Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

As a young woman, this is exactly what I want. With the way custody has been moving, it's an insane risk to both yourself and your kids to marry a man, or even have him on the birth certificate. Even in cases of extreme abuse, it is usually assumed the woman has caused "parental alienation syndrome" (with her magical mind control powers, presumably) and custody is split 50-50. Almost all abuse is carried out by men. So if you happen to make the mistake of marrying a guy who later turns out to be a child abuser, in whatever form, you are screwed, and, more importantly, your kids are screwed.

Men today are just uneccessary and more of a burden than anything else, with their lack of willingness to do equal housework and childcare. I know many women my own age who feel the same way.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the future- whether men will start putting in more effort in order to secure their genetic future. Too late for this generation, though.

Shouldn't you be busy preparing your next post for Jezebel? Stop slacking and get back to writing the latest expose on manspreading. Journalism needs you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

As a young woman, this is exactly what I want. With the way custody has been moving, it's an insane risk to both yourself and your kids to marry a man, or even have him on the birth certificate. Even in cases of extreme abuse, it is usually assumed the woman has caused "parental alienation syndrome" (with her magical mind control powers, presumably) and custody is split 50-50. Almost all abuse is carried out by men. So if you happen to make the mistake of marrying a guy who later turns out to be a child abuser, in whatever form, you are screwed, and, more importantly, your kids are screwed.

Men today are just uneccessary and more of a burden than anything else, with their lack of willingness to do equal housework and childcare. I know many women my own age who feel the same way.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the future- whether men will start putting in more effort in order to secure their genetic future. Too late for this generation, though.

Shouldn't you be busy preparing your next post for Jezebel? Stop slacking and get back to writing the latest expose on manspreading. Journalism needs you.

Oh man, what a compliment! I just dashed off my thoughts but I'm flattered to know you think I could/do work for one of the most widely read and respected websites.

What a charmer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Or we just don't want kids?

Men think kids are just to play with on the weekend or for 30 minutes after work. The rest? someone else does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or we just don't want kids?

Men think kids are just to play with on the weekend or for 30 minutes after work. The rest? someone else does.

Hey!! How DARE you!!! Not all men!!!

Some men also think their great as trophies to brag about and to hold over the wife's head in a custody dispute.

[Anonymous]

Agree with the coddled boys syndrome.

If their mommy did everything for her kids and father then he won't know jack about how to run a household, parent children, or life, frankly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Agree with the coddled boys syndrome.

If their mommy did everything for her kids and father then he won't know jack about how to run a household, parent children, or life, frankly.

So were all men coddled in this way? And if yes (because statistics observe this in a huge majority of men, not a small group) then what should we do about men, considering they are obviously too damaged to play a role in parenting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

As a young woman, this is exactly what I want. With the way custody has been moving, it's an insane risk to both yourself and your kids to marry a man, or even have him on the birth certificate. Even in cases of extreme abuse, it is usually assumed the woman has caused "parental alienation syndrome" (with her magical mind control powers, presumably) and custody is split 50-50. Almost all abuse is carried out by men. So if you happen to make the mistake of marrying a guy who later turns out to be a child abuser, in whatever form, you are screwed, and, more importantly, your kids are screwed.

Men today are just uneccessary and more of a burden than anything else, with their lack of willingness to do equal housework and childcare. I know many women my own age who feel the same way.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the future- whether men will start putting in more effort in order to secure their genetic future. Too late for this generation, though.



Just promise us all that you'll abort if you find your fetus is a male.

Because women like you are incapable of raising male children. So just don't do it. Terminate instead, and start over, hoping for a female.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's there for guys not to like? Being a human ATM for 18 years sounds like a blast.

Women (feminists) are reaping what they sowed. When men become expendable in a society, society suffers.

DH is not a human ATM. In fact, I supported him for a few years when he couldn't find a non-contract job. We're now established in our careers with a healthy HHI. He pays for our housing and I pay for everything else (utilities, food, all the household items, all our kid's stuff, and so on). I also handle over 80% of the childcare and housework while maintaining full-time equivalent employment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

I don't want to have a baby by myself.

I'm a man - i'd love to have a bab(ies) by myself like Cristiano Ronaldo.

The only thing that stops me is the resources I think I should need to provide the opportunities and lifestyle for any children I may have.

[Anonymous]

Hey, look. Another misandry thread!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey, look. Another misandry thread!

