Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There he goes talking about Mamaw.

Born in 1984 to a drug addict. He’s a crack baby. But he has done well. Trump is going to be mad that he’s agreeing with Waltz so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I think Vence is even better looking than Obama was when he was young.

If you all are doing some weird bit trying to make Republicans look weird with this, it’s working.

Yeah the creepy incel trolls boosting Vance on this thread are only making Republicans sound fake and desperate. It's not very believable and over the top!

Welcome DCUM, Cougar Town

[Anonymous]

I'm voting for Harris for sure. According to Vance, she already controls everything! She is an omnipotent Boss!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

ummmmmm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance will bs throughout.
Walk will be talking plain language making connections to middle class and he will provably be laughing at the ridiculous things that'll come out of Vance.

Seems like the opposite is happening.
Vance is very smooth.
Waltz is nervous and stumbling.

I agree

The stammering is very concerning. Even with help from his ear piece.

Vance is smarmy. Walz "stammering". Is his natural speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.

+1
Vance is very smooth. He would make a good FH Furr HVAC salesperson. He'll rob you blind.

Walz comes across as down to earth but also nervous and less prepared. But maybe that's a good thing since Harris was allegedly "over prepared"? Or is that only a bad thing for women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This debate isn’t changing my vote, but I gotta admit both VP candidates are presenting better than their respective running mates.

I don’t think so. Just because Kamala blew someone like Trump out of the water doesn’t mean she should be graded on a curve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.

Yes, I agree.

THANKFULLY, no VP debate has ever moved the needle.

This one is going to move the needle. There is a high chance that Trump may not make it through 4 grueling years. Vance is coming across as presidential.

What have you been drinking?

[Anonymous]

Vance: "Immigrants are filling up housing"

But all those babies you want won't?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance is winning this debate. Walz, by his own admission, is not a strong debator. Vance is coming off as cool and knowledgeable, Walz seems anxious and uncertain.

Vance is still evil.

Yes, I agree.

THANKFULLY, no VP debate has ever moved the needle.

Except this one. Walz failing desperately. He was supposed to be a better speaker than Kamala. I am wondering if he spent too much time with her recently and it is affecting his ability to speak in public like he used to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow vance just called walz out on abortion wow. Hes voted for no health for a baby born after a botched abortion.

Nope. The Minnesota law Walz signed requires that doctors provide care to babies born alive after an abortion.

It does not require doctors to resuscitate a baby. The decision about whether to resuscitate any person who is dying is something that doctors should decide along with families. To require resuscitation is to demand that some babies needlessly suffer. These are often babies that have conditions that are incompatible with life. Do you know what resuscitation involves or what it feels like?

A baby born alive after an abortion? Sounds barbaric and inhumane. We keep hearing it's just a clump of cells. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This debate isn’t changing my vote, but I gotta admit both VP candidates are presenting better than their respective running mates.

I don’t think so. Just because Kamala blew someone like Trump out of the water doesn’t mean she should be graded on a curve.

"Grading on a curve" is literally how elections work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where are all these illegal aliens buying houses

Californian.

Lots of news about migrants buying houses and having 2-3 families living in them.

Google it.

[Anonymous]

The worst person in the debate is Norah

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocked at how well vance is doing!!!

He is so much better than Trump, I wish he ran for president. We need someone young, handsome, educated, like Kennedy.

Let me guess, you love reality TV. You are looking to cast a president rather than elect one. Anyway, Vance's fat face isn't attractive to me.

Vance is fat? By what standards?

His fat is doughy and lacking bone structure.