THIS. I actually cringe every time he's talking to people who have lost loved ones and EVERY TIME has to bring up the death of his son. Way to make it all about you.
DP

Especially when a Military member died overseas and Biden starts in on his son dying. I am sure his son’s death was tragic and terrible, but he died in a hospital. Joe and his family could say their goodbyes and make sure Beau was cared for and treated with pain relief, etc. Military personnel who die from being blown up or any hostile action don’t have that kind of death. Two different things, both awful, but not the same.

This is a childish, pathetic pissing match about who suffered more. Gross. The point is that Trump’s family is completely out of touch with the military and mocks them. Biden family can relate and respects them.

No, Military members who die in action in war are separate from people who doe from cancer. Both are tragic. But Beau Biden didn’t die in war. It’s not childish to point out the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aides have President Biden take the shorter stairs to board Air Force One. When it comes to news conferences, they yell loudly — and quickly — to end the questions, sometimes stealing a classic awards show tactic and playing loud music to signal the conclusion of the event. And forget about regular interviews with major news publications, including a traditional presidential sit-down on Super Bowl Sunday.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/10/us/politics/biden-white-house-aides.html

And that other guy wants to destroy the post world war 2 world order.
He wants to hand the globe to the Axis

Seriously. This can’t be said enough. There is no contest.

The Axis? Germany, Japan, and Italy are threatening NATO? Did you see that on CNN?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pretty amazing that he couldn’t remember when Beau died, considering that he mentions Beau EVERY TIME HE MEETS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A LOVED ONE DIE.

And, it's pretty rich that in Jill Biden's statement WRT the report, she said, "I can't imagine someone would try to use our son's death to score political points."
Especially since this is what Joe does all. the. time.

THIS. I actually cringe every time he's talking to people who have lost loved ones and EVERY TIME has to bring up the death of his son. Way to make it all about you.
DP

Especially when a Military member died overseas and Biden starts in on his son dying. I am sure his son’s death was tragic and terrible, but he died in a hospital. Joe and his family could say their goodbyes and make sure Beau was cared for and treated with pain relief, etc. Military personnel who die from being blown up or any hostile action don’t have that kind of death. Two different things, both awful, but not the same.

This is a childish, pathetic pissing match about who suffered more. Gross. The point is that Trump’s family is completely out of touch with the military and mocks them. Biden family can relate and respects them.

Biden called Military members “stupid b@stards, slow, and dull.” It’s a joke, right, calling Military members slow dull, and stupid b@stards is hilarious!

[Anonymous]

Whoever brought up "pissing match," maybe look in the mirror. You have countless threads about TFG to rage on, so quit deflecting here. This thread is about Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jill Biden's response to Hur in a fund raising email.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/11/jill-biden-special-counsel-report

I'm losing respect for Jill with every day that goes by. She needs to insist Biden step down, but she won't. It's really disgraceful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Biden's response to Hur in a fund raising email.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/11/jill-biden-special-counsel-report

I'm losing respect for Jill with every day that goes by. She needs to insist Biden step down, but she won't. It's really disgraceful.

She should insist her husband be prosecuted, his memory is fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Biden's response to Hur in a fund raising email.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/11/jill-biden-special-counsel-report

I'm losing respect for Jill with every day that goes by. She needs to insist Biden step down, but she won't. It's really disgraceful.

She should insist her husband be prosecuted, his memory is fine.

There isn’t evidence to support a prosecution. As has been stated in the report.