HRC - Earpiece or Hearing Aid?

[Anonymous]

People are saying there is no point trying to combat the alt-right conspiracy fantasy junkies with facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

Do you think she was receiving answers through an earpiece? Yes or no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People are saying there is no point trying to combat the alt-right conspiracy fantasy junkies with facts.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.

Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.

Yes, you did. You erected a straw man. Hearing aid or TV earpiece -- neither of those things are "illicit." Shame on you. Jesus.

I said I didn't, and referred to an earpiece to "feed" info as the illicit device. Stop telling me what I meant. I suppose you are a mind reader now. Shame on YOU!

You should let us know that you stopped beating your spouse because ... you know ... the rumors.

Unbelievable how liberals accuse everyone BUT Hillary of being a liar! I explained very clearly what I meant, and yet you still insist on screaming....liar...liar...liar. Why not direct some of that venom about dishonest people to your queen? All of a sudden a classified email has to have a header on it, stating so? It's one lie after the other with her.

Do you have issues arising from a concussion that we need to be concerned about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

You are full of crap and don't like being called on it. Talk about dishonest. An earpiece "could" be used for "illicit" purposes, and you just happen to throw that out in a thread about.... Hillary Clinton maybe having an earpiece during the presidential forum.

Just like Trump with his "people are saying, I don't know, I've heard, they should maybe check out" whisper campaigns.

I'm not going to respond any longer. You are simply another disrespectful liberal who accuses everyone but Hillary of being a liar. Have a lovely day.

[Anonymous]

She either had some device in her ear or did not. If she did not, it is a non-issue.

If she did and it was a hearing aid, there is nothing wrong with it but just come clean. If it was not a hearing aid and some other device then it is reasonable to wonder what she has in her ear.

It really is not complicated.

[Anonymous]

Hillary should not be wearing any type of earpiece unless it is a hearing aid.

There is simply no reason for her to be receiving info from her aides during an interview or a debate, etc.

If she is unable to function without these "helpers" feeding her info, she is unfit for the Presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary should not be wearing any type of earpiece unless it is a hearing aid.

There is simply no reason for her to be receiving info from her aides during an interview or a debate, etc.

If she is unable to function without these "helpers" feeding her info, she is unfit for the Presidency.

She didn't receive any information from her aides during the forum.

[Anonymous]

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14039

Then why does Huma ask her about the "earpiece" in this 2009 email?

Hillary has some splaining to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14039

Then why does Huma ask her about the "earpiece" in this 2009 email?

Hillary has some splaining to do.

Have at it Inspector Clouseau.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14039

Then why does Huma ask her about the "earpiece" in this 2009 email?

Hillary has some splaining to do.

Wow -- she really started preparing well in advance for this forum!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14039

Then why does Huma ask her about the "earpiece" in this 2009 email?

Hillary has some splaining to do.

Because last night was not 2009? Who knows what Huma meant back then. Could it be the "earpiece" used routinely during remote interviews? Could it be that thing you use on your heat when you have a long conference call so you aren't holding the phone? Who knows? Who cares?

The spectre being raised is whether she was receiving help during the forum or even any other time and you have zero evidence of that. Come back when you have some actual evidence because I'm SURE there will be plenty of people who would be thrilled to discuss it with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

Lol. I Like the company you keep. Infowars also claimed that Pepsi uses aborted fetuses in its soft drinks and that the Obama administration is secretly behind tornadoes.

[Anonymous]

FFS. A Secretary of State frequently attends events at which a language other than English is spoken. You might have heard of something called the United Nations as one example. Instead of sitting there and not understanding what is being said, there are realtime audio translation services fed through earpieces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14039

Then why does Huma ask her about the "earpiece" in this 2009 email?

Hillary has some splaining to do.

They all wear earpieces. Trump was complaining about his earlier this year.