Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Daaaaaaaaaaaaamn. This is huge.

How does Fox react? Did Fox even know?

Does Hannity apologize to his audience, take a "planned vacation," or go into nuclear meltdown tonight on his show?


Fox is playing a segment called "Dogs with Jobs." Seriously.


Fox News correspondent Laura Ingle: "And he named him as Sean Hannity. Moving on...." Setting a land-speed record for reporting very, very embarrassing news for a network.
Anonymous
Somewhere a Playboy playmate is about to cash in. Cohen’s NDAs aren’t worth the napkin they are printed on.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.


So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.


And, you know this how?


He has three clients. Three.


So?


Are you that conservative SAHM in Virginia? Did you get an education? Do you think Cohen has expertise in media contracts or something? Because we have actual reported confirmation that his work for Trump and Broidy involved spiking affair stories, bim.
Anonymous
Shepard Smith just said on Fox News, "Hannity's producers are working to contact him," as word breaks that he's Michael Cohen's third, previously unnamed client
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.


So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.


And, you know this how?


He has three clients. Three.


So?


A guy like Hannity has lawyers. The reason he hired Cohen is because Cohen can do something his other lawyers can't. What are your guesses?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Somewhere a Playboy playmate is about to cash in. Cohen’s NDAs aren’t worth the napkin they are printed on.


Didn't they require the women to perjure themselves? Or was that the O'Reilly NDAs?

So many sleazy conservative men writing sh#tty NDAs that are revealed in discovery....
Anonymous
If trump and Hannity have the same "personal lawyer" is it conflict of interest that Hannity shills for trump?
Anonymous
I am old enough to remember when the President of the United States tweeted his followers to watch an groundbreaking episode of Hannity as it relates to the Coehn investigation.

Cover up
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the President of the United States tweeted his followers to watch an groundbreaking episode of Hannity as it relates to the Coehn investigation.

Cover up


Good point. Corruption at its finest between the president and state media.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If trump and Hannity have the same "personal lawyer" is it conflict of interest that Hannity shills for trump?


It would be if Sean Hannity was an actual journalist.
Anonymous
Hannity's on air attacks on Mueller are going to look really, really bad by tonight.
Anonymous
Judge Wood, to Cohen's attorneys: "It’s not that you’re not good people. It’s that you’ve miscited the law, at times."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If Hannity has been shilling hard for Trump while Trump has been helping him spike affair stories, then that's a conflict.


So, you jump right to spiking affair stories? You have proof of that?

That’s what Cohen’s practice was limited to.


And, you know this how?


He has three clients. Three.


So?


A guy like Hannity has lawyers. The reason he hired Cohen is because Cohen can do something his other lawyers can't. What are your guesses?


Damn.

I'm guessing write a blatantly illegal NDA? Something that Cohen - but no other rational lawyer - would risk their law license and bar membership to do.

Otherwise, it must be an in-kind trade between Hannity and Trump. Which would probably constitute an FEC violation, hence why no other lawyer would touch this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hannity's on air attacks on Mueller are going to look really, really bad by tonight.


Not to his audience.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: