LCPS | in-person returning at all in Q3 or hopes just for Q4?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Staff no longer has to report to do DL in buildings 1/12 which is a relief but I am still thinking the board shifts to school metrics and adopts hybrid opening starting in January at next weeks meeting. If they stick with community metrics; I think calling staff in the first day after a metric drops is fine since if it drops 5 more straight days that’s when kids come in. We don’t need to be there weeks and weeks before getting needlessly exposed and then being short handed on staff when it’s time for the kids to come in. 5 days in advance is plenty, there’s not much we need to do to prepare for them anyway

Where does it say we no longer have to go to school next Tuesday 1/12?

The superintendent sent an email last night

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Staff no longer has to report to do DL in buildings 1/12 which is a relief but I am still thinking the board shifts to school metrics and adopts hybrid opening starting in January at next weeks meeting. If they stick with community metrics; I think calling staff in the first day after a metric drops is fine since if it drops 5 more straight days that’s when kids come in. We don’t need to be there weeks and weeks before getting needlessly exposed and then being short handed on staff when it’s time for the kids to come in. 5 days in advance is plenty, there’s not much we need to do to prepare for them anyway

Where does it say we no longer have to go to school next Tuesday 1/12?

The superintendent sent an email last night

Until when?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Staff no longer has to report to do DL in buildings 1/12 which is a relief but I am still thinking the board shifts to school metrics and adopts hybrid opening starting in January at next weeks meeting. If they stick with community metrics; I think calling staff in the first day after a metric drops is fine since if it drops 5 more straight days that’s when kids come in. We don’t need to be there weeks and weeks before getting needlessly exposed and then being short handed on staff when it’s time for the kids to come in. 5 days in advance is plenty, there’s not much we need to do to prepare for them anyway

Where does it say we no longer have to go to school next Tuesday 1/12?

The superintendent sent an email last night

Until when?!

Until the SB decides something at the 1/12 voting meeting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Staff no longer has to report to do DL in buildings 1/12 which is a relief but I am still thinking the board shifts to school metrics and adopts hybrid opening starting in January at next weeks meeting. If they stick with community metrics; I think calling staff in the first day after a metric drops is fine since if it drops 5 more straight days that’s when kids come in. We don’t need to be there weeks and weeks before getting needlessly exposed and then being short handed on staff when it’s time for the kids to come in. 5 days in advance is plenty, there’s not much we need to do to prepare for them anyway

Where does it say we no longer have to go to school next Tuesday 1/12?

The superintendent sent an email last night

Until when?!

Until the SB decides something at the 1/12 voting meeting

Hol up wait, Scott’s email talks something about a third metric. What metric is that? I was under the impression we had cases per 100,000 souls and PPR.

whaT aM I miSSing?

[Anonymous]

They may be adding in-school transmission as a metric. We won’t know until the 1/12 meeting. They want kids back in school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Staff no longer has to report to do DL in buildings 1/12 which is a relief but I am still thinking the board shifts to school metrics and adopts hybrid opening starting in January at next weeks meeting. If they stick with community metrics; I think calling staff in the first day after a metric drops is fine since if it drops 5 more straight days that’s when kids come in. We don’t need to be there weeks and weeks before getting needlessly exposed and then being short handed on staff when it’s time for the kids to come in. 5 days in advance is plenty, there’s not much we need to do to prepare for them anyway

Where does it say we no longer have to go to school next Tuesday 1/12?

The superintendent sent an email last night

Until when?!

Until the SB decides something at the 1/12 voting meeting

Hol up wait, Scott’s email talks something about a third metric. What metric is that? I was under the impression we had cases per 100,000 souls and PPR.

whaT aM I miSSing?

Where have you been. It’s what they discussed Tuesday . Either keeping the community metrics or moving to a school based metrics plan that means schools will individually have to close if their spread goes up but means no matter what community spread looks like they open. This is what they vote on next Tuesday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barts and Corbo won’t go “stricter” per se they will just say stay with the already set community metrics

Barts has been pretty clear she does not think 6-12 should go back at all, at any point this school year.