Of course. It draws them out. They can't HELP but chime in with men-hating

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

As a young woman, this is exactly what I want. With the way custody has been moving, it's an insane risk to both yourself and your kids to marry a man, or even have him on the birth certificate. Even in cases of extreme abuse, it is usually assumed the woman has caused "parental alienation syndrome" (with her magical mind control powers, presumably) and custody is split 50-50. Almost all abuse is carried out by men. So if you happen to make the mistake of marrying a guy who later turns out to be a child abuser, in whatever form, you are screwed, and, more importantly, your kids are screwed.

Men today are just uneccessary and more of a burden than anything else, with their lack of willingness to do equal housework and childcare. I know many women my own age who feel the same way.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the future- whether men will start putting in more effort in order to secure their genetic future. Too late for this generation, though.



Just promise us all that you'll abort if you find your fetus is a male.

Because women like you are incapable of raising male children. So just don't do it. Terminate instead, and start over, hoping for a female.

Sorry, no can do. Get ready for another "feminized" man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Odysseus wrote:The title of this thread is the most DCUM thing I've ever read.

this, This, a hundred times, THIS!


This thread title encapsulates completely the entire essence of why men don't like women anymore.


In 20 years, when realistic, animatronic sex-robots are going to be available for the cost of a motorcycle, women are going to find themselves very, very irrelevant

Can't come soon enough. How lovely to be left alone by the majority of men, who seem utterly useless under almost every study and outmatched by women across the board

The ascendance of women is not the result of anything that women have done. Men are not being "outmatched" by women. The power in this world that men have always possessed is being given blindly by silly men who bleat "not all men" to seem urbane and sophisticated. One day men will wake up and realize they've become the underclass. Feminists don't seek equality ... they won't be happy until men are oppressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have the education.
You have the career.
You have the money for a home and childcare.
You have IVF at your disposal.

You don't need men.

This is what I'm seeing more and more. Women want the family without a man. If they truly want kids it's going to be with some random guy, a bf, or the sperm bank. No custody battles, no exes bothering them, no ex in laws and all the other horrible dilemmas people get themselves into.

I don't see anything wrong with it. It's all about personal choices.

As a young woman, this is exactly what I want. With the way custody has been moving, it's an insane risk to both yourself and your kids to marry a man, or even have him on the birth certificate. Even in cases of extreme abuse, it is usually assumed the woman has caused "parental alienation syndrome" (with her magical mind control powers, presumably) and custody is split 50-50. Almost all abuse is carried out by men. So if you happen to make the mistake of marrying a guy who later turns out to be a child abuser, in whatever form, you are screwed, and, more importantly, your kids are screwed.

Men today are just uneccessary and more of a burden than anything else, with their lack of willingness to do equal housework and childcare. I know many women my own age who feel the same way.

It will be interesting to see what happens in the future- whether men will start putting in more effort in order to secure their genetic future. Too late for this generation, though.

Shouldn't you be busy preparing your next post for Jezebel? Stop slacking and get back to writing the latest expose on manspreading. Journalism needs you.

Oh man, what a compliment! I just dashed off my thoughts but I'm flattered to know you think I could/do work for one of the most widely read and respected websites.

What a charmer.

Respected by whom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Odysseus wrote:The title of this thread is the most DCUM thing I've ever read.

this, This, a hundred times, THIS!


This thread title encapsulates completely the entire essence of why men don't like women anymore.


In 20 years, when realistic, animatronic sex-robots are going to be available for the cost of a motorcycle, women are going to find themselves very, very irrelevant

Can't come soon enough. How lovely to be left alone by the majority of men, who seem utterly useless under almost every study and outmatched by women across the board

The ascendance of women is not the result of anything that women have done. Men are not being "outmatched" by women. The power in this world that men have always possessed is being given blindly by silly men who bleat "not all men" to seem urbane and sophisticated. One day men will wake up and realize they've become the underclass. Feminists don't seek equality ... they won't be happy until men are oppressed.

Bwahaha. I agree with you that men who bleat "not all men" are idiots. Unfortunately, you've just insulted yourself. Since the men who became the joke of the internet for doing that are not feminist men, but rather the losers who feel the need to chime in with that phrase whenever a woman speaks about her (sometimes horrifying) experiences with men. You know, those "feminist are being too hard on men" types. I'm sure you know the type...


But hey, at least we agreed on one thing: your intellectual capacity. Progress!