Elizabeth Warren's speech right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

You are vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?

Not defending Trump. Cannot stand him. But, Warren has baggage, as well. She talks about income inequality--but look at her own background. She talks about the corrupt banks--but she made money off of foreclosed homes. She talks about the cost of college, but look at what she made at Harvard--for teaching very few classes. She talks about giving everyone a fair shake--yet she claimed minority status. (Look at Harvard law faculty--I went through three or four pages of them, and they ALL had been to Ivy schools. Yet, Warren did not. Odd. She was hired there about a year after she was identified as Native American.) She's a poseur. Yes, she is entertaining, bright, and personable. And a FRAUD.

Nice story bro. Charles Fried, the staunch conservative who hired her to HLS says you're wrong. And as someone who was taught by her, I can say she was one of the best profs there.

Let me just add that Warren was considered a rising star in academic circles while before she showed any political aspirations. If you think she wasn't a successful scholar and didn't warrant her place on Harvard's faculty, you just don't like her. You've dead wrong on the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?

Not defending Trump. Cannot stand him. But, Warren has baggage, as well. She talks about income inequality--but look at her own background. She talks about the corrupt banks--but she made money off of foreclosed homes. She talks about the cost of college, but look at what she made at Harvard--for teaching very few classes. She talks about giving everyone a fair shake--yet she claimed minority status. (Look at Harvard law faculty--I went through three or four pages of them, and they ALL had been to Ivy schools. Yet, Warren did not. Odd. She was hired there about a year after she was identified as Native American.) She's a poseur. Yes, she is entertaining, bright, and personable. And a FRAUD.

Nice story bro. Charles Fried, the staunch conservative who hired her to HLS says you're wrong. And as someone who was taught by her, I can say she was one of the best profs there.

And if you look at her resume, she already had taught at some very well-respected law schools like University of Pennsylvania (ranked #7), University of Michigan(#8), University of Texas at Austin (#15), and spent a year as a Harvard visiting professor.

I really wanted to publish one of her articles when I was the head of my school's journal but we couldn't get it. I had no idea about her politics and assumed she leaned conservative (for a law professor) based on her academic writing. The notion she wasn't a good scholar is just silly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

[Anonymous]

http://truthfeed.com/shock-video-2004-elizabeth-warren-describes-hillary-as-a-corporate-donor-puppet/6677/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The Herald later quoted Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, saying, “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned.”"

symantics

"never mentioned" does not equate to not being aware that she had checked the box.......

He also said it played no role. Also since she was invited, it is not clear there was a form with a box to check. In earlier jobs we know she checked "white".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

Especially stop posting nauseating statements like, "I love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife." Gross. Thank God there are real men in th world, who actually DO love women. What a scumbag.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Herald later quoted Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, saying, “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned.”"

symantics

"never mentioned" does not equate to not being aware that she had checked the box.......

He also said it played no role. Also since she was invited, it is not clear there was a form with a box to check. In earlier jobs we know she checked "white".

So what. We are asked to check that box on a regular basis, in almost any capacity beginning with when we enter K. Do you object to the Census too?

[Anonymous]

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting. Especially stop posting nauseating statements like, "I love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife." Gross. Thank God there are real men in th world, who actually DO love women. What a scumbag.

Gross that I think my wife is pretty? Guess I should just like ugly women then. Well, here you go:

http://www.returnofkings.com/22653/the-7-ugliest-women-in-the-democratic-party


You probably fit right in with that group. You enjoy yourself the rest of the day now, baby-doll. Ta-ta.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

Typical liberal response. When you do not agree with me, I demand you stop exercising your First Amendment right. If you do not like the poster's comments, stop reading the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?

Not defending Trump. Cannot stand him. But, Warren has baggage, as well. She talks about income inequality--but look at her own background. She talks about the corrupt banks--but she made money off of foreclosed homes. She talks about the cost of college, but look at what she made at Harvard--for teaching very few classes. She talks about giving everyone a fair shake--yet she claimed minority status. (Look at Harvard law faculty--I went through three or four pages of them, and they ALL had been to Ivy schools. Yet, Warren did not. Odd. She was hired there about a year after she was identified as Native American.) She's a poseur. Yes, she is entertaining, bright, and personable. And a FRAUD.

