Andy Ngo, notorious racial agitator, caught in Portland protest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry, link here.

Wait. Who is trying to destroy democracy? You RWNJs have been breathing too many orange fumes and have brain damage. I seem to recall Putin's militia group trying to overthrow the US government recently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

In the opinion of a typical ignorant leftist. Full stop.

This. It's amazing how much they hate him. He's nothing like Project Veritas. He posts unedited clips of people rioting in public places. That's it. That's his big crime.

He always just happens to be in whatever city there is some protest that he is capturing. It's all coincidence.




https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-02-08/andy-ngo-new-book-still-pretends-antifa-real-enemy

He never claimed to show up at a protest by coincidence.

Reminds me of the story of a bunch of fires in a small town and one man always being found in the crowd when it happened. Turns out the little fire watcher was actually the arsonist.

+1
He’s a useless little sht provocateur. He has definitely edited some of little videos and misrepresented others. Slimy republicans think he’s a good person, but they have lost their ability to perceive who is a good person.

He is... and no matter who's involved, he always claims they are "Antifa" even if the protest has absolutely nothing to do with Antifa. He isn't reporting, he's peddling a narrative to fearmonger and stir conservatives up. If someone in rural America were to listen to nobody but Andy Ngo they'd think half of American cities had been burned to the ground, that police are doing nothing and that the country is on the brink of being taken over when that's not even remotely the case. Most of the Portland protests have been confined to like a 2 block area, most of Portland is doing just fine. Andy will show 15 different angles of a piece of the same building that was vandalized or burned and make you think it is 15 different buildings and multiple events spanning a single date when it was just one incident. He'll show a piece of burning cardboard that was put out within minutes but try to make it sound like an entire neighborhood got burned down. It's all spin and narrative.

Yep, typical propaganda from drumps followers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

+2
And note - he wasn’t setting anything on fire or destroying government buildings and businesses. He was there to document those who do. Good for him.

No. -2. How do we know he wasn't there to cause trouble? People infiltrating protest groups to cause trouble happens quite a bit more than people realize, for example the Boogaloo Bois who have repeatedly been caught for arson, vandalism, violence, molotov cocktails, ambush attacks on police officers and attacks on police departments under the guise of "BLM/Antifa" - with notorious examples being the "Umbrella Man" in Minneapolis but also arrests in a half dozen other cities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbrella-man-associated-white-supremacist-group-george-floyd/index.html

Also, Andy Ngo has previously been exposed for having rather cozy relationships with Proud Boys and other violent far right extremists and domestic terrorist (whom he does NOT do "investigative journalism" against) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

+1
He is 100% there to cause trouble and create a narrative, like the PP who said if rural people only listened to his drivel they’d think cities had burned to the ground. He’s an agent provocateur. He doesn’t “expose truth,” he’s committing crimes.

Andy Ngo has been caught on camera conspiring and joking around with Proud Boys and other violent extremist groups as they planned their own violence in Portland. Yet he didn't report on any of those interactions... because he's part of it.

But aren’t those groups completely racist and would never accept an Asian into their fold?

Are you kidding? The Proud Boys would use anyone as a means to an end. They had a Latino national leader who got kicked out in 2020 because he no longer ‘represented’ the face they wanted to portray. I’m sure he was shocked at the betrayal…

https://www.insider.com/ousted-proud-boys-underling-attempts-white-supremacist-coup-2020-11

I was waiting for this response. So predictable. I know, Antifa are the good guys. Why they only want change!

Couple of classic con mistakes in your post coming from your deep well of ignorance.

First, Democrats don’t support “antifa” (although we should be anti-fascist. It’s really only Republicans who embrace fascism) and antifa sure as shet doesn’t support the Democrats. If you’d ever personally known any actual far left people, you’d understand their derision for Democrats.

Second, “antifa” isn’t really a thing in the same way that right wing terrorists are. They’re not well coordinated. They’re not a monolith. And they don’t have big numbers. They also don’t have support from within any political party, whereas Andy Ngo and the Proud Boys, Boogaloo Bois, all sorts of domestic terrorists are coddled and supported by Republicans.

They don’t want change. They want to blow up the system.



Do you ever get tired of believing you know anything? Do you never get frustrated that your media choices are keeping you stupid?

Antifa is not a thing. The left created this false boogeyman to try to unite the crazies against anyone who criticized he or his goons. Drumpsters used the term to try to normalize fascism. The Portland problem is caused by anarchists. We now have them on both sides of the left/right spectrum. All of this is artifically created mayhem orchestrated by outside forces. We are being manipulated by governments outside of our own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

+2
And note - he wasn’t setting anything on fire or destroying government buildings and businesses. He was there to document those who do. Good for him.

