Gorgeous 38 yr old doctor, mom of 3 found dead in NYC building lobby

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Overly bright, pupils like olives, eyelids wrenched open...nose tilted down is a classic booger sugar loer pose, don't want to expose the red nostrils to the camera.


Lol too funny. Good description. Lol
Anonymous
Just what an embarrassing, heartbreaking (for the children) way to die. A terrible legacy to leave.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else really into this story? Not sure if it's because she went to one of the same schools as I did or because she seems like someone I'd know in real life. So sad for her husband and young kids!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3260736/High-flying-doctor-mother-Kiersten-Rickenbach-Cerveny-taking-cocaine-drinking-two-men-dead-doorway-Manhattan-apartment-block.html


This has "hooker" written all over it.


But why would she....???? The risk of STDs and getting hurt. And just the grossness of it all. Why?? She had had 3 fairly recent pregnancies and it seems doubtful that she was strung out on drugs when she was pregnant (or at least I hope not). Even if she had a drug habit it seems as though she must have had some sort of control over it.


Well I posted that before reading about the girls night out. However, it wouldn't be the first time someone like this led a double-life.

Look, I don't buy the rape scenarios -- panties stuffed in a handbag sounds like a consensual situation to me.

Whether she was literally being pimped out as an escort or just banged the men for drugs, there's a sexual aspect to this whole situation.


Why do the panties in her handbag make this sound consensual? To me that sounds like someone stuffing her panties in her handbag so that they could get rid of her and her purse and everything else associated with her as fast as possible. They and she didn't put her panties back on because she was dead.


I believe it's consensual because the police have ruled out homicide.


Have they even determined how she died? Didn't this just happen on Sunday?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Something really rubs me the wrong way about "gorgeous" being the first work in your "headline." How is that at all relevant? Does it make it more tragic?


To DCUM audience? Yes, it does. Especially if they were wealthy (check) and pretty (check).

Look at the crazy, unending thread about Savopoulos family tragedy - wealthy, attractive, and seemingly "had it all." Those traits are the gossip grist for the DCUM lookie-loos.


It really does make it seem shallow when you write gorgeous as a headline.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else really into this story? Not sure if it's because she went to one of the same schools as I did or because she seems like someone I'd know in real life. So sad for her husband and young kids!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3260736/High-flying-doctor-mother-Kiersten-Rickenbach-Cerveny-taking-cocaine-drinking-two-men-dead-doorway-Manhattan-apartment-block.html


This has "hooker" written all over it.


But why would she....???? The risk of STDs and getting hurt. And just the grossness of it all. Why?? She had had 3 fairly recent pregnancies and it seems doubtful that she was strung out on drugs when she was pregnant (or at least I hope not). Even if she had a drug habit it seems as though she must have had some sort of control over it.


Well I posted that before reading about the girls night out. However, it wouldn't be the first time someone like this led a double-life.

Look, I don't buy the rape scenarios -- panties stuffed in a handbag sounds like a consensual situation to me.

Whether she was literally being pimped out as an escort or just banged the men for drugs, there's a sexual aspect to this whole situation.


Why do the panties in her handbag make this sound consensual? To me that sounds like someone stuffing her panties in her handbag so that they could get rid of her and her purse and everything else associated with her as fast as possible. They and she didn't put her panties back on because she was dead.


I believe it's consensual because the police have ruled out homicide.


Have they even determined how she died? Didn't this just happen on Sunday?


They don't have autopsy results. Just stated it did not appear to be a homicide. From the scene could probably tell drug overdose.

However, both men were wealthy and connected. They would have good legal counsel and connections.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else really into this story? Not sure if it's because she went to one of the same schools as I did or because she seems like someone I'd know in real life. So sad for her husband and young kids!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3260736/High-flying-doctor-mother-Kiersten-Rickenbach-Cerveny-taking-cocaine-drinking-two-men-dead-doorway-Manhattan-apartment-block.html


This has "hooker" written all over it.


But why would she....???? The risk of STDs and getting hurt. And just the grossness of it all. Why?? She had had 3 fairly recent pregnancies and it seems doubtful that she was strung out on drugs when she was pregnant (or at least I hope not). Even if she had a drug habit it seems as though she must have had some sort of control over it.


Well I posted that before reading about the girls night out. However, it wouldn't be the first time someone like this led a double-life.

Look, I don't buy the rape scenarios -- panties stuffed in a handbag sounds like a consensual situation to me.

Whether she was literally being pimped out as an escort or just banged the men for drugs, there's a sexual aspect to this whole situation.


Why do the panties in her handbag make this sound consensual? To me that sounds like someone stuffing her panties in her handbag so that they could get rid of her and her purse and everything else associated with her as fast as possible. They and she didn't put her panties back on because she was dead.


I believe it's consensual because the police have ruled out homicide.


Have they even determined how she died? Didn't this just happen on Sunday?


They don't have autopsy results. Just stated it did not appear to be a homicide. From the scene could probably tell drug overdose.

However, both men were wealthy and connected. They would have good legal counsel and connections.


Yeah, the one guy's wife is a wall street lawyer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else really into this story? Not sure if it's because she went to one of the same schools as I did or because she seems like someone I'd know in real life. So sad for her husband and young kids!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3260736/High-flying-doctor-mother-Kiersten-Rickenbach-Cerveny-taking-cocaine-drinking-two-men-dead-doorway-Manhattan-apartment-block.html


This has "hooker" written all over it.