Easy for her to say as her kids have been going to in-person school, camps, etc. all along. She sucks.

She said her kids are DL for the year

She has one 6th grade daughter (and a college student.) The daughter does sports and other extracurriculars.

Really weird you know that.

Why? It wasn’t internet sleuthing. She blabs all about it.

She happily sends her kids into school (college), activities, etc. as she holds all of our kids out of school......

She is an absolute piece of human excrement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barts and Corbo won’t go “stricter” per se they will just say stay with the already set community metrics

Barts has been pretty clear she does not think 6-12 should go back at all, at any point this school year.

Easy for her to say as her kids have been going to in-person school, camps, etc. all along. She sucks.

She said her kids are DL for the year

She has one 6th grade daughter (and a college student.) The daughter does sports and other extracurriculars.

Really weird you know that.

Why? It wasn’t internet sleuthing. She blabs all about it.

She happily sends her kids into school (college), activities, etc. as she holds all of our kids out of school......

She is an absolute piece of human excrement.

Damn, for less than that I got banned

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barts and Corbo won’t go “stricter” per se they will just say stay with the already set community metrics

Barts has been pretty clear she does not think 6-12 should go back at all, at any point this school year.

Easy for her to say as her kids have been going to in-person school, camps, etc. all along. She sucks.

She said her kids are DL for the year

She has one 6th grade daughter (and a college student.) The daughter does sports and other extracurriculars.

Really weird you know that.

Why? It wasn’t internet sleuthing. She blabs all about it.

She happily sends her kids into school (college), activities, etc. as she holds all of our kids out of school......

She is an absolute piece of human excrement.

First of all that’s a horrible thing to say about someone but second of all, nothing she has done has warranted that even if you disagree with her.

[Anonymous]

Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barts and Corbo won’t go “stricter” per se they will just say stay with the already set community metrics

Barts has been pretty clear she does not think 6-12 should go back at all, at any point this school year.

Easy for her to say as her kids have been going to in-person school, camps, etc. all along. She sucks.

She said her kids are DL for the year

She has one 6th grade daughter (and a college student.) The daughter does sports and other extracurriculars.

Really weird you know that.

Why? It wasn’t internet sleuthing. She blabs all about it.

She happily sends her kids into school (college), activities, etc. as she holds all of our kids out of school......

She is an absolute piece of human excrement.

Damn, for less than that I got banned

From what? Here you are.

[Anonymous]

I'm feeling really sad that my MS-er who chose hybrd just has to keep waiting and waiting and waiting. So disappointing. Its clear no one but Morse and Serotkin care about the older students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cringes at the fact that the same people who deemed dangerous and unsafe a an in-person instruction in august are now doing everything to cater enraged pitchfork-bearing parents and go in at the WORST moment of the never-ending pandemic?

They have no expertise and no training, either in running a school district nor in public health. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing. None of them have even held public office before and not to sound sexist but I don't think the women even have real other jobs (this is a part time job.) Also very few of them even have children in the system.

This would be like if you picked 9 of your neighbors at random and asked them to make these decisions.

Additionally, the people forcing kids and staff into virus-bearing potential death camps are making the decision.....



Wait for it....












..........virtually!!! Without even meeting.


The joke tells itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm feeling really sad that my MS-er who chose hybrd just has to keep waiting and waiting and waiting. So disappointing. Its clear no one but Morse and Serotkin care about the older students.

This is a very self serving position. The PCR is 14.9% and it’s 464/100k today. That is ridiculously high community spread to pretend it won’t reflect in the buildings particularly in the 6-12 buildings with older kids who aren’t cohorted and have much more exposure. This is not about your one middle schooler. Parents of self contained sped students are suffering deepest right now but that’s also high risk for those students. Nobody is denying you anything; people are just trying to stay safe.
Anyway they might just change it next week and you can send your kid in with that community spread and take the risk after all.