No. -2. How do we know he wasn't there to cause trouble? People infiltrating protest groups to cause trouble happens quite a bit more than people realize, for example the Boogaloo Bois who have repeatedly been caught for arson, vandalism, violence, molotov cocktails, ambush attacks on police officers and attacks on police departments under the guise of "BLM/Antifa" - with notorious examples being the "Umbrella Man" in Minneapolis but also arrests in a half dozen other cities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbrella-man-associated-white-supremacist-group-george-floyd/index.html

Also, Andy Ngo has previously been exposed for having rather cozy relationships with Proud Boys and other violent far right extremists and domestic terrorist (whom he does NOT do "investigative journalism" against) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

+1
He is 100% there to cause trouble and create a narrative, like the PP who said if rural people only listened to his drivel they’d think cities had burned to the ground. He’s an agent provocateur. He doesn’t “expose truth,” he’s committing crimes.

Andy Ngo has been caught on camera conspiring and joking around with Proud Boys and other violent extremist groups as they planned their own violence in Portland. Yet he didn't report on any of those interactions... because he's part of it.

But aren’t those groups completely racist and would never accept an Asian into their fold?

Are you kidding? The Proud Boys would use anyone as a means to an end. They had a Latino national leader who got kicked out in 2020 because he no longer ‘represented’ the face they wanted to portray. I’m sure he was shocked at the betrayal…

https://www.insider.com/ousted-proud-boys-underling-attempts-white-supremacist-coup-2020-11

I was waiting for this response. So predictable. I know, Antifa are the good guys. Why they only want change!

Couple of classic con mistakes in your post coming from your deep well of ignorance.

First, Democrats don’t support “antifa” (although we should be anti-fascist. It’s really only Republicans who embrace fascism) and antifa sure as shet doesn’t support the Democrats. If you’d ever personally known any actual far left people, you’d understand their derision for Democrats.

Second, “antifa” isn’t really a thing in the same way that right wing terrorists are. They’re not well coordinated. They’re not a monolith. And they don’t have big numbers. They also don’t have support from within any political party, whereas Andy Ngo and the Proud Boys, Boogaloo Bois, all sorts of domestic terrorists are coddled and supported by Republicans.

They don’t want change. They want to blow up the system.



Do you ever get tired of believing you know anything? Do you never get frustrated that your media choices are keeping you stupid?

Ever notice how the left self-righteously rants against things you didn't say, totally ignores what you did say, then calls you names based on their own misconceptions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

+2
And note - he wasn’t setting anything on fire or destroying government buildings and businesses. He was there to document those who do. Good for him.

No. -2. How do we know he wasn't there to cause trouble? People infiltrating protest groups to cause trouble happens quite a bit more than people realize, for example the Boogaloo Bois who have repeatedly been caught for arson, vandalism, violence, molotov cocktails, ambush attacks on police officers and attacks on police departments under the guise of "BLM/Antifa" - with notorious examples being the "Umbrella Man" in Minneapolis but also arrests in a half dozen other cities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbrella-man-associated-white-supremacist-group-george-floyd/index.html

Also, Andy Ngo has previously been exposed for having rather cozy relationships with Proud Boys and other violent far right extremists and domestic terrorist (whom he does NOT do "investigative journalism" against) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

+1
He is 100% there to cause trouble and create a narrative, like the PP who said if rural people only listened to his drivel they’d think cities had burned to the ground. He’s an agent provocateur. He doesn’t “expose truth,” he’s committing crimes.

Andy Ngo has been caught on camera conspiring and joking around with Proud Boys and other violent extremist groups as they planned their own violence in Portland. Yet he didn't report on any of those interactions... because he's part of it.

But aren’t those groups completely racist and would never accept an Asian into their fold?

Are you kidding? The Proud Boys would use anyone as a means to an end. They had a Latino national leader who got kicked out in 2020 because he no longer ‘represented’ the face they wanted to portray. I’m sure he was shocked at the betrayal…

https://www.insider.com/ousted-proud-boys-underling-attempts-white-supremacist-coup-2020-11

I was waiting for this response. So predictable. I know, Antifa are the good guys. Why they only want change!

Couple of classic con mistakes in your post coming from your deep well of ignorance.

First, Democrats don’t support “antifa” (although we should be anti-fascist. It’s really only Republicans who embrace fascism) and antifa sure as shet doesn’t support the Democrats. If you’d ever personally known any actual far left people, you’d understand their derision for Democrats.

Second, “antifa” isn’t really a thing in the same way that right wing terrorists are. They’re not well coordinated. They’re not a monolith. And they don’t have big numbers. They also don’t have support from within any political party, whereas Andy Ngo and the Proud Boys, Boogaloo Bois, all sorts of domestic terrorists are coddled and supported by Republicans.

