Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was such a beautiful photo of them. The edits were probably minor but given the scrutiny it would receive, they should have left any imperfections alone. I doubt there were serious breaches like photoshopping or splicing a whole person in. I also think they should have been more specific on when it was taken since questions about that were predictable.

What? NO, they were not minor! Do you think the AP would pull a photo and put out a release that it was manipulated by the future king of England if it was a minor edit?? Come on!

Minor in comparison to dropping in a whole new person. Cleaning up a hand position, background or whatever I personally consider minor. A lot of people have done that but are not people who would be evaluated by the AP. They should have known better, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW! So nuts!

This feels like trolls won. Only internet sleuths cared about the positions of their fingers. If this were that important why didn't these esteemed media sites review them before publication?

Good point.

[Anonymous]

I would tell them to fire me and blame me for the photo manipulation and my replacement should be an American PR firm.

But before I leave have me release a statement to the public that says “I manipulated the pic, with William’s approval, and released the Mother’s Day message along with the doctored pic on his behalf!!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What would you recommend if you were part of their PR group right by now?

Depends on what is actually going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW! So nuts!

This feels like trolls won. Only internet sleuths cared about the positions of their fingers. If this were that important why didn't these esteemed media sites review them before publication?

lol this can't be a real comment. 1. The RF was already aware of the conspiracies surrounding Kate. 2. They publicly posted a manipulated photo that was so bad agencies had to pull it for their own credibility. They did nothing wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would tell them to fire me and blame me for the photo manipulation and my replacement should be an American PR firm.

But before I leave have me release a statement to the public that says “I manipulated the pic, with William’s approval, and released the Mother’s Day message along with the doctored pic on his behalf!!”

😂😂 love it!! If I am going down, they're going with me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I didn’t have William posting doctored pic of his wife and kids, on Mothers’ Day, on my bingo card! The future king of England…unf***believable!

Why are people picking apart a photo of woman (who is recovering from major surgery) and her children… on Mother’s Day? What is wrong with you??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW! So nuts!

This feels like trolls won. Only internet sleuths cared about the positions of their fingers. If this were that important why didn't these esteemed media sites review them before publication?

Nobody would notice or care if she wasn’t “missing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will they try to blame Harry and Meghan for this mess?!

You know the answer to this!

If I’m Kensington palace PR team though, I’m working on a statement that says Harry and Meaghan altered the photo after hacking into William’s laptop. 💀

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would tell them to fire me and blame me for the photo manipulation and my replacement should be an American PR firm.

But before I leave have me release a statement to the public that says “I manipulated the pic, with William’s approval, and released the Mother’s Day message along with the doctored pic on his behalf!!”

Note: I want the BRF to go up in flames so I am for any action that will hasten its demise!

[Anonymous]

It’s not just finger placement. The line under her neck (connected to the off-center zipper section) makes it seem as though her head is photoshopped in.

[Anonymous]

99% of photos are edited. Not a big deal at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WOW! So nuts!

This feels like trolls won. Only internet sleuths cared about the positions of their fingers. If this were that important why didn't these esteemed media sites review them before publication?

Nobody would notice or care if she wasn’t “missing.”

That's what makes it so bizarre! Why would they do this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn’t have William posting doctored pic of his wife and kids, on Mothers’ Day, on my bingo card! The future king of England…unf***believable!

Why are people picking apart a photo of woman (who is recovering from major surgery) and her children… on Mother’s Day? What is wrong with you??

Your annoyance is misplaced! I’m not the one who tried to mislead the public by posting manipulated pics of my family!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:99% of photos are edited. Not a big deal at all.

They why aren't 99% of photos pulled by the AP?