LCPS | in-person returning at all in Q3 or hopes just for Q4?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Well, yes. Your last line is exactly what school boards are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Well, yes. Your last line is exactly what school boards are.

Presumably voters are choosing someone they think has relevant experience and can make good decisions. Versus choosing someone at random. The problem is that so few people run for these postions they are often literally unopposed or essentially unopposed. I'm in Reaser's district. She has no particular qualifications and her child goes to TJ. But my only alternative to voting for her was a RWNJ whose main platform was school vouchers for religious school. So it wasn't much of a choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....












..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....












..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

No. They should meet in schools and do it , they’re impervious to spread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

But schools can have classes or 17. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

But schools can have classes or 17. Got it.

The Governor specifically exempted schools. By name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

But schools can have classes or 17. Got it.

The Governor specifically exempted schools. By name.

Tells you a lot about the pAnDeMiC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

But schools can have classes or 17. Got it.

The Governor specifically exempted schools. By name.

Tells you a lot about the pAnDeMiC

Reductions on Social Gatherings: All social gatherings must be limited to 10 individuals, down from the previous cap of 25 individuals. A “social gathering” includes, but is not limited to, parties, celebrations, or other social events, whether they occur indoors or outdoors. This does not apply to religious services, employment settings, or educational settings. Capacity at restaurants and retail stores are already governed by strict social distancing requirements, and are also not limited by these restrictions.

Is a school board meeting a social gathering? Is it not an employment setting or educational setting? If neither, does it have another specific classification?

https://www.virginia.gov/coronavirus/forwardvirginia/faq/#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20restrictions%20for,no%20more%20than%2010%20people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....

..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

They aren’t meeting in person with masks?

They were until the Governor reducing gathering sizes to 10.

But schools can have classes or 17. Got it.

The Governor specifically exempted schools. By name.

Tells you a lot about the pAnDeMiC

Reductions on Social Gatherings: All social gatherings must be limited to 10 individuals, down from the previous cap of 25 individuals. A “social gathering” includes, but is not limited to, parties, celebrations, or other social events, whether they occur indoors or outdoors. This does not apply to religious services, employment settings, or educational settings. Capacity at restaurants and retail stores are already governed by strict social distancing requirements, and are also not limited by these restrictions.

Is a school board meeting a social gathering? Is it not an employment setting or educational setting? If neither, does it have another specific classification?

https://www.virginia.gov/coronavirus/forwardvirginia/faq/#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20restrictions%20for,no%20more%20than%2010%20people.

Ill let u answer dem questions. All I kno is the people in charge are Callin the shots( and forcing others into closed quarters).... from the comfort of their home. Lawls