Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Twitter seems pretty unanimously on H&Ms side.

As it should be. And don’t forget this interview was live in the U.S. and a few of the 80+ countries tonight. Live in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world Monday.

[Anonymous]

Harry and Meghan are like the anti-Felipe and Letizia. People were slating that one at the time, too, saying she wasn't suitable for him, and rumor was that his parents were iffy on it too and only gave in because he threatened to run off. Well, 17 years later and still going swimmingly. Things seem rock solid, at least on the home front. They've had to clean up messes left by Juan Carlos and Cristina, but haven't created any of their own. That one came good in the way this one has gone bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great interview that really delivered. Wonder how the monarchy will modernize seems like a missed opportunity with Meghan

Charles will modernize the Monarchy

Meghan is a common American and has no role in the monarchy.

Except that by being so hamhanded in their treatment of her they will now, and forever look ossified.

[Anonymous]

BRF and British media are racist
MM is a self absorbed, whiney and entitled
Charles sucks
All can be true

MM did not have chance not only bc of the racism, but also bc she does not bring a whole lot to the table. She is very pretty, but mediocre in every other way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter seems pretty unanimously on H&Ms side.

As it should be. And don’t forget this interview was live in the U.S. and a few of the 80+ countries tonight. Live in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world Monday.

No it was not live. People were leaking that she went easy on Kate a day before the interview.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Filthy rich, pregnant and STILL craving this sort of infamy and viral attention = mentally ill.

Agree. I don’t buy it. She’s toxic.

+1.

+2

[Anonymous]

It was not live if they showed clips of it days in advance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LIAR - the BRF may have cut him off financially, but he's independently wealthy. What a piece of shit.

?

He said that they wouldn’t have been able to make it without his inheritance.

They wouldn't have been able to "make it" without a $20million house? ffs.

You all would just love for them to live in a shack.

Because those are the only two options?

In California? Yes. A shack is a million dollars. The Sussexs actually got a deal on their home. It should have cost far more on paper for the location, privacy, renovation and square footage.

LOL

Why don’t you take a look at real estate in Montecito and get back to us. Under $15 million is a deal when your neighbors are paying $30-$90 million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not shedding too many tears for billionaire Meghan, but the BRF is clearly the villain here regardless. Glad she’s attempting to finish what Diana couldn’t. Diana would love her.

When did she become billionaire?

When she married into the BRF. They own the best real estate company n Lindn and the Duke f Cornwall owns hectacres of fertile land and lakes in Cornwall

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Filthy rich, pregnant and STILL craving this sort of infamy and viral attention = mentally ill.

Agree. I don’t buy it. She’s toxic.

+1.

Things just don’t add up with her. I think the BRF is toxic but it always has been, so she offered no news in that regard. So also got exactly what one could expect marrying into that family. I think actually think the BRF went out of their way to accept her at first (likely because she is black and they want to appear modern and open). Doria was invited to Sandringham, Charles walked her down the aisle, the Queen brought her along on some of her engagements. But Meghan obviously will not follow protocol and seemed to be more interested in what’s in this new role for her vs. how can she support the monarchy. She wanted media and attention, just on her own terms.

I find Meghan so off-putting that it’s hard to feel sympathy for her. I believe she’ll twist stories and all out lie to make herself look good. I do feel sorry for Harry. I think he’s not bright enough to realize the damage she has caused to him and his life. While she plays the victim, he truly is one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

And in the context of all the death threats they were getting. WTF? They're cutting security to their own grandson/son/brother, who is getting regular death threats? It's shocking for "the firm" to do that, but it's also family.

The British Royal Family didn’t cut off security. Meghan and Harry left their security behind when they left England. The British government (the Metropolitan Police Department, if memory serves) provides security for the BRF. They could have stayed in England and kept their security. The British taxpayers weren’t going to pay for multiple British police officers to live in the US full time. When Royals travel abroad on official travel, security is usually provided by the local government, but the Canadians and US governments said no thanks to putting the cost on their taxpayers for full time residents.

As for Archie needing his own security, how does an infant need security apart from that provided to his parents? As for the security of Nottingham Cottage, they chose to live there because they didn’t want to live in Kensington Palace. They moved away from the facilities where security could be provided and then whined about not having security. They can have security — they can move back to England.

Umm no - they had protection officers staged in Canada. You don’t reminder when palace courtiers finally found out where they were and suddenly articles about Meghan treating their protection officers as delivery drivers popped up. The palace is nothing if not consistently cruel.

They did have protection officers in the beginning, when it was supposedly just a “vacation,” but the government balked when it became clear the arrangement was permanent. Once they decided they were staying, the police said they couldn’t foot the cost. Can you imagine how outrageously expensive it is to pay for British police department employees to live overseas full time? It shows how dim Harry is if he thought that wasn’t going to be a problem. Then again, it’s pretty clear from their original announcement about leaving that they hadn’t thought any of this through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clay nails it.

White man from the height of his privilege.

Meghan can pass for white and it seems all of her friends and boyfriends were white, attended private schools all her life, born in diverse and progressive Los Angeles. Clay, a GAY white man from the SOUTH is far less privileged than she ever was.

Sounds like you’re white. To black people, her black ancestry is clear. I would’ve placed her as either biracial or just a light skinned black woman.

Be that as it may, if the white people she is predominantly interacting with see and accept her as white/one of them, the fact that black people recognize her as mixed race doesn’t negate her privilege

Your whole argument is faulty. My DH is white, I’m the only Black person in my division at work, most of my friends are white and they accept me as one of their own. So excited that I’m white now too!

Yes, if you are as fair skinned as Megan and straighten your hair then for all intents and purposes your friends/American society writ large probably will view and treat you as white. Not sure why that’s surprising.

You are truly hopeless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

And in the context of all the death threats they were getting. WTF? They're cutting security to their own grandson/son/brother, who is getting regular death threats? It's shocking for "the firm" to do that, but it's also family.

The British Royal Family didn’t cut off security. Meghan and Harry left their security behind when they left England. The British government (the Metropolitan Police Department, if memory serves) provides security for the BRF. They could have stayed in England and kept their security. The British taxpayers weren’t going to pay for multiple British police officers to live in the US full time. When Royals travel abroad on official travel, security is usually provided by the local government, but the Canadians and US governments said no thanks to putting the cost on their taxpayers for full time residents.

As for Archie needing his own security, how does an infant need security apart from that provided to his parents? As for the security of Nottingham Cottage, they chose to live there because they didn’t want to live in Kensington Palace. They moved away from the facilities where security could be provided and then whined about not having security. They can have security — they can move back to England.

Meghan said in England only Harry had security. Meghan and the BABY need security because they are targets for terrorists and psycho stalkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan can pass for white, so her children with such a fair-skinned man are going to be white. The "concern" about them "coming out black" is 100% fake. Race-hustling liar.

She cannot pass for white and genetics are weird. Melanin isn’t like ink in water; there can be kids who look like a deeper colored ancestor or grandparent.

How did the Haitians know who to kill during their Revolution?

Their kids are like all of <10% black. They are going to look white and probably have good hair. But I'm sure Meghan will pimp them and make them look more ethnic than they actually are.

Well, it’s complicated because there are many white people, who I’m told, don’t see color.

In reality most white people see white and black and Megan, and certainly Archie, fall in the white category.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter seems pretty unanimously on H&Ms side.

As it should be. And don’t forget this interview was live in the U.S. and a few of the 80+ countries tonight. Live in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world Monday.

No it was not live. People were leaking that she went easy on Kate a day before the interview.

Apologies - ‘pre-taped and released in the US then’. Better?