| Harvard takes a good- sized group from Boston Public Schools. Perhaps others have similar agreements with their local systems. |
You typed a lot more after that, but there was no reason to read it as you admitted PP was right in your third sentence. |
You missed the OP's point-- unhooked is the key term. How many of the 76% are legacies, athletes, development cases, rural, first Gen, etc.? |
| Go to the school yourself. Then Have multiple kids and keep practicing adjusting and navigating until you get it right. |
Nope. “White and Asian” is not the same as “unhooked white and Asian.” Is it your belief that none of the legacies admitted to Harvard are white or Asian? How about athletes? First Gen? Faculty children? Rural? |
Agree, I’ve seen this repeatedly too. |
| Come from a top boarding school |
An interesting question is how much of this is the legacy effect? According to this, about 40% of Harvard’s entering class is from the NE, but almost 40% of those students are legacies. https://features.thecrimson.com/2017/freshman-survey/makeup-narrative/ |
What an astronomically stupid comment, on multiple fronts. |
I think you need to read the OPs statement again, learn the meaning of "largest", and admit that your argument is faulty because your points carry gigantic assumptions. For example "Even allowing for some overlap between hooks (First gen/recruited athlete? Legacy/Director's List? Rural/first gen?)" when in fact you don't know what percentage of those hooks are what race. You use them all as exclusions. You don't have the facts or data to support your assumptions. The most you can say is that PP does not know the percentage of "unhooked" and should remove that from his statement, which would weaken it. But your admission that "For the class of 2021, 75.9% are white or Asian." throws your claim out wholesale. Sorry. |
If you read DCUM, everyone recommends to cast a wide net. What is stupid is applying only to HYP. Apply to HYP - but also apply to Cornell, Vandy, Northwestern, BU - and throw in safety state universities. |
BU and BC are not at the level of the aforementioned universities. |
| My unhooked MCPS kid is at an ivy. No idea why she was interesting to them other than great grades and scores. Ran track for 4 years but just to stay in shape. No real talent. Minor leadership. I did not even think her essay was that great. Just apply and see what happens. |
|
Anonymous wrote:
a)recruited athlete plus good grades/scores b) URM plus good grades/scoresc c) legacy plus good grades/scores OR d) close to perfect grades/scores and something else remarkable. If you're not a, b or c you need a stellar academic record plus something else that sets you apart from the crowd. Something that makes you remarkable. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What are examples of "something else remarkable"? Real ones... |
MO, no, and no to the original PP. Receuited athletes and URMs can have stats as high as UMBC students. |