|
No. Nope. Hell no!
Way too young and entirely too long of a flight. |
He’s asking to see them at his convenience. Why not fly with them for their safety? |
| I have an 11-year-old daughter. I don't let her take a one-hour flight unaccompanied to MA to see family. No way in hell would I let her take a 14-hour flight on her own. If your ex wants to take the kids on vacation, why can't he come and fetch them? |
|
Reminded me of a epic similar thread (everything was already discussed in those 30+ pages)
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/485520.page |
|
I flew several time unaccompanied at 13 on a 8 hour flight (international). My mother was not American and living overseas, so I flew back and forth a few times.
You know your child. I was terrified the whole time the first time, I will be honest. But, I was a very sheltered kid. |
Thanks for posting this, I’ll review. It’s Saturday, I’ve been out doing stuff all day, sorry for lack of clarification. Two kids 11 and 9, very innocent, very naive daughters. It’s a vacation, ex lives 5 mins away, we have 50/50 custody. No need to go off the rails with all of this imagined drama regarding withholding kids. Not the case. I was just asking if anyone else would consider young kids flying alone from Asia to the west coast for optional travel reasonable. I do not. My daughters have never been abroad and the longest they’ve flown is to the Midwest for a holiday visit, along with two parents! They are not sophisticated independent, international people. We are not. ExH has a new wife who travels a lot and wants to do this trip. Great! BUT they don’t want the hassle of returning back with my daughters. They want to keep traveling on their own. Seems very week, dangerous, and irresponsible to me. I said no. |
That was the right move. 1000% |
Thank you for saying so. I am perplexed why anyone would think this is ok, in the circumstances I’ve described. Mostly I am just pissed that he would cluelessly take what I perceive to be an unnecessary and very large risk for his convenience.
|
Good for you. Right move. |
| Next time, make that post your first post. Leaving out details didn’t help your cause. |
NP, not OP. This is classic DCUM: You must give full and excruciating details up front or we are allowed to speculate wildly and then come back and rip on you when our speculation is undermined by reality. This thread had imagined OP was a harpy "withholding" children from poor dear dad who never gets to see his kids and kindly wants to take them on a lovely vacation. Oh, and at least one of the kids was a teen and travel-savvy enough to handle this exciting opportunity being denied by mean helicopter mom. Reality: No teen, second kid actually younger than the first one mentioned, neither an experienced traveler, dad lives five minutes away so no "withholding" or denying him rare time with the kids. Just a thoughtless proposal by adults who want to slot two kids into an adult trip for a convenient period. And a mom with common sense enough to know it's a bad idea. |
For these purposes, what's the difference? Is it only the length of the flight? |
GOt it. You're just looking for validation, not actual opinions. |
The fact you are asking this suggests you have never flown long haul Trans-Pacific, even as an adult. |
| So why not let them have the girls for the entire trip. That will be a great experience for them. It sounds like you are more angry that the ex got married and they do these things than what is best for the kids. Find a compromise. |