Vicious Dog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahaha. Definitely not getting two bigger dogs (even though I love them!), so I guess I will have to celebrate the holidays in my nice house with my kids. Sorry Grandparents, you picked the dog over my kids and I couldn't be happier!

-OP

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

special needs child??? Are we reading the same thread???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahaha. Definitely not getting two bigger dogs (even though I love them!), so I guess I will have to celebrate the holidays in my nice house with my kids. Sorry Grandparents, you picked the dog over my kids and I couldn't be happier!

-OP

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

special needs child??? Are we reading the same thread???

Haha. Pp is either a troll or an asshole trying to justify her violent dogs. There are no special need kids ere. Not in OP's SIL's house and definitely not in PP's house, though it sounds like she could probably use some therapy.

It doesn't matter how much you love your pets. They aren't humans, and believe it or not, even special needs kids don't typically bite strangers. And if a special needs kid bit you, PP, I know you would be on here ranting about "breeders" and their inability to control their kids.

Stay home, and keep your "kids" home. None of you are welcome in public.

Op, your solution is a good one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahaha. Definitely not getting two bigger dogs (even though I love them!), so I guess I will have to celebrate the holidays in my nice house with my kids. Sorry Grandparents, you picked the dog over my kids and I couldn't be happier!

-OP

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

Hey, OP! Looks like your loser SIL reads DCUM!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Update:

Apparently SIL feels we were rude and unwelcoming to her dog (please note- TO HER DOG NOT HER) and should not have told MIL that next time the dog should stay home. She is not speaking to us apparently because we don't treat her dog as a family member. Um okay. I feel like we now have the perfect reason to stop visiting MIL. Fine by me. I am not going to engage at all, just stop visiting.

SIL power trip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahaha. Definitely not getting two bigger dogs (even though I love them!), so I guess I will have to celebrate the holidays in my nice house with my kids. Sorry Grandparents, you picked the dog over my kids and I couldn't be happier!

-OP

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

Hey, OP! Looks like your loser SIL reads DCUM!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahaha. Definitely not getting two bigger dogs (even though I love them!), so I guess I will have to celebrate the holidays in my nice house with my kids. Sorry Grandparents, you picked the dog over my kids and I couldn't be happier!

-OP

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

Hey, OP! Looks like your loser SIL reads DCUM!

It is quite possible that she does read DCUM. I haven't heard anything since we are getting the silent treatment. If it is the SIL- sorry you had to read my unfiltered comments about your dog. But I'm sure you did not have a fun holiday either since we were all positive the dog would bite the kids. By the way, those that were bitten aren't terribly fond of the doggie either. Maybe next year you find a dogsitter? It does not matter to me either way as we are staying home.

-OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My mom had a dog who was a dominant/aggressive and who bit my then-toddler once on the hand (kid startled dog). It was minor, but she put the dog down the next day. Said she couldn't/wouldn't risk it.

That is awful. Your child caused a death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My mom had a dog who was a dominant/aggressive and who bit my then-toddler once on the hand (kid startled dog). It was minor, but she put the dog down the next day. Said she couldn't/wouldn't risk it.

That is awful. Your child caused a death.

That's enough with you Looney Tunes. The child was an innocent and the dog was an aggressor. If a dog cannot live peacefully in a home without nearly killing a small child, the dog owner must take action. Go away and stop trolling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I haven't said anything to this point, but OP your cruelty astounds me. You relish your decision to withhold your children from their in-laws. You demand that MIL force SIL to turn her back on her special needs child. All because you are the "mother".

OP, you disgust me. Your children have learned nothing about defusing conflict. You have taught them nothing about working with creatures with other backgrounds and upbringings. You failed to provide any self-preservation techniques. You have instilled not one iota of compassion in your children.

You have taught your human children that they are special snowflakes, the center of the universe. You're the type of person I encounter when I take my dogs on walks. You think your children own the fenced-in school playground because they are honors students at fill-in-the-blank elementary, and that my children don't matter because they don't read and write. Because my children bark their language and have fur. Fact is, my children, what you call "vicious dogs", are loved far more than you really love your children. Because I expose my children to the world, warts and all, and nurture them through the experience so that they grow resilient and learn how to take care of themselves.

You might want to try that, rather than bully your in-laws and then gloat about it. I feel for your DH being married to you. As discussed in the relationship thread, he's one person for whom an affair is more than justified.

This is really bad for your dogs. Because you're not training them properly, you're putting them at risk. Even if you don't care about other people, think about your dogs' safety and take them to an obedience class. Keep them away from places where they're likely to get in trouble, like the schoolyard.

[Anonymous]

Don't engage with the dog troll. She's either a lunatic or a troll. And if she is real, someone is going to get hurt by her hell hounds. If a dog bites one of my kids I'll sue the owner and will make sure the dog is put down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My mom had a dog who was a dominant/aggressive and who bit my then-toddler once on the hand (kid startled dog). It was minor, but she put the dog down the next day. Said she couldn't/wouldn't risk it.

That is awful. Your child caused a death.

That's enough with you Looney Tunes. The child was an innocent and the dog was an aggressor. If a dog cannot live peacefully in a home without nearly killing a small child, the dog owner must take action. Go away and stop trolling.

seriously.