Jeff Cup Girls Final Verdict

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually, no one cares about GA. They are obsolete. Even more so next year.

And yet you're the only one talking about them. GA seems to living rent free in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, it's like some of you can't understand 2+2. I think the purpose of the first post was to eliminate the debate using statistics. I just can't understand how anyone can't understand the point but rather just makes excuses or complains.

ECNL outperformed GA by leaps and bounds at Jeff Cup. At this point GA should call it a day and just go to USYS/State Cup. It would benefit everyone involved IMO if "leagues" don't matter.

/thread

Honestly all these leagues would be better and better serve the players if they were more regionalized and localized. "National" leagues for youth sports are just plain stupid. But they are all businesses designed to serve clubs and league before they serve any the players - from ECNL on down.

Pssst, a little secret for you, these are actually "regional leagues". The only "National" component comes with the National showcases.

It is not a secret. Anyone in these silly leagues knows about the national showcases. And I stand by the claim that they are stupid and serve a tiny fraction of the players at huge expense. There are a few dozen players that head far off the eastern seaboard to go to college. We dont need an exclusionary "national" showcase for that. Have one east and west or maybe just north, south, east, west and be done with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, no one cares about GA. They are obsolete. Even more so next year.

And yet you're the only one talking about them. GA seems to living rent free in your head.

Yeah. You’re right. The GA is living rent free in my head.

[Anonymous]

If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

You don’t see the flaw with your basic analysis either...or do you and choose to ignore.

These were the “better” GA clubs that entered and performed poorly.

[Anonymous]

FCV is a top GA club with top ranked GA teams. They didn’t live up to the hype.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, no one cares about GA. They are obsolete. Even more so next year.

And yet you're the only one talking about them. GA seems to living rent free in your head.

Yeah. You’re right. The GA is living rent free in my head.

You keep bringing it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, no one cares about GA. They are obsolete. Even more so next year.

And yet you're the only one talking about them. GA seems to living rent free in your head.

Yeah. You’re right. The GA is living rent free in my head.

You keep bringing it up.

Because Im worried.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

Who in the GA can skew those numbers next year? No one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

Who in the GA can skew those numbers next year? No one

Somehow you continue to find a way to bring up GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

Who in the GA can skew those numbers next year? No one

Somehow you continue to find a way to bring up GA.

Your numbers are still wrong (and you conveniently ignore your sampling errors). Also, you keep slicing the numbers to reinforce a point which is statistically invalid. Your analysis is wrong and therefore your data is not actual - just meaningless. This is simple college statistics, it shouldn’t be too hard. I know math and I wish you would stop giving statistics a bad name, we need no more math deniers.


But it is Ok, we always let the younger kids take 3 or 4 free throws for everyone of ours when we play basketball. It give the kids a better chance to succeed and feel good about themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

Who in the GA can skew those numbers next year? No one

Somehow you continue to find a way to bring up GA.

Your numbers are still wrong (and you conveniently ignore your sampling errors). Also, you keep slicing the numbers to reinforce a point which is statistically invalid. Your analysis is wrong and therefore your data is not actual - just meaningless. This is simple college statistics, it shouldn’t be too hard. I know math and I wish you would stop giving statistics a bad name, we need no more math deniers.


But it is Ok, we always let the younger kids take 3 or 4 free throws for everyone of ours when we play basketball. It give the kids a better chance to succeed and feel good about themselves.

What’s the odds that anyone really cares? Statically speaking. This is nothing more than a banter forum

[Anonymous]

No one really cares, but it’s fun to debate especially with people that don’t know how to support their debates with facts or worse, make up facts. It’s kinda like politics, except those clowns get paid to debate, we do it as a way to pass the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I have a bracket of 12 (U16), 8 are ECNL, 2 are GA and 2 are EDP, Aren’t the odds of an ECNL team winning the bracket 8/12 or 67%? Aren’t the odds of a GA or EDP team wining 16%? Do clubs lose basic math skills when they enter ECNL? Is that why they have 20-30 kids on the roster (too hard to count to 18)? Or, do they need to swarm the competitions to win (kind of a Chinese tactic in war)?

Ok, first off, your "roster" opinion is just that, an opinion. Many GA teams also have large rosters so it is a mood point.

Secondly, looks like 155 teams were included in this. So using your same logic ECNL should have 52.9% of teams in finals followed by 25.8% GA, 14.2% EDP and 7% others if all things were equal...

Now, of the final appearances there was 38 teams. 29 of 38 were ECNL for 76%. 6 of 38 were GA for 15.7%. 5% went for EDP and 2.6% for CCL.

If you get into Championship Divisions won, the numbers even leans more towards ECNL's over all performance. Sure, you could certainly break it down by each division but you are only going to find a similar answer.

Again, this was just to show actual Data between the long debate. The only thing that lives in my head is watching people argue over who's better, more competitive, so on, so forth without any data to back up an opinion. ECNL wins this round. We'll see what happens next year, hopefully post CoVid.

Who in the GA can skew those numbers next year? No one

Somehow you continue to find a way to bring up GA.

Your numbers are still wrong (and you conveniently ignore your sampling errors). Also, you keep slicing the numbers to reinforce a point which is statistically invalid. Your analysis is wrong and therefore your data is not actual - just meaningless. This is simple college statistics, it shouldn’t be too hard. I know math and I wish you would stop giving statistics a bad name, we need no more math deniers.


But it is Ok, we always let the younger kids take 3 or 4 free throws for everyone of ours when we play basketball. It give the kids a better chance to succeed and feel good about themselves.

Sigh... this arrogance is probably why you can’t make quick but informed business decisions and probably just resort to a job security approach. Nitpick so nothing happens.