Is anyone watching Spicer's press conference?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure he was trying to call them out on their misrepresentation and attempts to portray him in a negative light. I've heard lots of talk about the numbers, but has anyone mentioned how the Time reporter suggested that Trump removed the MLK bust from the Oval Office? That was a ridiculous accusation to tweet out and be wrong about it.

Did it ever occur to you that the President of the United States should be above getting in fights on twitter in regards to furniture in his Oval Office? That his Press Secretary should not call an emergency press conference on a Saturday afternoon lambasting reporters over a model head and crowd optics? Let's forget the angry tones, the diatribe, and the lies. It's BENEATH him. I don't even know what to say anymore...he's not a president, he's a child.

I agree that it was an overreaction. But regarding the bust, can you even imagine a reporter accusing another president of removing the bust of a revered civil rights leader from the Oval Office on the very first day in office? Without confirming that it was so? I promise you, it would never happen. You think there was no hope on that reporter's part of advancing a certain agenda with that misstatement? Anyone even trying to be unbiased can admit that was very irresponsible, and extremely unlikely to have been an accident.

I agree, you're right. In some ways the reporters are harsher on Donald J. Trump. They are not out to 'get him', they're out to catch him in a lie. To find something that irrefutably proves he is the demon that liberal party thinks he is. I'll admit, if they find something that is enough to impeach him on within the first term, I will cry tears of joy. If this was any other president I would not say that. But Trump is not a president we can live with. His temper, his antics, his honest disrespect for the office and the traditions held dear, are just untenable.

In fact, some of his broad policies I actually agree with. But knowing that this is the individual that holds our nuclear codes, that this is the individual that is in charge of all governmental departments (he lambasted the National Park Service yesterday for a freaking image), and that this is the person that at any time can order rendition of a citizen...just leaves me cold. The thing is...I'm not the only one. We're just trying to do something about it.

[Anonymous]

"This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period."

Who gives a shit build the wall already stop whining about nonsense and make the country great already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure he was trying to call them out on their misrepresentation and attempts to portray him in a negative light. I've heard lots of talk about the numbers, but has anyone mentioned how the Time reporter suggested that Trump removed the MLK bust from the Oval Office? That was a ridiculous accusation to tweet out and be wrong about it.

Did it ever occur to you that the President of the United States should be above getting in fights on twitter in regards to furniture in his Oval Office? That his Press Secretary should not call an emergency press conference on a Saturday afternoon lambasting reporters over a model head and crowd optics? Let's forget the angry tones, the diatribe, and the lies. It's BENEATH him. I don't even know what to say anymore...he's not a president, he's a child.

I agree that it was an overreaction. But regarding the bust, can you even imagine a reporter accusing another president of removing the bust of a revered civil rights leader from the Oval Office on the very first day in office? Without confirming that it was so? I promise you, it would never happen. You think there was no hope on that reporter's part of advancing a certain agenda with that misstatement? Anyone even trying to be unbiased can admit that was very irresponsible, and extremely unlikely to have been an accident.

I agree, you're right. In some ways the reporters are harsher on Donald J. Trump. They are not out to 'get him', they're out to catch him in a lie. To find something that irrefutably proves he is the demon that liberal party thinks he is. I'll admit, if they find something that is enough to impeach him on within the first term, I will cry tears of joy. If this was any other president I would not say that. But Trump is not a president we can live with. His temper, his antics, his honest disrespect for the office and the traditions held dear, are just untenable.

In fact, some of his broad policies I actually agree with. But knowing that this is the individual that holds our nuclear codes, that this is the individual that is in charge of all governmental departments (he lambasted the National Park Service yesterday for a freaking image), and that this is the person that at any time can order rendition of a citizen...just leaves me cold. The thing is...I'm not the only one. We're just trying to do something about it.

They are not "out" to do that. He basically lies all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure he was trying to call them out on their misrepresentation and attempts to portray him in a negative light. I've heard lots of talk about the numbers, but has anyone mentioned how the Time reporter suggested that Trump removed the MLK bust from the Oval Office? That was a ridiculous accusation to tweet out and be wrong about it.

Did it ever occur to you that the President of the United States should be above getting in fights on twitter in regards to furniture in his Oval Office? That his Press Secretary should not call an emergency press conference on a Saturday afternoon lambasting reporters over a model head and crowd optics? Let's forget the angry tones, the diatribe, and the lies. It's BENEATH him. I don't even know what to say anymore...he's not a president, he's a child.

I agree that it was an overreaction. But regarding the bust, can you even imagine a reporter accusing another president of removing the bust of a revered civil rights leader from the Oval Office on the very first day in office? Without confirming that it was so? I promise you, it would never happen. You think there was no hope on that reporter's part of advancing a certain agenda with that misstatement? Anyone even trying to be unbiased can admit that was very irresponsible, and extremely unlikely to have been an accident.

