Boundary review can’t come soon enough

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's my guess:
DC will make all middle and high schools city-wide schools. No more by-right, local schools at the MS and HS level. If parents know they have no guarantee to Deal or Wilson, it forces them to (1) move or (2) try out new schools with excess capacity.

We live two blocks to Hardy MS and have a baby on the way. But I'm in no way 100% expecting my kid to have a guarantee of attending 10 years from now.

I can't think of any positive benefit to doing away with neighborhood middle and high schools. Seriously, what good would it do? I mean, charter schools would benefit, but I can't think of any nonpartisan. objective, positive good that would arise out of it.

The city eliminated Shaw MS without public discussion. So, there's some indication they are willing to do away with a neighborhood middle school, for better or worse. It'll drive at least some of those affected IB to Deal... we talk about it as an option since the city isn't willing to serve our needs.

[Anonymous]

Actually I don't have kids at any of the schools I listed. Maury is a cap hill school, and should feed to SH, the cap hill middle school. SH has abysmal test scores and many of the more affluent cap hill residents avoid it. If Brent and Maury would feed to SH, then SH would improve and lots of DC kids would benefit (not just white kids). Here's an opportunity to improve a middle school, but DC won't take it. SH wouldn't become a segregated school full of only white kids. It's ridiculous to suggest that.

Unfortunately your responses are exactly what I'm talking about. It's the attitude that white and/or wealthy kids might benefit too so let's not do it, even if it would also benefit kids of other races and SES. So go ahead and keep telling people it's racist to demand high performing schools, but don't you dare say a word when DCPS and DCPCS continue to fail to deliver high performing schools. You're a big part of the problem.

Again - explain why Maury should attend SH over Tyler, Miner and Payne, all of which are closer to Stuart Hobson? Why not just sent Maury to Deal and kick Shepherd out?


So now at least one Maury booster full of themselves enough to think they get rights over every other school? So you think you're Brent community now

SH is doing just fine without you.

Yes. Plus, the Cluster, Ludlow-Taylor and JO Wilson (which feed currently) are closer than all of those listed above, to SH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's my guess:
DC will make all middle and high schools city-wide schools. No more by-right, local schools at the MS and HS level. If parents know they have no guarantee to Deal or Wilson, it forces them to (1) move or (2) try out new schools with excess capacity.

We live two blocks to Hardy MS and have a baby on the way. But I'm in no way 100% expecting my kid to have a guarantee of attending 10 years from now.

I can't think of any positive benefit to doing away with neighborhood middle and high schools. Seriously, what good would it do? I mean, charter schools would benefit, but I can't think of any nonpartisan. objective, positive good that would arise out of it.

The city eliminated Shaw MS without public discussion. So, there's some indication they are willing to do away with a neighborhood middle school, for better or worse. It'll drive at least some of those affected IB to Deal... we talk about it as an option since the city isn't willing to serve our needs.

Erasing the non-material expectation of a new Shaw Middle is not "some indication" of anything other than the Mayor's political duty to cater to the most important constituents, meaning Banneker supporters and boosters. Certainly not a real reason to get rid of neighborhood schools that actually exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's my guess:
DC will make all middle and high schools city-wide schools. No more by-right, local schools at the MS and HS level. If parents know they have no guarantee to Deal or Wilson, it forces them to (1) move or (2) try out new schools with excess capacity.

We live two blocks to Hardy MS and have a baby on the way. But I'm in no way 100% expecting my kid to have a guarantee of attending 10 years from now.

I can't think of any positive benefit to doing away with neighborhood middle and high schools. Seriously, what good would it do? I mean, charter schools would benefit, but I can't think of any nonpartisan. objective, positive good that would arise out of it.

The city eliminated Shaw MS without public discussion. So, there's some indication they are willing to do away with a neighborhood middle school, for better or worse. It'll drive at least some of those affected IB to Deal... we talk about it as an option since the city isn't willing to serve our needs.

Erasing the non-material expectation of a new Shaw Middle is not "some indication" of anything other than the Mayor's political duty to cater to the most important constituents, meaning Banneker supporters and boosters. Certainly not a real reason to get rid of neighborhood schools that actually exist.

Maybe. But it's not wrong to suggest that the city seems to be moving toward more city-wide options (such as rumors of a city-wide or application MS). And the current situation in Shaw will most certainly exacerbate the Deal IB problem. How do I know? Because I'm considering moving IB for deal by upper elementary, as are some of my neighbors.

[Anonymous]

When is the next boundary review scheduled to take place?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When is the next boundary review scheduled to take place?