But why would she....???? The risk of STDs and getting hurt. And just the grossness of it all. Why?? She had had 3 fairly recent pregnancies and it seems doubtful that she was strung out on drugs when she was pregnant (or at least I hope not). Even if she had a drug habit it seems as though she must have had some sort of control over it.


Well I posted that before reading about the girls night out. However, it wouldn't be the first time someone like this led a double-life.

Look, I don't buy the rape scenarios -- panties stuffed in a handbag sounds like a consensual situation to me.

Whether she was literally being pimped out as an escort or just banged the men for drugs, there's a sexual aspect to this whole situation.


Why do the panties in her handbag make this sound consensual? To me that sounds like someone stuffing her panties in her handbag so that they could get rid of her and her purse and everything else associated with her as fast as possible. They and she didn't put her panties back on because she was dead.


I believe it's consensual because the police have ruled out homicide.


Have they even determined how she died? Didn't this just happen on Sunday?


They don't have autopsy results. Just stated it did not appear to be a homicide. From the scene could probably tell drug overdose.

However, both men were wealthy and connected. They would have good legal counsel and connections.


One of the guys is a cab driver and drug dealer (his nickname is Pepsi, for christ's sake). My guess is that the fugly HBO producer will squeal on Pepsi in exchange for immunity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She met up with the 51-year old married guy she met on Facebiok and was partying with him and the cab driver. They went back to cabbies place at 4:30am. She was naked from waist down, panties in purse....they still say not a homicide. All very bizarre.


...after she left her girlfriends to go with this guy at 4:30am


The account I read said that she was fully clothed but had her underwear in her purse. Not that it makes a huge difference....her underwear was in her purse*. Good lord.


She was actually naked from the waist up (topless) with underwear in her purse. I see myself in her and it's so scary. Sometimes when you're smart, type A, ambitious and you've done everything right and "perfect" your entire life you have another side that wants to let loose and not care.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Overly bright, pupils like olives, eyelids wrenched open...nose tilted down is a classic booger sugar loer pose, don't want to expose the red nostrils to the camera.


You must be so old lol. This is classic selfie pose, nothing else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She met up with the 51-year old married guy she met on Facebiok and was partying with him and the cab driver. They went back to cabbies place at 4:30am. She was naked from waist down, panties in purse....they still say not a homicide. All very bizarre.


...after she left her girlfriends to go with this guy at 4:30am


The account I read said that she was fully clothed but had her underwear in her purse. Not that it makes a huge difference....her underwear was in her purse*. Good lord.


She was actually naked from the waist up (topless) with underwear in her purse. I see myself in her and it's so scary. Sometimes when you're smart, type A, ambitious and you've done everything right and "perfect" your entire life you have another side that wants to let loose and not care.


Yes, this is what I read as well. Another resident of the building described her as being topless, her face was sickly pale white, and blue lips while the men were performing CPR on her in the hallway. So messed up.
The details are only getting more sordid as they are revealed. I feel terrible for the husband.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She met up with the 51-year old married guy she met on Facebiok and was partying with him and the cab driver. They went back to cabbies place at 4:30am. She was naked from waist down, panties in purse....they still say not a homicide. All very bizarre.


...after she left her girlfriends to go with this guy at 4:30am


The account I read said that she was fully clothed but had her underwear in her purse. Not that it makes a huge difference....her underwear was in her purse*. Good lord.


She was actually naked from the waist up (topless) with underwear in her purse. I see myself in her and it's so scary. Sometimes when you're smart, type A, ambitious and you've done everything right and "perfect" your entire life you have another side that wants to let loose and not care.


I'm not buying that this woman was working full time, taking care of 3 young kids and regularly engaging in this type of hard core lifestyle. That would be hell on a person 10 years or even 20 years younger than she was. She looks radiant in her pictures. Her husband looks healthy.....I am just not seeing how this woman could have been a coke head/hooker on the side like that. She would look like hell if she was.

It isn't a total stunner that she was using recreational drugs and even going out with the girls. But staying up until 4:30am partying and willingly getting naked with a couple of old dudes just seems soooo...improbable.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Arrest warrant has been issued for James Pepsi Holder
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2015/10/james-pepsi-holder-kiersten-cervenys-drug-dealer-still-on-the-run/



Who is that in the picture??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She met up with the 51-year old married guy she met on Facebiok and was partying with him and the cab driver. They went back to cabbies place at 4:30am. She was naked from waist down, panties in purse....they still say not a homicide. All very bizarre.


...after she left her girlfriends to go with this guy at 4:30am


The account I read said that she was fully clothed but had her underwear in her purse. Not that it makes a huge difference....her underwear was in her purse*. Good lord.


She was actually naked from the waist up (topless) with underwear in her purse. I see myself in her and it's so scary. Sometimes when you're smart, type A, ambitious and you've done everything right and "perfect" your entire life you have another side that wants to let loose and not care.


Yes, this is what I read as well. Another resident of the building described her as being topless, her face was sickly pale white, and blue lips while the men were performing CPR on her in the hallway. So messed up.
The details are only getting more sordid as they are revealed. I feel terrible for the husband.


The men were seen on surveillance cameras carrying her (topless?) and they said they were going to put her in a cab like that? Was her shirt and bra in her purse too? So freaking messed up.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: