Emory University to give free financial ride to illegals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry AA folks! Sorry legal immigrants.



https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/32463/

meanwhile, the educated elite continue to segregate themselves from the middle class. Increase immigration to keep wages low, build walls around neighborhoods to protect from middle class families, and increase costs of education to keep the middle class out of the network to find good jobs and keep good opportunities.

The University recently sent a letter home to families informing them of a 3.9 percent increase in the bottom-line price tag of a year’s tuition as a full-time student at the University, which will amount to $67,136 for the 2017-2018 academic year. The cost reflects the comprehensive fee including tuition, a student government fee, and standard room and board.

http://bucknellian.net/75097/opinion/editorial-another-tuition-increase-headed-college-bubble-crisis/

67K is outrageous. What a freggin' cash cow!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I donate money every year to my private university, and if I discovered they were diverting some of their funds from Americans to illegal immigrants, I'd stop donating.

oP. This is the point of my post

PP. That's the point I was trying to make, also.

There's a similar thread running about a college offering a class that teaches students "resistance strategies" against President Trump, and the same applies there. When you take a political stand on a controversial issue, there will be fallout. Liberals are yelling "1st amendment rights," but I don't see anybody saying it's illegal to take divisive action and make divisive statements - it's just stupid. And potentially costly.

Good point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools that receive federal funding don't have the vast freedom you think they do. Signed, a smart person.

Okay, my friend. Care to cite number and verse?

Because citing sources is what the smart folks do, you know.

See, e.g., Titke IX. The vast majority of literate people know this already. Sad that I have to educate so many on the basics.

Wait. What about Title IX prohibits Emory University from offering the programs it does for undocumented immigrant students?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I donate money every year to my private university, and if I discovered they were diverting some of their funds from Americans to illegal immigrants, I'd stop donating.

oP. This is the point of my post

PP. That's the point I was trying to make, also.

There's a similar thread running about a college offering a class that teaches students "resistance strategies" against President Trump, and the same applies there. When you take a political stand on a controversial issue, there will be fallout. Liberals are yelling "1st amendment rights," but I don't see anybody saying it's illegal to take divisive action and make divisive statements - it's just stupid. And potentially costly.

I've read that thread and responded along with you. It's insane. We are outspoken about it but how many more will just silently not write the check?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools that receive federal funding don't have the vast freedom you think they do. Signed, a smart person.

Okay, my friend. Care to cite number and verse?

Because citing sources is what the smart folks do, you know.

See, e.g., Titke IX. The vast majority of literate people know this already. Sad that I have to educate so many on the basics.

Wait. What about Title IX prohibits Emory University from offering the programs it does for undocumented immigrant students?

Title IX was passed in 1972. We didn't have swarms of ILLEGAL immigrants breaking our laws.

[Anonymous]

Emory lied to college rankers for years, reportedly. Managed to up its ranking in the meantime though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools that receive federal funding don't have the vast freedom you think they do. Signed, a smart person.

Okay, my friend. Care to cite number and verse?

Because citing sources is what the smart folks do, you know.

See, e.g., Titke IX. The vast majority of literate people know this already. Sad that I have to educate so many on the basics.

Wait. What about Title IX prohibits Emory University from offering the programs it does for undocumented immigrant students?

My response was to a sweeping -- or sloppily worded -- claim about schools' money and their freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools that receive federal funding don't have the vast freedom you think they do. Signed, a smart person.

Okay, my friend. Care to cite number and verse?

Because citing sources is what the smart folks do, you know.

See, e.g., Titke IX. The vast majority of literate people know this already. Sad that I have to educate so many on the basics.

Wait. What about Title IX prohibits Emory University from offering the programs it does for undocumented immigrant students?

My response was to a sweeping -- or sloppily worded -- claim about schools' money and their freedom.

I can see why you think other people are stupid. This is a thread, a conversation. Everything is always in context.

Or did you think I was also claiming Emory could use their donation money to hire assassins? (That would be illegal. It is an existing constraint. It was not in the topic of conversation. I did not specifically exclude it. I am doing so now. There are other constraints, as well. I am not specifying them. If you need them specified -- all of them -- I'm afraid I don't know how to help you. My apologies for that.)

Of course there are constraints. There are not constraints in the way you want, and in the area we are discussing. If you want there to be constraints in the area we are discussing, you cannot make Title IX do the job. You will have to ensure that new legislation is passed.

If you do that, do it with the knowledge that such constraints are a two-edged sword. In general, the people opposing this are people who oppose expanding the scope of the federal government's purview.

If you actually do look forward to expanding the scope of the federal government's oversight, then you'd best get to passing that legislation for the area we are discussing.

Have at it!

[Anonymous]

Title IX does not cover immigration status.