and the "nonbelievers" who die -- are they any remaining non-muslims, e.g., atheists, buddhists, Christians who don't accept that Jesus isn't coming to perpetuate Christianity? When you say all religious sects disappear, do you mean Jesus won't be Christian any more? |
As i said earlier, we don't believe Jesus is Christian, we believe that all prophets are Muslims. The tradition doesn't go in details about what happens to buddhists, atheists, it just says "Non-beleivers". I don't know if there will be Christians who won't accept him, there isn't anything in the tradition about that. My guess is, when they will see him in person, it would be pretty convincing, right? But, who knows, God Knows best! |
People, can we please get back to the original question? Was Mary the biological mother of Jesus or just a surrogate? I'd like to add the question: whose DNA did Jesus share?
Start a new thread about Islam and end times if you want to discuss that. |
This is all speculative like so much in the Bible. Though it says "born of a woman" which would imply regular parenthood, in those days, probably meant a woman as a vessel for the man's (God in this case) seed - so the DNA would be all God's. Although they didn't have a concept of DNA (the all-knowing God did, of course, but he wasn't talking), I'm assuming people back then noticed that sometimes a child looked much more like its mother than its father. Is there any reference in the Bible to that sort of recognition? - not necessarily about Jesus, but about any Biblical character. I can't think of any, but I'm not that well-versed in the Bible. Also, is there any Biblical reference at all to what Jesus looked like? I know we westerns have a blue eyed image of him that if probably off, but I wonder how people in his time saw him. |
I apologize. To go back to your question, from an Islamic perspective, we were told that the likeness of Jesus is that of Adam , the first man and prophet: "Verily, the likeness of Jesus before Allah regarding Allah's ability, since He created him without a father,is the likeness of Adam, for Allah created Adam without a father or a mother. Rather, Allah said, He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!'' and he was.)" From this, I gather that Mary was the biological mother because, God doesn't need a surrogate as in the creation of Adam, He didn't use one, nor did He use one for the creation of Eve, so He could've created Jesus the same way but chose to give him a mother. That's an interesting question though, I never thought about it. Would like to hear the christian perspective on this. |
Adam and Eve were both created as adults and neither had parents. Jesus was born, not created and had parents. So it's not a similar comparison. Therefore the question of DNA is a legitimate question for Jesus but not for Adam and Eve. |
so much talk about Adam and Eve Do people SERIOUSLY believe these two existed? ![]() fairy tale, folks, written by MEN who had no knowledge of science and let's not forget sexist, as the blame fell on Eve . . . ![]() |
Well, that was exactly my point . God created Adam & Eve from nothing, therefore God doesn't t need a surrogate to create anything. He could've very much created Jesus the same way, from nothing. The very fact that he was born is proof that he carries his mother's DNA. |
I'm terribly confused. I thought that for Christians Jesus WAS God, walking the Earth as man. To be a man, I suppose He had to have the experience of birth. If the body He occupied had DNA, it must have come from his mother. But through Joseph He was of the House of David, right? So perhaps he also received DNA from Joseph; surely God could have managed that by some means other than physical congress.
As many of you know, I'm an atheist and don't actually believe that Jesus was other than a normal mortal, but I have enough respect for those who believe to try to reason within their belief system. I hope it is not taken as an insult by anyone. |
A lot of believing, practicing Christians don't believe Adam and Eve were real people either. They're not even taught that in Sunday School or church -- they're taught that it's just a story, like so many other things in the bible. Many do believe, however that Jesus in God incarnate, so DNA would become an issue in that case. |
Jesus' message, as reported in the New Testament and the Quran, is pretty different. I won't go into details, but suffice it to say, there are different attitudes towards non-believers, women, what you eat, and more. The Islamic position is that the early followers of Christ got it wrong, so God sent Mohammed to correct things. |
No, the islamic position is that the early followers got it right but most of them were persecuted and killed |
The fact that he was born does not prove he carries Mary's DNA. Perhaps you need to review what Gestational Surrogate means. |
Yup, in my mind Jesus probably had Mary's DNA. Otherwise what was the point. Jesus was both divine AND human. So it would make sense that he had human DNA from a human mother. Interesting question as to whether he also had Joseph's DNA. I've heard Joseph referred to as Jesus' adopted dad, so that sort of implies that he doesn't have Joesph's DNA, but that's hardly advanced theological reasoning. |
Do people still really believe in the virgin birth in 2014? Yikes. |