HRC - Earpiece or Hearing Aid?

Anonymous
Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/


The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.
Anonymous
Huh? Earpieces are pretty normal on tv.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Huh? Earpieces are pretty normal on tv.

They're normal in order to get "feed" from producers. Why would HRC need one?
(What was that movie with Kevin Kline and the prep school, where the guy in the back of the room was feeding answers to the debate participant?)
Anonymous
What rubbish. She speaks too quickly to be getting answers from someone else. My god. You people seriously are deranged with your need to continually attack her for the smallest things.
Anonymous
looks like a light reflection on the inner ear, not anything in the ear
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/



Maybe Apple can hire her to work on iphone 8 ear plug.
Anonymous
Earpieces are common in media interviews. Seriously, you guys just sound crazy when you run around to every message board you can find posting the same talking points over and over again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/


The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.


Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/


The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.


Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/


The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.


Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.


Yes, you did. You erected a straw man. Hearing aid or TV earpiece -- neither of those things are "illicit." Shame on you. Jesus.
Anonymous
Didn't the wingnuts float this same stupidity with respect to Obama and the battery pack he wore on his back?
Anonymous
These allegations come up every time. I'm old enough to remember the allegations that Bush wore a wire in his debate with Kerry: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/tangled_web/2004/10/the_box_on_bushs_back.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/


The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.


Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.


Yes, you did. You erected a straw man. Hearing aid or TV earpiece -- neither of those things are "illicit." Shame on you. Jesus.

I said I didn't, and referred to an earpiece to "feed" info as the illicit device. Stop telling me what I meant. I suppose you are a mind reader now. Shame on YOU!
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: