IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Ok Dan...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dan, football, etc.

Fixed

Yikes, Goldman looking very shaky here.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

[Anonymous]

I don't know what the big deal is.

I routinely call my father and put him on speaker phone to discuss the weather and other niceties during my business meetings.
Doesn't everyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

No one with at least half a brain is going to argue with you about Joe being unfit to serve in the most powerful position in the world but as long as Trump is his competition in 2024, more people will choose the lesser of two evils by voting for Joe instead of the much more awful Trump. I can't say that I blame them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

Oh you could post those recorded phone calls? TYA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

There are several things in that X-crement that were disproven 4 years ago, including the premise. Shokin wasn’t investigating Burisma. Joe did not do anything for Burisma. If you are still pushing Burisma, you are hopeless.

[Anonymous]

Again, Trump's own DOJ and FBI investigated all this and...nothing.

You've had at least five years to come up with solid evidence - not hearsay, not conjecture, not "whistle blowers" with no direct knowledge. You've got nothing, which is why all of this is playing out in Congressional hearings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

The VAST majority of American people have ZERO SARs in their lifetime. The Bidens have over 150.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the transcript?

Patience, grasshopper.
3-4 days.

And once it becomes clear all the blue checks were lying you guys will be on to the next shiny object. They know exactly how to play you guys and you still haven’t figured it out.

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.
Good call guys. 👍

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

The VAST majority of American people have ZERO SARs in their lifetime. The Bidens have over 150.

True but at the same time, the vast majority of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck and don't have nearly enough money to even trigger. How many do you suppose the Bush's or Trumps have? I would guess 3/4 figures of them. It isn't as big if a deal as you are making it out to be.

[Anonymous]

SARs are not evidence of wrong doing. They are evidence of large (10,000 or more) transactions. Anyone has them if they are moving money to make a payment or buy something of high value, like a house or car. Same with wire transactions. I am not saying Hunter is "clean" but just having the things you are listing does not make someone sketchy or a criminal.

SAR= Suspicious Activity Report

Please explain why so many Biden's--including grandchildren--were getting all those cash deposits of Big Bucks.

150 of those SAR's? Was that the number I read?