Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.

You think JM made all that up? You think JM knew exactly words and timing of when messages were sent by “Christine” if JM wasn’t the one writing them? No.

Calm down. I’m not defending her.
I’m saying that the defense attorney keeps saying that it wasn’t catfish. Even if it wasn’t, they still killed CB and JR so it doesn’t matter.

What evidence do you have that they killed CB?

I don’t have any. That’s with the CW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a couple hours behind but watching the audio of Brendan going to hospital. Doctor says "your wife has died."

I assume bluntness by the doctor is the right approach so people can process and understand the news. In a general situation however is it normal for the doctor/officer to stick to their roles and be fairly silent while someone processes the loss of their spouse or do you think they were treading carefully here because it was a crime scene?

I was about to ask that!!! Can someone answer this ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.

You think JM made all that up? You think JM knew exactly words and timing of when messages were sent by “Christine” if JM wasn’t the one writing them? No.

Calm down. I’m not defending her.
I’m saying that the defense attorney keeps saying that it wasn’t catfish. Even if it wasn’t, they still killed CB and JR so it doesn’t matter.

What evidence do you have that they killed CB?

I don’t have any. That’s with the CW.

I believe BB is guilty as hell, but in my opinion, CW has not done a good job of establishing She was stabbed by Brendan. I hope they can really pull it together in the closing statements for the jury but I’m worried this guy is gonna go free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.

You think JM made all that up? You think JM knew exactly words and timing of when messages were sent by “Christine” if JM wasn’t the one writing them? No.

Calm down. I’m not defending her.
I’m saying that the defense attorney keeps saying that it wasn’t catfish. Even if it wasn’t, they still killed CB and JR so it doesn’t matter.

What evidence do you have that they killed CB?

I don’t have any. That’s with the CW.

I believe BB is guilty as hell, but in my opinion, CW has not done a good job of establishing She was stabbed by Brendan. I hope they can really pull it together in the closing statements for the jury but I’m worried this guy is gonna go free.

What specifically are you looking for, forensic evidence (something about angle of knife wounds or blood etc)? There is a lot of eyewitness testimony that he is the one who stabbed her, and further, that he had been planning to stab her for months.

There are only really 3 possibilities: she was stabbed by Joe; she was stabbed by Brendan; she was stabbed by Juliana.

Most of this will come down to how credible a witness Juliana was. But even if you wanted to discount her testimony as biased or made up, I think there will be significant facts referred to in closing argument by the CW about how Joe was NOT the one who stabbed Christine. The jury is allowed to make inferences and draw on circumstantial evidence.

Not predicting anything as to this particular jury, however!!

[Anonymous]

Anyone watching the trial?
Is his attorney trying to incriminate him w those body cam videos?

[Anonymous]

Every trial should be required to have a kid from the local high school AV club to do the tech for both sides.

[Anonymous]

The Defense lawyer is a joke. Birds of a feather.

[Anonymous]

Any mom would know you can infact hold liquids in your hands. For example when your child vomits and you offer your hands as a bowl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any mom would know you can infact hold liquids in your hands. For example when your child vomits and you offer your hands as a bowl.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

She died of blood loss? Doctor said her airway was fine. So the 911 hang up was a deadly delay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She died of blood loss? Doctor said her airway was fine. So the 911 hang up was a deadly delay?

I'm afraid it's worse than you say. Based on JM's statements the BB attacked CB after the 911 hang up.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if CB figures out JM and BB were together in this at the time of her death.

[Anonymous]

There’s just so many unanswered questions. No testimony about the state of the marriage. No testimony about her work habits and schedule like when she last worked, how tiring that would be - anything to establish that she isn’t likely to do something like this. Nothing to show that she did or didn’t use her laptop in the evening normally. No one asked Julian why she would go along with something like this? The whole thing feels so incomplete thus far. I can see jurors saying “I think he did it but they didn’t prove it.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every trial should be required to have a kid from the local high school AV club to do the tech for both sides.

Real

I did not start following this case early on. I just watched the bodycam footage of the police arriving and meeting Julianna, with blood all over her hands, and they are just letting her run those hands through her hair, touch her clothing, getting her water and then putting her in a car with the child WTF? This seems like a massive fail.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand why the defense is playing these body cam recordings without injecting with any questions that tell the story.