Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do you need a gun so badly?

They are afraid of everything, especially black men’s penuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ban men.

Can we stop with this? Do you have a father? Brother? Son? Grandfather? Uncle? Any male acquaintance?

I have all of those. Ban men.

I happen to love the men in my life and the women are the aholes.

They might be aholes but they're not shooting up elementary schools I can promise you that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To be clear, the only evidence that this roommate was trans was a Snapchat filter he used to make himself into an anime character. That's all they've got.

Yes, are people buying that this is a trans person? Ok. Just watch his TikTok vids and it shows an average young guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a purge night for political nut jobs on both sides would be perfect to weed out some of the extremism out there

Ah yes! Both side-ism. Gtfoh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ban men.

Can we stop with this? Do you have a father? Brother? Son? Grandfather? Uncle? Any male acquaintance?

I have all of those. Ban men.

I happen to love the men in my life and the women are the aholes.

They might be aholes but they're not shooting up elementary schools I can promise you that.

No they just kill everyone with their backstabbing, conniving bull$hit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thread is so sad. Regular people trying to blame the other party for everything. This is what the millionaires want. They want us to hate each other in order for them to control us. Don’t give them that pleasure.

When did we live each other . Spare me the kumbaya nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do you need a gun so badly?

They are afraid of everything, especially black men’s penuses.

Yes they need guns to fight off intruders, crop thieves, and Mexican landscaper gang members.

[Anonymous]

It appears he was deeply steeped in his online life. He immediately took to his Discord chat group to joke about the murder.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/us/kirk-killing-suspect-online-chat.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It appears he was deeply steeped in his online life. He immediately took to his Discord chat group to joke about the murder.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/us/kirk-killing-suspect-online-chat.html

Well duh, and he also had access to any gun he wanted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thread is so sad. Regular people trying to blame the other party for everything. This is what the millionaires want. They want us to hate each other in order for them to control us. Don’t give them that pleasure.

Uh, it started when the President and the FBI director falsely claimed the shooter was a trans person and digressed from there as facts about the shooter came out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ban men.

Can we stop with this? Do you have a father? Brother? Son? Grandfather? Uncle? Any male acquaintance?

I have all of those. Ban men.

I happen to love the men in my life and the women are the aholes.

They might be aholes but they're not shooting up elementary schools I can promise you that.

No they just kill everyone with their backstabbing, conniving bull$hit.

Aww did a woman hurt your feefees? And now you're complaining about it online? Should we check your browser history? Should we call the FBI?

Thanks for proving my point. Sad little boys are ruining this country. I don't know if you understand this so I'll spell it out. Words and hurt feelings don't actually kill people. Men with guns do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps we should shift our focus onto Tyler’s parents who thought is was perfectly acceptable to probide their young child with machine guns rather than blaming a possibly trans roomate?

Machine guns?

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ban men.

Can we stop with this? Do you have a father? Brother? Son? Grandfather? Uncle? Any male acquaintance?

I have all of those. Ban men.

I happen to love the men in my life and the women are the aholes.

They might be aholes but they're not shooting up elementary schools I can promise you that.

No they just kill everyone with their backstabbing, conniving bull$hit.

Aww did a woman hurt your feefees? And now you're complaining about it online? Should we check your browser history? Should we call the FBI?

Thanks for proving my point. Sad little boys are ruining this country. I don't know if you understand this so I'll spell it out. Words and hurt feelings don't actually kill people. Men with guns do.

I am a woman, I am in support of gun control, and I am not blaming males for everything bad that happens. Sorry it doesn’t fit your narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears he was deeply steeped in his online life. He immediately took to his Discord chat group to joke about the murder.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/us/kirk-killing-suspect-online-chat.html

Well duh, and he also had access to any gun he wanted.

As do most adults in the US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A Virginia anesthesiologist was fired after making "highly inappropriate comments supporting violence" against Charlie Kirk following his assassination, according to Riverside Walter Reed Hospital. The employee's contract was terminated by North American Partners in Anesthesia.

Hmmm another one of these articles that doesn’t actually include the post in question.

The employer in that article didn’t release the anesthesiologist’s name.

But here’s a different anesthesiologist who said she is glad Charlie Kirk got himself shot. She is not a bot.

When Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, some conservatives openly celebrated her passing. A right-wing commentator called her a “mass murdering hag” who had “ruined more lives than Hitler, Mao & Stalin combined.” Another conservative pastor framed her death as “celestially ordained” and proclaimed, “This belongs to God.” Gordon Klingenschmitt, an evangelical activist and former Republican lawmaker, said he mourned only that she “apparently did not know Christ,” making clear he saw her death as spiritually justified. Even within Republican circles, Trump aides were quoted privately saying her death was “super” in terms of political impact, treating her passing less as a tragedy and more as an opportunity.

Unclear if the above examples are public figures with large followers base, a show, income from it, etc. Or just a little jerk from podunk online.

As you know, with the internet, everyone and anyone can post whatever. And opinions are like a-holes, everyone’s got one.

So what's your point, not following.

Your claim: a pastor somewhere said this, some commentator said that.

Other person: unclear if your commentators are big names or podunk people. Everyone has an opinion, whose do you follow?

And RBG she lived an awesome life so lots to celebrate.
Unf Obama didn’t replace her in a timely manner….

I am still lost because why does if they are big names or not matter, I still don't get the point.

Lol. You don’t have a point now nor when you quote a bunch of randos.

You were the one claiming random people and notable people were celebrating C.K.'s death. Random people and notable people celebrated R.B.G. death. So that is why I am confused by your follow up to mine 100%. Why does it matter that they are random (and they are not actually, but again, accordingly to you originally, it doesn't matter). If people can celebrate one, why not the other?

Ruth bader Ginsburg wasn’t shot to death at work. She was in her mid 80s and got ill. Wtf

Both Charlie and ruth had many accomplishments to celebrate. But one was 31 with young kids and shot to death on stage, and the other was old with great grandchildren and refused to retire.

So you're saying that Trump will fit into RBG's fact pattern and celebrations should be handled accordingly (i.e., ignored)?

Anyone who is upset about people celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death had better hold onto their MAGA hats when Trump passes (hopefully of natural causes with no foul play involved) because there will be widespread celebration. People already post on social media about the day when “it” happens. I’m actually concerned that even if he dies peacefully in his sleep at 90+, there will be people who will insist he was killed by radical leftists or the deep state.

But the right is prepping now to censor us from celebrating that when it happens. This stuff they are doing with C.K. is a test run.

But all the inappropriate or outright awful things the RWNJs post and say about Democrats or liberals dying or being attacked (Paul Pelosi was a particularly awful example) is all A-OK. When Biden passes away, do you think the RWNJs and their mouthpieces won't have a disgusting field day?