They don’t want change. They want to blow up the system.



Do you ever get tired of believing you know anything? Do you never get frustrated that your media choices are keeping you stupid?

Antifa is not a thing. The left created this false boogeyman to try to unite the crazies against anyone who criticized he or his goons. Drumpsters used the term to try to normalize fascism. The Portland problem is caused by anarchists. We now have them on both sides of the left/right spectrum. All of this is artifically created mayhem orchestrated by outside forces. We are being manipulated by governments outside of our own.

This actually makes a lot of sense. One of the countries I lived in had "professional" anarchists who would come out during orderly public protests and throw Molotov cocktails, burn cars, and smash store windows. They did this regardless of which party was in power at the time--the left or the right. They didn't GAF and just wanted to create chaos. They weren't carrying signs or espousing specific policies. It was more a way of life than an ideology and they were usually disaffected young men.

The only thing I'm not sure about is who is "orchestrating" this in the US. I mean, it's possible, but have you seen any solid evidence? Sadly, it wouldn't take much at this point to have all sides (left, right, and everyone else) go at each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

+2
And note - he wasn’t setting anything on fire or destroying government buildings and businesses. He was there to document those who do. Good for him.

No. -2. How do we know he wasn't there to cause trouble? People infiltrating protest groups to cause trouble happens quite a bit more than people realize, for example the Boogaloo Bois who have repeatedly been caught for arson, vandalism, violence, molotov cocktails, ambush attacks on police officers and attacks on police departments under the guise of "BLM/Antifa" - with notorious examples being the "Umbrella Man" in Minneapolis but also arrests in a half dozen other cities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbrella-man-associated-white-supremacist-group-george-floyd/index.html

Also, Andy Ngo has previously been exposed for having rather cozy relationships with Proud Boys and other violent far right extremists and domestic terrorist (whom he does NOT do "investigative journalism" against) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

+1
He is 100% there to cause trouble and create a narrative, like the PP who said if rural people only listened to his drivel they’d think cities had burned to the ground. He’s an agent provocateur. He doesn’t “expose truth,” he’s committing crimes.

Andy Ngo has been caught on camera conspiring and joking around with Proud Boys and other violent extremist groups as they planned their own violence in Portland. Yet he didn't report on any of those interactions... because he's part of it.

But aren’t those groups completely racist and would never accept an Asian into their fold?

Are you kidding? The Proud Boys would use anyone as a means to an end. They had a Latino national leader who got kicked out in 2020 because he no longer ‘represented’ the face they wanted to portray. I’m sure he was shocked at the betrayal…

https://www.insider.com/ousted-proud-boys-underling-attempts-white-supremacist-coup-2020-11

I was waiting for this response. So predictable. I know, Antifa are the good guys. Why they only want change!

Couple of classic con mistakes in your post coming from your deep well of ignorance.

First, Democrats don’t support “antifa” (although we should be anti-fascist. It’s really only Republicans who embrace fascism) and antifa sure as shet doesn’t support the Democrats. If you’d ever personally known any actual far left people, you’d understand their derision for Democrats.

Second, “antifa” isn’t really a thing in the same way that right wing terrorists are. They’re not well coordinated. They’re not a monolith. And they don’t have big numbers. They also don’t have support from within any political party, whereas Andy Ngo and the Proud Boys, Boogaloo Bois, all sorts of domestic terrorists are coddled and supported by Republicans.

They don’t want change. They want to blow up the system.



Do you ever get tired of believing you know anything? Do you never get frustrated that your media choices are keeping you stupid?

Antifa is not a thing. The left created this false boogeyman to try to unite the crazies against anyone who criticized he or his goons. Drumpsters used the term to try to normalize fascism. The Portland problem is caused by anarchists. We now have them on both sides of the left/right spectrum. All of this is artifically created mayhem orchestrated by outside forces. We are being manipulated by governments outside of our own.

This actually makes a lot of sense. One of the countries I lived in had "professional" anarchists who would come out during orderly public protests and throw Molotov cocktails, burn cars, and smash store windows. They did this regardless of which party was in power at the time--the left or the right. They didn't GAF and just wanted to create chaos. They weren't carrying signs or espousing specific policies. It was more a way of life than an ideology and they were usually disaffected young men.

The only thing I'm not sure about is who is "orchestrating" this in the US. I mean, it's possible, but have you seen any solid evidence? Sadly, it wouldn't take much at this point to have all sides (left, right, and everyone else) go at each other.

