Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In bounds or OOB? Why would an MD family send their DC to DCPS when MCPS has good options?
You do realize that MD is not JUST MOCO, right? PG is just as close and I'd bet that if there is truly a MD family there, they are from PG.
-Signed a PG resident who applied to MySchoolDC with a DC address and got matched at a HRCS

Don't take the bait. Please.
14:10 here. Forgot to add that we are able to prove DC residency. We aren't crazies who just played the lottery with a made-up address.
You can't prove DC residency without violating DC law in the event you are actually a resident of PG County.
You can be a resident of two different jurisdictions supimultaneously. You may not consider your self a crazy, but you are nevertheless a thief engaging in an act of criminal fraud.
I'm not either of these PPs, but re: teh bolded language above -- which I think the PP meant to say "You CAN'T be a resident of two different jurisdictions....". Not to play devil's advocate, but.... there is not a single place in the DC education law (direclty or by reference) that defines "resident" for these purpuses. If you start to look at the definition of "resident" for other legal purposes, there are actually a ton of laws under which you can be a resident of two places at once. For example, federal US tax law defines resident to include any US citizen. Regardless of whether you live in the US. So you can have been born here and lived in Canada your whole life, and you clearly and untestedly fall within the definition of "resident" for US tax law.
Therefore, when a law is intended to apply to only one place of residence, you wlil generally see terms like "primary residence" or "closest connection". So, to use the above example, US tax treaties with other countries always talk about residence as the place you have a closer connection with - so you don't get double-taxed by both countries. The DC education laws make no reference to "primary residence" or anything simliar. Just residence. So actually, if you took it to court on the basis that you had two residences (even if you didn't really live in the DC residence), i think you'd probably win.
I don't know if PP with the DC/MD address has a legitimate residence in DC, but assuming they keep two properties, but happen to sleep most of the time in MD, I think by law they would be entitled to DC schools.