The last boundary review was in 2013, with the final report in 2014. It went into effect in 2015. That was the first boundary review in 30 years.

I don't think there's any hard & fast rule that they must do a boundary review. Frankly, I think they should do it every 10 years after the Census is completed. The rumor is that Bowser may do another boundary review before the next election and then had it off to the next Mayor to implement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When is the next boundary review scheduled to take place?

DC law is every ten years so 2022.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is the next boundary review scheduled to take place?

DC law is every ten years so 2022.

2023

[Anonymous]

How does continuing to overcrowd Deal and Wilson help fix the other middle and high schools? It’s like watching a bad hostage movie. What magic resources do these schools have that makes them the envy of the city?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does continuing to overcrowd Deal and Wilson help fix the other middle and high schools? It’s like watching a bad hostage movie. What magic resources do these schools have that makes them the envy of the city?

A student body who were mostly raised in economically stable, non-traumatizing environments with highly educated parents who convey the importance of education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's my guess:
DC will make all middle and high schools city-wide schools. No more by-right, local schools at the MS and HS level. If parents know they have no guarantee to Deal or Wilson, it forces them to (1) move or (2) try out new schools with excess capacity.

We live two blocks to Hardy MS and have a baby on the way. But I'm in no way 100% expecting my kid to have a guarantee of attending 10 years from now.

I can't think of any positive benefit to doing away with neighborhood middle and high schools. Seriously, what good would it do? I mean, charter schools would benefit, but I can't think of any nonpartisan. objective, positive good that would arise out of it.

The city eliminated Shaw MS without public discussion. So, there's some indication they are willing to do away with a neighborhood middle school, for better or worse. It'll drive at least some of those affected IB to Deal... we talk about it as an option since the city isn't willing to serve our needs.

Erasing the non-material expectation of a new Shaw Middle is not "some indication" of anything other than the Mayor's political duty to cater to the most important constituents, meaning Banneker supporters and boosters. Certainly not a real reason to get rid of neighborhood schools that actually exist.

Maybe. But it's not wrong to suggest that the city seems to be moving toward more city-wide options (such as rumors of a city-wide or application MS). And the current situation in Shaw will most certainly exacerbate the Deal IB problem. How do I know? Because I'm considering moving IB for deal by upper elementary, as are some of my neighbors.

Same here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's my guess:
DC will make all middle and high schools city-wide schools. No more by-right, local schools at the MS and HS level. If parents know they have no guarantee to Deal or Wilson, it forces them to (1) move or (2) try out new schools with excess capacity.

We live two blocks to Hardy MS and have a baby on the way. But I'm in no way 100% expecting my kid to have a guarantee of attending 10 years from now.

I can't think of any positive benefit to doing away with neighborhood middle and high schools. Seriously, what good would it do? I mean, charter schools would benefit, but I can't think of any nonpartisan. objective, positive good that would arise out of it.

The city eliminated Shaw MS without public discussion. So, there's some indication they are willing to do away with a neighborhood middle school, for better or worse. It'll drive at least some of those affected IB to Deal... we talk about it as an option since the city isn't willing to serve our needs.

Erasing the non-material expectation of a new Shaw Middle is not "some indication" of anything other than the Mayor's political duty to cater to the most important constituents, meaning Banneker supporters and boosters. Certainly not a real reason to get rid of neighborhood schools that actually exist.

Maybe. But it's not wrong to suggest that the city seems to be moving toward more city-wide options (such as rumors of a city-wide or application MS). And the current situation in Shaw will most certainly exacerbate the Deal IB problem. How do I know? Because I'm considering moving IB for deal by upper elementary, as are some of my neighbors.

Same here.

Avoid moving to Lafayette or SP IB, as these schools will likely be re-boundaried out of Deal/Wilson.

[Anonymous]

PP- no chance of that happening. Not while bowser is in office and lives in Shepard park. And she is going to run for a third term. Her kid will be at Shepard in three more years so just assume SP will feed to deal then Wilson until her kid graduates!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PP- no chance of that happening. Not while bowser is in office and lives in Shepard park. And she is going to run for a third term. Her kid will be at Shepard in three more years so just assume SP will feed to deal then Wilson until her kid graduates!

Ugh. Third term? Will there be a viable opponent this time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does continuing to overcrowd Deal and Wilson help fix the other middle and high schools? It’s like watching a bad hostage movie. What magic resources do these schools have that makes them the envy of the city?

A student body who were mostly raised in economically stable, non-traumatizing environments with highly educated parents who convey the importance of education.

But the EOTP crowd never claims that at all. It’s always about unspecified “resources” and “programming”.