Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Emory University to give free financial ride to illegals"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Schools that receive federal funding don't have the vast freedom you think they do. Signed, a smart person.[/quote] Okay, my friend. Care to cite number and verse? Because citing sources is what the smart folks do, you know.[/quote] See, e.g., Titke IX. The vast majority of literate people know this already. Sad that I have to educate so many on the basics.[/quote] Wait. What about Title IX prohibits Emory University from offering the programs it does for undocumented immigrant students? [/quote] My response was to a sweeping -- or sloppily worded -- claim about schools' money and their freedom. [/quote] I can see why you think other people are stupid. This is a thread, a conversation. Everything is always in context. Or did you think I was also claiming Emory could use their donation money to hire assassins? (That would be illegal. It is an existing constraint. It was not in the topic of conversation. I did not specifically exclude it. I am doing so now. There are other constraints, as well. I am not specifying them. If you need them specified -- all of them -- I'm afraid I don't know how to help you. My apologies for that.) [i]Of course[/i] there are constraints. There are not constraints [i]in the way you want, and in the area we are discussing[/i]. If you want there to be constraints [i]in the area we are discussing[/i], you cannot make Title IX do the job. You will have to ensure that new legislation is passed. [i]If you do that[/i], do it with the knowledge that such constraints are a two-edged sword. In general, the people opposing this are people who oppose expanding the scope of the federal government's purview. If you actually do look forward to expanding the scope of the federal government's oversight, then you'd best get to passing that legislation [i]for the area we are discussing.[/i] Have at it! :D[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics