Newest Duggar baby?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New poster.

Circling back to the original post. In the recent photos it does look like she has Down’s syndrome. Which isn’t a bad thing at all of course, and she’s a nice baby.

What are you looking at? I saw all the recent pics posted and that does NOT look like a baby with DS. You are delusional if you think so.

[Anonymous]

No part of her looks like she has DS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No part of her looks like she has DS.

Her dad looks super creepy though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No part of her looks like she has DS.

Her dad looks super creepy though.

Parents are creepy AF. Baby looks normal to me...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems really unkind to play “guess the disability” no matter how much you dislike the family.

I second this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh look, a 20 year old Duggar son is running for public office on a "pro-life" platform, because I'm sure he has a lot of wisdom on women's reproductive health as a 20 year old young man....

https://www.instagram.com/jed_duggar/

Not seeing an issue.

Same. Plenty of people respect life. Get over it.

He's not respecting life he's pro birth that's it. It's not like his family doesn't take tons of handouts.

And it's none of his business what a female does with her body!

There are at least two bodies involved in a pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No part of her looks like she has DS.

How is this creepy? It is a happy young family posing for a picture. It looks exactly like millions of other baby photo shoots. So much judgment of appearances. People don't choose their faces and calling someone creepy based on their look is just wrong. Do you want someone sexing your kid or husband is a creep from looking at a picture of him?

And then attacking a newborns looks?

What is wrong with you people?

[Anonymous]

Wait, how far along was she that she named the zygote? It founded in the article that the miscarriage was pretty early. Yet somehow she knew it was a boy?

Ugh.

The baby is cute, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait, how far along was she that she named the zygote? It founded in the article that the miscarriage was pretty early. Yet somehow she knew it was a boy?

Ugh.

The baby is cute, though.

She said 7 weeks in an interview on the show. I believe they did testing to see what caused it which is how they knew gender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No part of her looks like she has DS.

How is this creepy? It is a happy young family posing for a picture. It looks exactly like millions of other baby photo shoots. So much judgment of appearances. People don't choose their faces and calling someone creepy based on their look is just wrong. Do you want someone sexing your kid or husband is a creep from looking at a picture of him?

And then attacking a newborns looks?

What is wrong with you people?

I’m with you. Some people posting on here are complete a-holes. Hope know one ever judges their babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, how far along was she that she named the zygote? It founded in the article that the miscarriage was pretty early. Yet somehow she knew it was a boy?

Ugh.

The baby is cute, though.

She said 7 weeks in an interview on the show. I believe they did testing to see what caused it which is how they knew gender.

So creepy that they named the clump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, how far along was she that she named the zygote? It founded in the article that the miscarriage was pretty early. Yet somehow she knew it was a boy?

Ugh.

The baby is cute, though.

She said 7 weeks in an interview on the show. I believe they did testing to see what caused it which is how they knew gender.

So creepy that they named the clump

Ew why are you such a nasty person? Everyone grieves a miscarriage differently.

[Anonymous]

I hate the Duggars, but leave the baby alone. It looks like the mother, not like it has DC.

Her husband's closetness is only going to fly under the radar for so long. This family can't just pray the gay away (or the sexual abuse).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No part of her looks like she has DS.

How is this creepy? It is a happy young family posing for a picture. It looks exactly like millions of other baby photo shoots. So much judgment of appearances. People don't choose their faces and calling someone creepy based on their look is just wrong. Do you want someone sexing your kid or husband is a creep from looking at a picture of him?

And then attacking a newborns looks?

What is wrong with you people?

Baby looks fine. I’d like to rescue mom and baby from the creepy man holding them captive.

[Anonymous]

You guys are jerks. They are an adorable new family.



image uploader