Russians Compromising Trump

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


I'm so embarrassed for our country.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:RIP CNN
6-1-1980 to 1/11/17
"You truly gave Josef Goebbels a run for his money"



Tell us what specifically was false in their story yesterday. Specific sentences that are false please.


Are you stupid or something. They picked up on a BizzFeed story - without verifying anything, and disseminated bad info.

Read the tread clown, it's in there.


Just so that we're talking about the same thing, the CNN story was about the 2 page synopsis. The classified one. Buzzfeed posted the full memo after the CNN story broke.

This is CNN's story:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/


Exactly this. The classified 2-page summary document covered the details that could be verified. Not everything in the 35 page report is true because it's a composite from interviews with various sources. It was given to the intel agencies so they had a starting point to track down the facts and individuals.

Can't wait for the FISA stuff to be exposed.

This. Who were the four advisors they wanted warrants for? What for? There is ZERO reason to install someone who literally ought to be sitting in a federal penitentiary, someone who is legitimately mad, and someone who doesn't think any rule, tradition or law applies. My god.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:RIP CNN
6-1-1980 to 1/11/17
"You truly gave Josef Goebbels a run for his money"



Tell us what specifically was false in their story yesterday. Specific sentences that are false please.


Are you stupid or something. They picked up on a BizzFeed story - without verifying anything, and disseminated bad info.

Read the tread clown, it's in there.


Just so that we're talking about the same thing, the CNN story was about the 2 page synopsis. The classified one. Buzzfeed posted the full memo after the CNN story broke.

This is CNN's story:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/


Exactly this. The classified 2-page summary document covered the details that could be verified. Not everything in the 35 page report is true because it's a composite from interviews with various sources. It was given to the intel agencies so they had a starting point to track down the facts and individuals.

Can't wait for the FISA stuff to be exposed.

This. Who were the four advisors they wanted warrants for? What for? There is ZERO reason to install someone who literally ought to be sitting in a federal penitentiary, someone who is legitimately mad, and someone who doesn't think any rule, tradition or law applies. My god.


My guess:

Paul Manafort (we now know why he ghosted and has been on radio silence)
Carter Page (same)
Michael Cohen
Michael Flynn
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:RIP CNN
6-1-1980 to 1/11/17
"You truly gave Josef Goebbels a run for his money"



Tell us what specifically was false in their story yesterday. Specific sentences that are false please.


Are you stupid or something. They picked up on a BizzFeed story - without verifying anything, and disseminated bad info.

Read the tread clown, it's in there.


Just so that we're talking about the same thing, the CNN story was about the 2 page synopsis. The classified one. Buzzfeed posted the full memo after the CNN story broke.

This is CNN's story:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/


Exactly this. The classified 2-page summary document covered the details that could be verified. Not everything in the 35 page report is true because it's a composite from interviews with various sources. It was given to the intel agencies so they had a starting point to track down the facts and individuals.

Can't wait for the FISA stuff to be exposed.


Byline includes Jake Tapper and Carl Bernstein.
Anonymous
At one point, his corrupt ass will be served. It will be sooner rather than later.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Buzzfeed’s Trump report takes ‘fake news’ to a new level
By John Podhoretz January 10, 2017 | 10:56pm | Updated


"So the website BuzzFeed decided to publish a series of memos that have been floating around for months alleging all kinds of terrible things about Donald Trump.

Some of those terrible allegations have to do with efforts to influence the American elections and Trump. Some of them have to do with Trump’s personal sexual conduct.

Readers of this newspaper know well not to include me among Trump’s supporters. But the scurrilousness of what BuzzFeed has done here is so beyond the bounds of what is even remotely acceptable it should compel even those most outraged by Trump’s political excesses to come to his defense and to the defense of a few other people mentioned in these papers whose names are also dragged through the mud.

There is literally no evidence on offer in these memos or from BuzzFeed that any single sentence in these documents is factual or true. What’s more, we know most major news organizations in America had seen them and despite their well-known institutional antipathy toward Trump, had chosen not to publish them or even make reference to them after efforts to substantiate their charges had failed."


I'll pass on Podhoretz and the NY Post.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Ha! Yes Conservatives were WRONG on the Clintons for years and not measured at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Ha! Yes Conservatives were WRONG on the Clintons for years and not measured at all.


Yep. It was all a right wing conspiracy................until it wasn’t.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Is that before or after you bring guns into pizza shops?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Ha! Yes Conservatives were WRONG on the Clintons for years and not measured at all.


Nope. We are not
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Ha! Yes Conservatives were WRONG on the Clintons for years and not measured at all.


Yep. It was all a right wing conspiracy................until it wasn’t.


Vince Foster? Whitewater? What came if these? Nothing. They were not guilty of any thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:After reading the new threads the past two days, I can predict it will be a long, long, terribly long 4 years for some of the liberals here.
Should be fun to watch.


Bitch, please. It took you apologists a couple of hours to pick your jaws up off the floor and get back to trolling after the news broke yesterday. It was so blessedly peaceful. I look forward to more peaceful interludes over the next four years, because this is probably the tip of the iceberg.


Conservatives are measured in their response. We wait, watch, research and check plausiblility.


Is that before or after you bring guns into pizza shops?


Ask the guy who did it. At least his goal was to rescue kids.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: