How come the Windsors have such great health?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:money, attention to health, physical activity. Also working -- at least in the royal sense (engagements, public appearances). Studies show that work keeps people mentally sharp and that actually retiring to just enjoy yourself is not good for your health. This is true in my experience, I can think of older people in my life who are retired, not that old, and now seem to have a hard time just dealing with going grocery shopping. My FIL was able to work through most of 80s on a reduced schedule and he was pretty sharp through then, and when he retired, his mental faculties went downhill sharply, sadly. Your brain -- you use it or lose it. Working as a older royal (work that you can tailor to your own schedule) probably helps a lot.

My father lived to 93 and was as sharp as a tack. He happily retired at 62 but continued to read and learn new things like most adults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.

Why are you spouting vile nonsense? Prince Harry is the full-blood son of Prince Charles of Wales and its disgusting for you to imply otherwise.

He's the spitting image of his grandfather idiot.





https://www.elle.com/culture/g22072707/prince-harry-prince-philip-look-a-like/https://www.elle.com/culture/g22072707/prince-harry-prince-philip-look-a-like/

W

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Good genes. No.

Try the best health care and on-call physicians money can buy from birth. Their problems are solved before it becomes an issue. The former King got a lung transplant in 1951 before regular America even knew that was a possibility.

Personal trainers. Nutritionists. Chefs who work with the nutritionists. It all adds together for excellent physical aging.

haha you are so clueless.

They are a sporting family - riders of horses, players of polo etc.
they also get full body MRIs every single year - well, those in direct line to the throne do, and then they have the top specialists in the country looking after them when a problem is detected.

God you Americans are clueless sometimes.

Queen Elizabeth doesn't ride, but she plays the ponies.
https://www.cheatsheet.com/health-fitness/queen-elizabeth-made-8-million-sport-she-absolutely-loves.html/

Yes she did. There is even some cringeworthy video of her riding in her advanced age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.

Talk about gutter gossip. I’m sure that you only read trash blogs and gossip rags like the Daily Mail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

Many people don’t think that it’s junk science—do some research. If inbreeding between close relatives often leads to the expression of harmful recessive traits, it stands to reason that the opposite is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have

Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.

Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.

Same with Kate and William's kid.

Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.

Both men chose well.

No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.

You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.

NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.

There is no chance the Harry does not come from Charles.

Look at pictures of him and his (young) grandpa side by side. They could be twins.

[Anonymous]

I can’t believe some of the crazy stuff posted here. Charles not fathering Harry, lung transplants, antidementia treatment - WTF. It’s like someone vomited the Enquirer or Weekly World News all over this forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe some of the crazy stuff posted here. Charles not fathering Harry, lung transplants, antidementia treatment - WTF. It’s like someone vomited the Enquirer or Weekly World News all over this forum.

It's called DCUM has been invaded by tumblr and royaldish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Victoria was a carrier of hemophilia. Two of her daughters and four of her granddaughters were carriers of the disease. A son, three grandsons, and four great-grandsons were all sufferers, most of whom bled to death.

Many of those outlived their expected lifespan even so, though. Tsarevich Alexei died at 13 and even he exceeded the average life expectancy for a hemophiliac of the time--and he didn't even die of hemophilia, rather of being shot point-blank in the head. Prince Leopold lived to be 30. Infante Alfonso and Infante Gonzalo survived to young adulthood, and Prince Waldemar lived to be 56.

Waldemar was also the last of Victoria's descendants with hemophilia and he died in 1945. The gene is long since gone or it would have reappeared by now in some female line.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL Good genes. No.

Try the best health care and on-call physicians money can buy from birth. Their problems are solved before it becomes an issue. The former King got a lung transplant in 1951 before regular America even knew that was a possibility.

Personal trainers. Nutritionists. Chefs who work with the nutritionists. It all adds together for excellent physical aging.

Plus, no real job. Sure they have to put on a show for the public, but no real life job stress issues, no financial stress, no major child-rearing stress-just have the nanny come more often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the biggest factor is not worrying about mortgage/bills etc. They don't have to work for a living, that in itself is a HUGE stress factor for majority people.

They are free from THAT type of stress but not others. Look at the queen's children - most have screwed up repeatedly, with spouses, adultery, idle children etc. Surely she wasn't pleased by that.