I agree, you're right. In some ways the reporters are harsher on Donald J. Trump. They are not out to 'get him', they're out to catch him in a lie. To find something that irrefutably proves he is the demon that liberal party thinks he is. I'll admit, if they find something that is enough to impeach him on within the first term, I will cry tears of joy. If this was any other president I would not say that. But Trump is not a president we can live with. His temper, his antics, his honest disrespect for the office and the traditions held dear, are just untenable.

In fact, some of his broad policies I actually agree with. But knowing that this is the individual that holds our nuclear codes, that this is the individual that is in charge of all governmental departments (he lambasted the National Park Service yesterday for a freaking image), and that this is the person that at any time can order rendition of a citizen...just leaves me cold. The thing is...I'm not the only one. We're just trying to do something about it.

They are not "out" to do that. He basically lies all the time.

Fair enough.

[Anonymous]

Oh my god, I cringed watching that-- and I voted for Trump. They are NOT off to a good start. Trump also needs to stop talking about how many people voted for him; he was at it again today when he addressed the CIA. Trump will rapidly lose support of those who voted him in to office if he and his team don't rise above the pettiness and turn their attention to the issues people care about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is so awesome!! I love it!!! Finally we are getting some conservatives with balls!

You've got to be sarcastic now.
I attended both I inaugration.
He had just over 1/2 of what Obama had at his last inaugration.
In all the inaugrations I've attended (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Obama) I've never NEVER seen empty bleachers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, I cringed watching that-- and I voted for Trump. They are NOT off to a good start. Trump also needs to stop talking about how many people voted for him; he was at it again today when he addressed the CIA. Trump will rapidly lose support of those who voted him in to office if he and his team don't rise above the pettiness and turn their attention to the issues people care about.

Would you mind posting your litmus test?
I really want to know what will be your last straw so that we can accelerate the timeline here

[Anonymous]

I love how he talked about 'the facts' and then completely
lies about the metro use yesterday. Just flat out lies.

[Anonymous]

Trump's penis must be an innie.

[Anonymous]

I got $5 days Spicer doesn't last 6mths.
Orange Dude will blame all the negative reactions to idiotic press conferences like this on him and say, "You're fired."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure he was trying to call them out on their misrepresentation and attempts to portray him in a negative light. I've heard lots of talk about the numbers, but has anyone mentioned how the Time reporter suggested that Trump removed the MLK bust from the Oval Office? That was a ridiculous accusation to tweet out and be wrong about it.

Did it ever occur to you that the President of the United States should be above getting in fights on twitter in regards to furniture in his Oval Office? That his Press Secretary should not call an emergency press conference on a Saturday afternoon lambasting reporters over a model head and crowd optics? Let's forget the angry tones, the diatribe, and the lies. It's BENEATH him. I don't even know what to say anymore...he's not a president, he's a child.

I agree that it was an overreaction. But regarding the bust, can you even imagine a reporter accusing another president of removing the bust of a revered civil rights leader from the Oval Office on the very first day in office? Without confirming that it was so? I promise you, it would never happen. You think there was no hope on that reporter's part of advancing a certain agenda with that misstatement? Anyone even trying to be unbiased can admit that was very irresponsible, and extremely unlikely to have been an accident.

I agree, you're right. In some ways the reporters are harsher on Donald J. Trump. They are not out to 'get him', they're out to catch him in a lie. To find something that irrefutably proves he is the demon that liberal party thinks he is. I'll admit, if they find something that is enough to impeach him on within the first term, I will cry tears of joy. If this was any other president I would not say that. But Trump is not a president we can live with. His temper, his antics, his honest disrespect for the office and the traditions held dear, are just untenable.

In fact, some of his broad policies I actually agree with. But knowing that this is the individual that holds our nuclear codes, that this is the individual that is in charge of all governmental departments (he lambasted the National Park Service yesterday for a freaking image), and that this is the person that at any time can order rendition of a citizen...just leaves me cold. The thing is...I'm not the only one. We're just trying to do something about it.

Can you imagine reporters giving airtime to 8yeRs to a conspiracy theory that Trump was actually born in Nigeria? Like they were being fair and balanced by reporting that some people believe he was born in Nigeria, others Queens, we are just presenting both sides?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, I cringed watching that-- and I voted for Trump. They are NOT off to a good start. Trump also needs to stop talking about how many people voted for him; he was at it again today when he addressed the CIA. Trump will rapidly lose support of those who voted him in to office if he and his team don't rise above the pettiness and turn their attention to the issues people care about.

Fascinating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump's penis must be an innie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, I cringed watching that-- and I voted for Trump. They are NOT off to a good start. Trump also needs to stop talking about how many people voted for him; he was at it again today when he addressed the CIA. Trump will rapidly lose support of those who voted him in to office if he and his team don't rise above the pettiness and turn their attention to the issues people care about.

Fascinating.

Why?

[Anonymous]

This new "reality TV show" format for the executive branch of our government is really impressive, the Big Orange may be on to something here!