It is destabilizing our country and taking focus off of important issues. It has also been used to stop any civil rights movement whenever they occur. Let's face it, when people were trapped at home they had their eyes opened to what was happening to some people in our country. The positive movement against racism has been clouded by the work of anarchists.

I hate racists, I hate people who've gone too far in either direction but more than anything, I hate anarchists.

[Anonymous]

Koch's have been in bed with the Russians for multiple generations. I would start there.

The "horseshoe theory" is likely apt here, and it will be up to traditional conservatives to stand with the dems to stem this tide of craziness until we can get our country back and root out the evil.

[Anonymous]

If you read anything about what some countries have done to try to destabilize other countries, near the top of the list is what we have going on here. The republicans know this. Why do they want to destroy our country? They aren't fighting for anything they believe in. They just want to bring down everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you read anything about what some countries have done to try to destabilize other countries, near the top of the list is what we have going on here. The republicans know this. Why do they want to destroy our country? They aren't fighting for anything they believe in. They just want to bring down everything.

They have been trying to bring the country down on multiple fronts for decades. They have wanted to call a Constitutional Convention, they have installed judges friendly to their whackjob theories at all levels of our judiciary, they have worked with foreign countries to weaken the US, they basically own the corporate media (and have convinced people that the corporate media is somehow leftist, despite zero evidence), they have destabilized cities as best as they can (umbrella man was the tip of the iceberg).

They think they can re-make this country into a fascist white supremacist nation in which brown men are second class citizens or slaves and women aren’t citizens at all.

And the cons on this thread applaud it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

Umm no. Journalists declare who they are, carry press insignia/passes, and identify what they're doing. They don't sneak around like rats trying to find or cause mayhem.

All he does is film people in public places. You don't need a press pass for that. He's never been credibly accused of "causing mayhem" but he has filmed a lot of other people committing mayhem. Those are the people who complain about him.

Exactly this. Of course they don’t want him there, filming their crimes and posting them for all to see. Duh!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

If he’s exposing left-wing anarchists, then more power to him. He’s not the one creating chaos and mayhem. He’s simply documenting it. Which begs the question - why are you apologizing for the criminal anarchists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Andy Ngo is a right wing provocatuer, full stop.

In the opinion of a typical ignorant leftist. Full stop.

This. It's amazing how much they hate him. He's nothing like Project Veritas. He posts unedited clips of people rioting in public places. That's it. That's his big crime.

He always just happens to be in whatever city there is some protest that he is capturing. It's all coincidence.




https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2021-02-08/andy-ngo-new-book-still-pretends-antifa-real-enemy

He never claimed to show up at a protest by coincidence.

Reminds me of the story of a bunch of fires in a small town and one man always being found in the crowd when it happened. Turns out the little fire watcher was actually the arsonist.

+1
He’s a useless little sht provocateur. He has definitely edited some of little videos and misrepresented others. Slimy republicans think he’s a good person, but they have lost their ability to perceive who is a good person.

Absolute BS. You know who the actual little shit provocateurs are? The rioting, arsonist, anarchists. Where’s your vitriol for them? Disgusting apologist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

“Inflammatory language,” like the OP used? Oh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

Little Andy seems more like a snitch than a journalist. He also ran and hid in a hotel with over 50 police protecting him. If he was an actual journalist, he would have be honest and not acted like a snitch.

A snitch? What we you, a five year old imbecile?

+1
Like all the rioters, the PP is indeed an imbecile who doesn’t want to get caught. Probably the middle school bully who beat up anyone “snitching” on him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was probably trying to blend in while documenting what antifa and BLM were up to. Do you have a (credible) source stating otherwise?

+1

This is what actual investigative media does.

+2
And note - he wasn’t setting anything on fire or destroying government buildings and businesses. He was there to document those who do. Good for him.

No. -2. How do we know he wasn't there to cause trouble? People infiltrating protest groups to cause trouble happens quite a bit more than people realize, for example the Boogaloo Bois who have repeatedly been caught for arson, vandalism, violence, molotov cocktails, ambush attacks on police officers and attacks on police departments under the guise of "BLM/Antifa" - with notorious examples being the "Umbrella Man" in Minneapolis but also arrests in a half dozen other cities. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbrella-man-associated-white-supremacist-group-george-floyd/index.html

Also, Andy Ngo has previously been exposed for having rather cozy relationships with Proud Boys and other violent far right extremists and domestic terrorist (whom he does NOT do "investigative journalism" against) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/

+1
He is 100% there to cause trouble and create a narrative, like the PP who said if rural people only listened to his drivel they’d think cities had burned to the ground. He’s an agent provocateur. He doesn’t “expose truth,” he’s committing crimes.

DP. Please tell us how he is committing crimes. Be very specific. No need to detail all the crimes being committed around him - those have been well documented.