IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

SAR= Suspicious Activity Report

Please explain why so many Biden's--including grandchildren--were getting all those cash deposits of Big Bucks.

150 of those SAR's? Was that the number I read?

"More than 150."

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-oversight-republicans-suspicious-activity-report-efd53b27832e7031e522017f98e3d9d8

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

SAR= Suspicious Activity Report

Please explain why so many Biden's--including grandchildren--were getting all those cash deposits of Big Bucks.

150 of those SAR's? Was that the number I read?

Hunter and Jim had business partnerships with foreign businesses, a perfectly legal and normal thing for corporate lawyers and investment consultants to do. Investments, payments, retainers, etc. from foreign businesses trigger SARs reports. They were checked out and found to be legitimate business transactions. These are not new.

[Anonymous]

Hunter and Jim had business partnerships with foreign businesses, a perfectly legal and normal thing for corporate lawyers and investment consultants to do. Investments, payments, retainers, etc. from foreign businesses trigger SARs reports. They were checked out and found to be legitimate business transactions. These are not new.

source?

[Anonymous]

PP is just making stuff up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP is just making stuff up.

This whole thread is posters and republicans making things up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

No one with at least half a brain is going to argue with you about Joe being unfit to serve in the most powerful position in the world but as long as Trump is his competition in 2024, more people will choose the lesser of two evils by voting for Joe instead of the much more awful Trump. I can't say that I blame them.

So Putin taking advantage of a Dem President again is choosing the lesser or two evils? We are pretty much cruising to world war 3.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

No one with at least half a brain is going to argue with you about Joe being unfit to serve in the most powerful position in the world but as long as Trump is his competition in 2024, more people will choose the lesser of two evils by voting for Joe instead of the much more awful Trump. I can't say that I blame them.

So Putin taking advantage of a Dem President again is choosing the lesser or two evils? We are pretty much cruising to world war 3.

In what bizarro universe would Putin pick a Dem who in turn funds Putin's enemy and helps him destroy half of Russia's army? Put Putin at risk of getting nuked? Put Putin at risk of being toppled in a coup by his own mercenaries? And how is that Putin taking advantage of anyone?

[Anonymous]

Pretty much......

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pretty much......

+1

[Anonymous]

So, the owner and an executive at Burisma lobbied Hunter Biden to get "DC" involved to have Shokin fired.
And, son of a bit*h - that is exactly what happened.
Why would they want to fire a prosecutor that WASN'T investigating them?????


"Mykola Zlochevsky, theowner of Burisma, and Vadym Pozharski,an executive of Burisma, placed constant pressure on Hunter Biden to get help from
D.C. regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor,Viktor Shokin. Shokin was investigating Burisma for corruption. Hunter Biden, along with Zlochevsky and Pozharski,
"called D.C." to discuss the matter. Biden,Zlochevsky, and Pozharski stepped away tomake the call."

[Anonymous]

Right wing media is flailing and trying to spin and trying to paint Goldman as being dishonest about the testimony, but here's the problem... even insurrectionist MAGA Republican Andy Biggs came out of the hearing with THE SAME TAKEAWAY on the Archer testimony as Rep Goldman.

There was NO bribery, and NO discussion of business deals between Hunter and Joe.

Devon Archer was a big fail, where it comes to the GOP smears and conspiracy theories attacking Joe Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

SAR= Suspicious Activity Report

Please explain why so many Biden's--including grandchildren--were getting all those cash deposits of Big Bucks.

150 of those SAR's? Was that the number I read?

Hunter and Jim had business partnerships with foreign businesses, a perfectly legal and normal thing for corporate lawyers and investment consultants to do. Investments, payments, retainers, etc. from foreign businesses trigger SARs reports. They were checked out and found to be legitimate business transactions. These are not new.

Just for clarification:

CTR’s are files for any currency transactions over $10k. It could be an old lady depositing her social security checks valued over $10k. Nothing inherently suspicious about them.

AML monitoring/alerts at banks: these are what trigger “unusual” activities for further review by AML analysts

SARs: these are “Intel” reports written by AML analysts at banks that are filed with FinCEN after they have reviewed transactional records and deem the activity to be “suspicious”

And by “banks”, I mean any financial institution (which technically includes car dealerships, MSB’s and casinos)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right wing media is flailing and trying to spin and trying to paint Goldman as being dishonest about the testimony, but here's the problem... even insurrectionist MAGA Republican Andy Biggs came out of the hearing with THE SAME TAKEAWAY on the Archer testimony as Rep Goldman.

There was NO bribery, and NO discussion of business deals between Hunter and Joe.

Devon Archer was a big fail, where it comes to the GOP smears and conspiracy theories attacking Joe Biden.

The fact that the republicans won’t produce the transcript tells you everything you need to know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right wing media is flailing and trying to spin and trying to paint Goldman as being dishonest about the testimony, but here's the problem... even insurrectionist MAGA Republican Andy Biggs came out of the hearing with THE SAME TAKEAWAY on the Archer testimony as Rep Goldman.

There was NO bribery, and NO discussion of business deals between Hunter and Joe.

Devon Archer was a big fail, where it comes to the GOP smears and conspiracy theories attacking Joe Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Right wing media is flailing and trying to spin and trying to paint Goldman as being dishonest about the testimony, but here's the problem... even insurrectionist MAGA Republican Andy Biggs came out of the hearing with THE SAME TAKEAWAY on the Archer testimony as Rep Goldman.

There was NO bribery, and NO discussion of business deals between Hunter and Joe.

Devon Archer was a big fail, where it comes to the GOP smears and conspiracy theories attacking Joe Biden.

The fact that the republicans won’t produce the transcript tells you everything you need to know.

WTH?
How often does the transcript of a transcribed interview come out within hours of the interview?
They will make it public when it is reviewed and redacted.

I'm old enough to remember Schiff withholding dozens of transcripts.