Sure they would. People without kids. |
I hate to contradict this, but DC does not have the demographics of America or even the rest of the DMV. There are few middle class residents of any kind. Our upper income families include a black minority. Our lower income families include almost zero white people. So we can say it is "not true" that "all brown kids are poor" but the massive intersectionality of race and class in DC is totally skewed. |
| I'll tell you what would happen. Catholic schools in the close in PG/MoCo suburbs would revive and be filled to capacity, like when I was an elementary schooler in the 90s. |
Why do people without kids need a house? I would stay in an apartment. |
Right, but if people in Wards 7 and 8 (where the majority of the at-risk children live) there would little racial diversity and only some economic diversity. There would not be enough MC and UMC BIPOC or white families in many neighborhoods in these wards to go from "poor performing" to wonderful. It would benefit us if everyone went to their IB school, because we are in-bound for Takoma (not awful, largely OOB in upper grades), Wells (un-tested), and Coolidge (awful for the last 20+ years). There are enough BIPOC in Takoma to make for racially diverse schools (great), but probably not a lot of economic diversity. If Wells/Coolidge were largely IB, because of the price of housing, the schools would improve as PP said because of time and money investment. |
People without kids are not second-class citizens - they are just as worthy of having a house if they so choose. They might have elderly parents. They might have siblings who need a hand-up. They might have dogs. They might like space. We do not get to dictate what people "need" if they have the finances to do so. |
Group houses are a thing. But also, some people just want the space. |
Yes, people are willing to pay higher costs of housings for access to the lottery. Access to better schools is an amenity that is factored into home prices. |
The difference in prices between when the charters started and now is substantial. |
|
The difference in prices between when the charters started and now is substantial. Exactly. The biggest, unspoken political irony in D.C. is that House Repubs saved the city and created the housing boom when they imposed charter schools on angry D.C. residents and, yes, the ever-screaming WTU. |
NP. I am not sure what you mean by “widely available.” Are you referring to the centralized lottery system, which started in 2014? Or something else? DC has had charter schools since the 1990s. |
2008 was the beginning of the modern era in terms of OOB. It wasn't a big deal up to then, DCPS didn't have crowded schools and principals were given discretion to let in whoever they wanted, which was pretty much everyone. Then, suddenly in 2008, Deal wasn't able to admit everyone who wanted to go there. A year earlier Deal had been actively recruiting OOB students. In response, feeder OOB rights were created out of thin air, and all of a sudden the lottery started having real meaning. Now, I would argue that causality flowed the other way -- enrollment didn't grow because of the lottery, the lottery was necessary because enrollment started growing. |
| DCUM just recycles the same conversations again and again and again with each crop of newbie parents. No new ground broken here. It’s just new parents who learn for themselves all the problems with DC schools and then think they have the solution for what ails them. As the parent of high schoolers it’s sort of precious to see. |
| Would work IF DC had a magnet option in every school or a cluster of schools....see MOCO... |
Instead, DCPS does things like “honors for all” and now “ap for all” (see Wilson). If you can’t close the gap then dumb it down for the advanced kid and slap a name on it that makes everyone feel good. |