HRC - Earpiece or Hearing Aid?

[Anonymous]

Hillary had to get a wire to keep tabs on the Barksdale crew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.

Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.

Yes, you did. You erected a straw man. Hearing aid or TV earpiece -- neither of those things are "illicit." Shame on you. Jesus.

Yet... such a mountain out of a mole hill

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

Do you think she was receiving answers through an earpiece? Yes or no.

She was speaking very slow and purposeful, so yes. Sadly, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The shark has been jumped by CTR.

Trump doesn't need an earpiece. The man speaks his mind and doesn't need to do opinion polling and discuss his "positions" with a bunch of handlers before he says anything.

Silly us, wanting to elect someone who'll listen to us and represent our views.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

You are full of crap and don't like being called on it. Talk about dishonest. An earpiece "could" be used for "illicit" purposes, and you just happen to throw that out in a thread about.... Hillary Clinton maybe having an earpiece during the presidential forum.

Just like Trump with his "people are saying, I don't know, I've heard, they should maybe check out" whisper campaigns.


Wow, pp is right, you are an ASS

I'm not going to respond any longer. You are simply another disrespectful liberal who accuses everyone but Hillary of being a liar. Have a lovely day.

You're not worthy of our respect, OP. That's the point. If you're going to pull the "why won't you tolerate my intolerance" line, we're going to point, laugh, and mock you. Why do you hate America? It's clear you hate everything she stands for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary also wears a hairpiece.

She will try to laugh off the earpiece just as she tried to laugh off the wig issue - but the truth is - she does have hair extensions or I'm not sure the term for it - not a full wig, but a hair piece that attaches to her head to make her hair look fuller.

Look - when has Hillary ever been forthcoming about anything personal? NEVER.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3314041/Is-Hillary-wearing-wig-Matt-Drudge-alleges-Mrs-Clinton-fake-hair-one-personal-stylists-calls-claim-really-ridiculous.html

Please tell me there some Trump supporters out there who aren't completely unhinged conspiracy theorists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

Do you think she was receiving answers through an earpiece? Yes or no.

She was speaking very slow and purposeful, so yes. Sadly, yes.

That's how voice coaches teach you to speak. Very slowly, so that the audience can clearly understand you.

[Anonymous]

Sounding a little desperate these days, don't you think?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

Do you think she was receiving answers through an earpiece? Yes or no.

She was speaking very slow and purposeful, so yes. Sadly, yes.

Beats Trump's melange of lightly dressed and tossed verbiage.

[Anonymous]

Coherent, thoughtful responses from someone capable of speaking above a Fourth Grade level is highly overrated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.

Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

+1

[Anonymous]

http://truepundit.com/nypd-hillary-clinton-was-wearing-invisible-earpiece-to-receive-stealth-coaching-during-live-nbc-tv-town-hall/

NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,”


This is not a conspiracy theory. The New York Police Dept confirmed that she was wearing an earpiece.

The Clinton campaign has not denied this.

And no, "everybody" doesn't wear earpieces...That is ridiculous.

Normal functioning people use their own brains and don't need to be prompted about what to say by handlers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://truepundit.com/nypd-hillary-clinton-was-wearing-invisible-earpiece-to-receive-stealth-coaching-during-live-nbc-tv-town-hall/

NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,”


This is not a conspiracy theory. The New York Police Dept confirmed that she was wearing an earpiece.

The Clinton campaign has not denied this.

And no, "everybody" doesn't wear earpieces...That is ridiculous.

Normal functioning people use their own brains and don't need to be prompted about what to say by handlers.

Oh FFS. Are these the same "unnamed sources" who confirm that Jennifer Aniston is pregnant with twins, again?

The Clinton team did deny this.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/08/buzz-about-bud-clinton-camp-denies-claims-wore-earpiece-at-forum.html

By the way, looks like Trump, Jr. is pushing this earbud conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

Do you think she was receiving answers through an earpiece? Yes or no.

She was speaking very slow and purposeful, so yes. Sadly, yes.

Some of Trump's supporters were probably watching. She was probably just trying to get through to them.

[Anonymous]

you can watch some video here that shows it's kind of a reflection. Look at 42s
http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/18526-listening-in-hillary-clinton-accused-of-wearing-earpiece-during-live-tv-forum