+1 Yup. Unless you are URM, forget it OP. Since you asked. |
It's definitely the wealth in some cases. You see this play out at the "Big3" (top) DC privates. 10 kids apply to Princeton or Yale or wherever. The one that gets in has a parent who makes $15 million/year despite having mediocre or no extracurriculars and inferior grades. I have seen this play out SO many times at my kids' school. |
So what do you say to parents of unhooked kids who are admitted? How do you prove that claim in the face of contrary evidence? |
| Six kids in my DD’s class went Ivy - 3 URM, 1 Valedictorian, 1 nationally accomplished at activity, 1 ED to Cornell & “normal” |
| Be an URM from a red state. |
Try to take a more positive view of this. Maybe the girl going to Malawi every summer to build school huts has very wealthy parents that are actually doing a wonderful thing - teaching their child to give back to others and to see a different perspective on the world. |
Yeah because there are no white kids at ivies.
|
| Apply to lower level ivies like Cornell. That’s like WashU, Vandy, Rice, Northwestern, Boston University, Boston College... - except it’s an Ivy. |
If that was the goal, they would have set it up in their names (not the 5th grader's name) and had her participate anyway. They were dumb thought, they should have waited until around 9th grade when someone might actually think it was the kid's idea. |
| From what I have seen, legacy+cash or URM is the only way to go to HYPS. Cornell and Dartmouth don't seem to care as much about the URM representation. |
Then you haven’t seen much. Unhooked white and Asian kids still make up the largest portion of every HYPS class. |
+1. Based upon the number of times some version of this response appears in this thread, it is clear that being a decent person is NOT a requirement. |
but, outside of a very few feeder schools, most will be valedictorians who bring something else to the table, recruited athletes, or development projects. I don't think Harvard has many class filler admits |
"Unhooked white and Asian kids?" Probably not. In fact, it's pretty much statistically impossible. For the class of 2021, 75.9% are white or Asian. But overall, 16% of the class are first generation, 8.7% are from rural areas, 17% are legacies. In past years, 20% were recruited athletes, and another 10% are walk on "soft" recruits, 10% are "Director's List" (big donors), and 1% are faculty children. Those categories add up to 82.7%. First Gen and Legacies are obviously mutually exclusive, and together those two are 33%. Even if you only allow for those two and assume the categories of hooks are evenly distributed amongst the races, you're down to 42.9% unhooked white & Asian kids (this is probably generous, based on the race of alumni historically, I have a suspicion that the legacy population is probably disproportionately white, but I don't care enough to look it up). That's before you get to the other 41% of "hooks." In fact, the percentages of hooks (not even counting for race) adds up to 82.7%. The total non-white, non-Asian population admitted is 24.1%. Even allowing for some overlap between hooks (First gen/recruited athlete? Legacy/Director's List? Rural/first gen?), there's a minimal number of slots left for the "unhooked white and Asian" kid. There are obviously some. But no way is it the "largest portion." https://features.thecrimson.com/2017/freshman-survey/makeup-narrative/ https://veritasessays.org/college-admissions-blog/posts/types-of-students-admitted-to-harvard-requirements |
There is also d) faculty child plus good grades/scores |