Fairfax County Double Murder
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Now that she can't bleach her hair in prison you know he's looking at her and thinking, "I did all that and gave up my whole life for that dog?" |
Anonymous
I would wait until the closing arguments . Remember- there can’t be a “mystery fourth party” who came in and did this. It is basically liked a locked room murder mystery- it had to be one of the people present. Juliana, Joe, or Brendan.i doubt anyone will believe it was Juliana acting alone since Brendan would have told the police immediately and the 911 calls make no sense with the Juliana theory. The next theory would be Joe, but the forensics make no sense with it being Joe, plus the 911 calls make no sense then either. Also, there is no motivation for Juliana to lie and say it was Brendan if it was actually Joe. The third theory is Brendan, and that’s where the forensics point, and that’s what Juliana testifies. Yes of course she could be lying and it could have been her- but if so, Brendan would be shouting from the rooftops that it was Juliana from the very start. And he has never said that. Basically the only theory that makes any sense is that it was Brendan. I can’t imagine a scenario where anyone would honestly believe different |
Anonymous
| Is the evidence for today out yet? |
Anonymous
The defense depends on Joe killing Christine. The messages show a consensual meet up. Why would he go nuts in the first 10 minutes when he's had no issues with many other meet ups? |
Anonymous
They can’t find anyone to paint joe as a killer since he wasn’t one . And if they did find someone willing to paint him that way, the prosecution could then call 836 rebuttal witnesses to testify the exact opposite. So that’s why. |
Anonymous
Why does someone keep writing “chargers”? Is that a typo or is that a thing in Virginia? |
Anonymous
| Any bets on who the witnesses are tomorrow? |
Anonymous
I do not personally know what it is, but I do believe we had people post about it on this thread fairly early on, before it was released in any media or public hearings. I’m assuming those people knew her. She also had some posts about it on her public Instagram, but she just showed some injuries from her activities and called it a “bleeding disorder.” One of those was definitely from one of the “mud runs” the defense tried to bring up. So I guess she was able to participate wising common sense, but probably wouldn’t have told someone it’s fine to cut her with a knife. |
Anonymous
+1. The state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable, not all, doubt. |
Anonymous
No way. Quick guilty. Even having a trial is as delulu of him as thinking he would get away with the murders. |
Anonymous
They just need to create "doubt." |
Anonymous
| Her phone being in a kitchen drawer needs to be a key point emphasized in closing arguments. |
Anonymous
|
What did Brendan do before he worked for the IRS? Anyone know?
|
Anonymous
| Has there ever been a more boring trial? |
Anonymous
|
Bunch of letters were admitted today. I haven't read all of them, just skimmed a few. These are the ones she wrote to Tess
https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%204.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%208.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%2011.pdf https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%202.pdf And her communications with Kate Brower about the documentary etc are here https://webcache.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuitcourt/Evidence%20Admitted%20January%2021%2C%202026/BB%20Exhibit%2063.pdf |