Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

He is currently guilty of besmirching the dignity of the Court, whatever he else he may or may not have done or lied about it in the past.

[Anonymous]

Man, the #FakeNews is working overtime today.
More proof that the liberals will do “whatever it takes” to try to sink this nomination.

Philip Klein
?
Verified account

@philipaklein
Follow Follow @philipaklein
More
BREAKING: Maryland police aren't reviewing second Brett Kavanaugh high school allegation, chief says, contradicting local news report -- via @stevennelson10

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/maryland-police-arent-reviewing-second-brett-kavanaugh-high-school-allegation-chief-says

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

He is currently guilty of besmirching the dignity of the Court, whatever he else he may or may not have done or lied about it in the past.

LOL! ......because the liberals are throwing allegations at him. Too funny! And, desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Avenatti case looks to be a case against Mark Judge with Kavanaugh as his accomplice. Judge appears to be an easy target, based on his own writings. Their yearbook pages and classmates recollections show that Kavanaugh and Judge were partners in FFFFFF, kegs, boofing, etc. Kavanaugh's nomination cannot survive a focus on him as Judge's running mate.

Even if half of this is true, [/b]it was back in high school for god's sake.[b]

If you want to know how the country feels, get off this heavily censored liberal forum and check out some others.

I'm sure that's a great comfort to the victim.

What victim? We have no evidence that there was a victim at all - merely a (formerly) drunk high school girl who can't remember much of anything.

Ok, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who fears the replacement nominee just as much?

No as long as it’s a man we can talk him down!

I dint see how any man would be willing to take the nomination at this point. The liberals have made it clear that they will go back to elementary achool, if necessary, to find other liberals willing to put forth accusations without evidence to take him down. Maybe it's their way of getting a fourth woman on the SCOTUS.

You tip your hand with this post. Liberals understand that women aren't interchangable and have different views, which is why they wouldn't want to just have any woman on the SCOTUS just to get a 4th woman on the Court.

I never said any woman. But libs are screeching against white males, and they clearly want a woman. (A transgendered woman, better yet!)

Every time you write “libs” you lose all credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

He is currently guilty of besmirching the dignity of the Court, whatever he else he may or may not have done or lied about it in the past.

He didn't do anything to besmirch the dignity of the Court. All I've seen thus far are unsubstantiated claims by desperate liberals, going forward with what thus far appears to be a smear campaign. Can't blame that on an innocent man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't the news channels discussing Avenatti's claims? They are only talking about Ramirez.

I don't think the news networks are prepared to discussed drunk-training an underage girl at the moment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Avenatti owes $5 million in taxes. Is he being funded by liberal money (like Soros) to take down Kavanaugh?

Seriously? Exactly who do republicans think Soros is, Midas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Because Collins and Murkowski won't vote for anyone who automatically will over-turn RvW. Kavanaugh was willing to hedge (aka, lie) his answers.'

BK was Trump's perfect SCJ nominee: has baggage, willing to lie to Congress, and is coy about his RvW stance. BK is able to be manipulated and blackmailed, which is a very appealing quality for DJT in his pending legal troubles with Mueller.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

Where there's smoke there's fire...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

He is currently guilty of besmirching the dignity of the Court, whatever he else he may or may not have done or lied about it in the past.

He didn't do anything to besmirch the dignity of the Court. All I've seen thus far are unsubstantiated claims by desperate liberals, going forward with what thus far appears to be a smear campaign. Can't blame that on an innocent man.

Remember last week, when the defense was, it cannot be true without multiple victims?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Avenatti owes $5 million in taxes. Is he being funded by liberal money (like Soros) to take down Kavanaugh?

Seriously? Exactly who do republicans think Soros is, Midas?

Are you kidding? $5 million to Soros is equivalent to the price of an ice cream cone for regular people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Avenatti owes $5 million in taxes. Is he being funded by liberal money (like Soros) to take down Kavanaugh?

But you have no problem with $200k of Kavanaugh debt disappearing mysteriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most important thing to Rs is getting a conservative SCJ who will overturn Roe V Wade. Why don't they just select another candidate? Plenty of other qualified pro life judges in the country. How about a woman?

Let the investigation of the accusations run its course and then he can be put forward for the next opening, surely Ginsberg will retire soon.

Why should he withdraw? He's not guilty of anything wrong.

Where there's smoke there's fire...

Smoke created by desperste liberals who, according to a Schumer, will do whatever is necessary to destroy Kavanaugh.