Nice story bro. Charles Fried, the staunch conservative who hired her to HLS says you're wrong. And as someone who was taught by her, I can say she was one of the best profs there.

Let me just add that Warren was considered a rising star in academic circles while before she showed any political aspirations. If you think she wasn't a successful scholar and didn't warrant her place on Harvard's faculty, you just don't like her. You've dead wrong on the facts.

She was considered an academic star unril a lot of her research was exposed as being weak.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/07/considering-elizabeth-warren-the-scholar/60211/

To me, Warren really exposes herself as an unsophisticated talking head when she riffs on student loans. She generally likes to claim that student loan borrowers shouldn't be paying higher interest rates than the Fed Funds rate, which completely ignores (a) the different credit risks for the different class of borrowers and (b) that lower student loan interest rates would actually implode the federal student loan programs because the program clearly depends on interest revenue for future sources of lending. Either she is being completely disingenuous or she is making basic mistakes that no alleged superstar in the area of bankruptcy law should be making.

My read is that because her populist streak resonates so well on campus, the academy holds her up as an alleged superstar. Ironically, the same people that tell us that diversity is important so that group think doesn't set in seem to overlook the fact that the academy is one of the least viewpoint diverse professional areas AND the members of the academy are the gatekeepers to the ivory tower.

Can't speak to her as an in classroom lecturer, but as someone who read her casebook cover to cover and practices in a related area of law, I do not find her to be particularly insightful in either the academic context or an application context. In fact, I seem to recall a few years back she was part of that loose coalition in the field of bankruptcy that was agitating for reform of the BK code to make it less friendly for secured creditors and more friendly to certain classes of unsecured creditors (like hourly labor and retirees).

Trump is absolutely a fraud, but so is Warren. Whether you see one of the two or both as a fraud is almost 100% determined by your political affiliation.

[Anonymous]

Funny, in 2004 she called Hillary a corporate puppet

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

Typical liberal response. When you do not agree with me, I demand you stop exercising your First Amendment right. If you do not like the poster's comments, stop reading the thread.

What letter does your first name begin with?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

Typical liberal response. When you do not agree with me, I demand you stop exercising your First Amendment right. If you do not like the poster's comments, stop reading the thread.

Your understanding of the First Amendment is laughably bad. Unfortunately the MRA posts aren't laughably bad, just sad and tedious, and they are a drag to have to read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hi again, MRA. Still unemployed and single, I take it

Nice try. I'm married over 12 years with kids and quite employed, with the government no less.

MRA = Male Rape Apologist (absurd claim). There can be no apology for rape for it is a crime, just as it is a crime to have a personal mail server in your home withholding classified documents
from FOIA requests.

If anyone is an MRA --an apologist for rape, it is Hillary Clinton apologizing and covering for the adulteries of Bill Clinton who abused his power over subordinate women to engage
in sexual acts with them such as with Monica Lewinsky. Amusingly, it passed into the lexicon that a synonym for blowjob was a "Lewinsky".

This is typical of what liberals do when the truth is inconvenient: make absurd "seriousness of the charge" claims, paint labels on people that have a subtle connotation to crime, and keep blabbing it and blabbing it
never stopping, refusing to hear truth, refusing to consider their words and world view are based on lies because they themselves are liars and there is no truth in them. They love to bring the charge of hypocrite
when the great irony is that they are the biggest hypocrites of all.

Now that we see I am not a mysogynist (I'm married and love women, especially the pretty ones like my wife), and not an MRA because rape is abhorrent, I guess you'll have to pick out some other label to try and stick it to me.

Hillary isn't black so you can't bring out the racist charge, she's not a lesbian so you can't call me a homophobic bigot, so all you got is crawling around in the gutter you live in to throw some other kind of sewage at me. Keep trying and I'll keep laughing at you. Ha ha.

I would personally appreciate if you could stop posting.

Typical liberal response. When you do not agree with me, I demand you stop exercising your First Amendment right. If you do not like the poster's comments, stop reading the thread.

Yes indeed. Kind of like Hillary telling Trump to delete his account.
Yep, it’s all about silencing the opposition.