Mary - Gestational Surrogate or Biological Mother of Jesus?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?


So your answer to the meaning of life is to spend your time on the Religion forum, despite being a non-believer, and to insult people there anonymously?

Uh, OK, seems like you've got it all figured out then.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?


So your answer to the meaning of life is to spend your time on the Religion forum, despite being a non-believer, and to insult people there anonymously?

Uh, OK, seems like you've got it all figured out then.


maybe pp meant wasting time believing certain things -- not wasting time being on this forum. Perhaps pp spends very little time here and just pops in occasionally to see what people are up to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?


So your answer to the meaning of life is to spend your time on the Religion forum, despite being a non-believer, and to insult people there anonymously?

Uh, OK, seems like you've got it all figured out then.


maybe pp meant wasting time believing certain things -- not wasting time being on this forum. Perhaps pp spends very little time here and just pops in occasionally to see what people are up to.


Yes, that must be it, she pops in occasionally . Also, insulting people who think/believe differently from you is never a waste of time .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.


If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator
Muslima
Member

Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.


If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator



That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......
Anonymous
Muslima wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.


If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator



That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......


And he loves us
Anonymous
Muslima wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.


If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator



That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......

Actually, it was Adam and Eve's choice not Gods.
Muslima
Member

Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Muslima wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.


If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator



That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......

Actually, it was Adam and Eve's choice not Gods.


I wasnt respond to the Adam and Eve's comment but to the person who posted after that. ....
Anonymous


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.


Wait - this is a serious post?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.


Wait - this is a serious post?


Eve tricked Adam into doing that. Women are part devil!
post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: