Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Great interview that really delivered. Wonder how the monarchy will modernize seems like a missed opportunity with Meghan

[Anonymous]

The same damn white lady keeps posting anti Sussex propaganda. Get out here with your nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d get the hell out of that family too.
Look at Charles’s siblings - so many of them are useless f#ckups, don’t have jobs, have to beg Charles for money, don’t have their own voices, etc. They are trapped in the palace walls and can’t live elsewhere.

Why do you think Fergie and Andrew still live together? They have nowhere else to go or any money to survive.

Harry has set the template for Charlotte and Louis to chart their own course once George has a family.

Aside from a divorce, Anne's life seems pretty solid. Edward's had some stumbles but seems to have a fine life now.


Andrew and Fergie are a mess because Andrew and Fergie are messes

Disagree. Edward has all the trappings of someone being permanently trapped in the closet. Right down to the questionable “roommate” in his youth. Anne seems content with her lot in life but is a future hoarder. Saw some thing that showed her living room. So much clutter.

Yep his wife Sophie was forced to do an interview in the 90s denying he’s gay. He’s gay.

And Anne - most people don’t even realize she’s still married. Her ‘husband’ is not a part of her life - personally or professionally. The only reason they aren’t divorced is that it would look bad for the Princess Royal to be a twice divorcee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Diana died from injuries from a car crash because she wasn’t wearing her seatbelt.

[Anonymous]

Oprah called them on some of their nonsense.

I could tell she didn’t buy some of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Because she chose to climb into a car driven by a drunk driver without wearing her seatbelt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Because she chose to climb into a car driven by a drunk driver without wearing her seatbelt.

The only survivor...wore his seatbelt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one here who thinks she needs to be blaming HARRY just a little bit for not helping her? I mean, is he so stupid that he didn't know ahead of time that she'd need help with royal protocols, couldn't he have double downed on her requests for mental health help (and also really who just EMAILS about that stuff??)?

My husband made the point just now that I guided him on how to behave around my foreign family in a foreign country. I told him he needed to, like, take his shoes off at the temple, what to do when we visited my grandparents in their small village, warned him about the squatty potty, LOL. Where was Harry in all this???

I think so. Although it seems like nothing happens without dear Grandma's approval.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Would the protection officers have made her wear her seat belt? Lord, the obsession with victimhood on this thread.

ita!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absolutely loved that they had their say. I found them totally believable.

+1

I basically think that if you went into this hating them and thinking she's a narcissistic opportunist, you'll come out thinking the same thing. If you went into this thinking the BRF is a bunch of racist classist a-holes, you'll come out thinking the same thing. This didn't change anyone's mind about anyone.

Personally, I think both things are true.

Me too. I posted (about fifty pages back) that I don’t really like Meghan; there is something about her that I do not trust. I think part of it is her actor-ish affectations (I haven’t liked the few actors I have known), but also: that’s a really fcked up institution. I don’t get the point of the interview, but I enjoyed watching it.

[Anonymous]

So, I think Meghan is a phony lying narcissist BUT after this interview, the person who I think looks worse for the wear here is Charles. Not talking calls from Harry is bad.

[Anonymous]

Do you think it's a coincidence that suddenly Kensington Royal IG has black people in IG and 1st post. I mean I'm sure they occasionally have a black person, but it seems like they are trying to see "Racist...I'm not racist...here's a black person!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought they did well. My guess is a Kate is a bitch and Willy is a pompous jerk, but they went easy on her because Harry doesn't want to burn bridges. He's pissed at papa though.

Meghan is bright and well spoken...other than her constantly saying "right?" Who oh why didn't they ask her about her crazy sister bashing her?

She’s much brighter and more manipulative than Harry. Her dysfunction and histrionic personality disorder probably harkens back to his mother. She’s definitely steering this ship.

They are a study of children raised by emotionally immature and dysfunctional parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LIAR - the BRF may have cut him off financially, but he's independently wealthy. What a piece of shit.

?

He said that they wouldn’t have been able to make it without his inheritance.

They wouldn't have been able to "make it" without a $20million house? ffs.

You all would just love for them to live in a shack.

Because those are the only two options?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Would the protection officers have made her wear her seat belt? Lord, the obsession with victimhood on this thread.

I doubt that the driver would have been drunk and on drugs. So that certainly would have been an improvement.